Mar 31, 2025
CORPORATE INFORMATION -NOTE: 01 BRIEF DESCRIPTION ABOUT THE COMPANY
Aditya Birla Capital Limited ("ABCL" and "the Company") (CIN: L64920GJ2007PLC058890) is a public limited company domiciled in India, having its registered office at Indian Rayon Compound, Veraval - 362 266, Gujarat. The Company is a subsidiary of Grasim Industries Limited.
The Board of Directors of the Company at its meeting held on 11th March 2024, had approved a Scheme of Amalgamation of Aditya Birla Finance Limited ("ABFL", "Amalgamating Company") (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company) with the Company under Sections 230 to 232, read with other applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act"), and the Rules framed thereunder.
Pursuant to the Scheme of Amalgamation approved by the Hon''ble National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013, erstwhile Aditya Birla Finance Limited ("the ABFL"), a then wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, was amalgamated with the Company ("ABCL") with effect from the Appointed Date, i.e., 1st April 2024. The Scheme became effective upon filing of the certified order of the NCLT with the Registrar of Companies on 1st April 2025. The ABCL was holding CoR No. B.01.00555 dated 6th July 2017 as NBFC-CIC. Further, erstwhile ABFL was also holding CoR No. N.01.00500 dated 9th August 2011 as NBFC-ICC. Further, in accordance with the no objection letter issued by the Reserve Bank of India ("RBI"), while approving the Scheme, the Certificates of Registration held by the erstwhile ABFL as NBFC-ICC and by the Company as NBFC-CIC have been surrendered, and a fresh application for registration of the Company as an NBFC-ICC has been made. Pending the receipt of Registration as NBFC-ICC, the RBI has permitted the Company to operate as an NBFC-ICC.
The financial statements are authorised for issue by the Board of Directors of the Company at its meeting held on 13th May 2025.
NOTE: 02 MATERIAL ACCOUNTING POLICIESA. Basis of Preparation
The Standalone Financial Statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) prescribed under Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013, read together with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended from time to time, and other relevant provisions of the Act and the guidelines and directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), to the extent applicable. The financial statements have been prepared and presented on a going concern basis.
i. Basis of Measurement
The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the application of fair value measurements required or allowed by the relevant accounting standards. Accounting policies have been consistently applied to all periods presented, unless otherwise stated.
Financial assets and financial liabilities are generally reported on a gross basis, except when there is an unconditional legally enforceable right to offset the recognised amounts without being contingent on a future event, and the parties intend to settle on a net basis in the following circumstances:
i. The normal course of business
ii. The event of default
iii. The event of insolvency or bankruptcy of the Company and/or its counterparties.
ii. Use of Estimates and Judgements and Estimation Uncertainty
The preparation of the financial statements requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosed amount of contingent liabilities. Areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where the assumptions are significant to the Company, are discussed in Note 2(O) - Significant Accounting Judgements, Estimates and Assumptions.
iii. Presentation of Financial Statements:
The Company presents its financial statements to comply with Division III of Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013, which provides general instructions for the preparation of financial statements of a non-banking financial company (NBFC to comply with Ind AS) and the requirements of Ind AS.
iv. Functional and Presentation Currency
The financial statements are presented in Indian Rupees in crore, which is determined to be the functional currency of the Company and the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company operates, and rounded off to two decimal places as permitted by Division III of Schedule III of the Act, except when otherwise indicated.
i. Financial Instruments
A financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity.
The classification depends on the contractual terms of the financial assets'' cash flows and the Company''s business model for managing financial assets. The Company determines its business model at the level that best reflects how it manages groups of financial assets to achieve its business objective.
The Company classifies its financial assets into the following measurement categories:
1. Financial assets to be measured at amortised cost
2. Financial assets to be measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
3. Financial assets to be measured at fair value through profit or loss account
The business model is assessed on the basis of aggregated portfolios based on observable factors. These factors include:
⢠Reports reviewed by the entity''s Key Management Personnel on the performance of the financial assets.
⢠The risks impacting the performance of the business model (and the financial assets held within that business model) and its management thereof.
⢠The compensation of the managing teams (for example, whether the compensation is based on the fair value of the assets managed or on the contractual cash flows collected).
⢠The expected frequency, value and timing of trades.
The business model assessment is based on reasonably expected scenarios without taking ''worst case'' or ''stress case'' scenarios into account.
The Company also assesses the contractual terms of the financial assets on the basis of its contractual cash flow characteristics that are solely for the payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.
''Principal'' is defined as the fair value of the financial asset at initial recognition and may change over the life of the financial asset (for example, if there are repayments of principal or amortisation of the premium/discount).
In making this assessment, the Company considers whether the contractual cash flows are consistent with a basic lending arrangement, i.e., interest includes only consideration for the time value of money, credit risk, other basic lending risks and a profit margin that is consistent with a basic lending arrangement. Where the contractual terms introduce exposure to risk or volatility that are inconsistent with a basic lending arrangement, the related financial asset is classified and measured at fair value through profit or loss.
Sales, that are infrequent and insignificant in value both individually and in aggregate, are considered to be consistent with the business model whose objective is to hold and collect the contractual cash flows.
The Company classifies its financial liabilities at amortised costs unless it has designated liabilities at fair value through the profit and loss account or is required to measure liabilities at fair value through profit or loss.
ii. Financial Assets
All financial assets are recognised initially at fair value. Further, in the case of financial assets not recorded at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs, that are attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset, are added to the fair value. Trade receivables that do not contain a significant financing component are measured at transaction price. Investments in Subsidiaries, Associates and Joint Ventures are accounted at cost in accordance with Ind AS 27.
A ''debt instrument'' is measured at the amortised cost if both the following conditions are met:
a) The asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets for collecting contractual cash flows, and
b) Contractual terms of the asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely for the payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.
After initial measurement, such financial assets are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the Effective Interest Rate method (EIR). Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The amortisation
is included in interest income in the Statement of Profit and Loss. The losses arising from impairment are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss.
These financial assets comprise bank balances, trade receivables, loans, investments and other financial assets.
⢠Subsequent Measurement - Financial Assets Measured at Fair Value through Other Comprehensive Income
Debt instruments: A ''debt instrument'' is classified as at the Fair Value through Other Comprehensive Income (FVTOCI) if both of the following criteria are met:
a) The objective of the business model is achieved both by collecting contractual cash flows and selling the financial assets, and
b) The asset''s contractual cash flows represent Solely Payment of Principal and Interest (SPPI).
Debt instruments included within the FVTOCI category are measured initially, as well as at each reporting date at fair value. Fair value movements are recognised in the Other Comprehensive Income (OCI). However, the Company recognises interest income, impairment losses and reversals and foreign exchange gain or loss in the Statement of Profit and Loss. On derecognition of the asset, cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in OCI is reclassified from the equity to the Statement of Profit and Loss. Interest earned whilst holding FVTOCI debt instrument is reported as interest income using the EIR method.
All equity investments in the scope of the Ind AS 109 are measured at fair value. For all such equity investments, the Company may make an irrevocable election to present the subsequent changes in the fair value in OCI. The Company makes such election on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The classification is made on initial recognition, and is irrevocable.
If the Company decides to classify an equity instrument at FVTOCI, then all fair value changes on the instrument, excluding dividends, are recognised in the OCI. There is no recycling of the amounts from the OCI to the Statement of Profit and Loss, even on sale of investment. However, the Company may transfer the cumulative gain or loss within equity.
FVTPL is a residual category for debt instruments. Any debt instrument, which does not meet the criteria for categorisation as at amortised cost or as FVTOCI, is classified at FVTPL.
In addition, the Company may elect to designate a debt instrument, which otherwise meets amortised cost or FVTOCI criteria, at FVTPL. However, such election is allowed only if doing so reduces or eliminates a measurement or recognition inconsistency (referred to as ''accounting mismatch'').
Debt instruments included within the FVTPL category are measured at fair value with all the changes recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss.
Equity instruments included within the Fair Value through Profit or Loss (FVTPL) category are measured at fair value with all changes recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss.
iii. Financial Liabilities and Equity Instruments
Debt and equity instruments, issued by the Company, are classified as either financial liabilities or as equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangements and the definitions of financial liability and an equity instrument.
An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Company after deducting all of its liabilities. Equity instruments issued by the Company are recognised at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs.
All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value and, in the case of loans and borrowings and payables, net of directly attributable transaction costs. The Company''s financial liabilities include borrowings, overdrafts, trade and other payables, etc.
The measurement of financial liabilities depends on their classification, as described below:
Financial liabilities at FVTPL include financial liabilities held for trading and financial liabilities designated upon initial recognition as at FVTPL. Financial liabilities are classified as held for trading, if they are incurred for the purpose of repurchasing in the near term. This category also includes derivative financial instruments entered into by the Company that are not designated as hedging instruments in hedge relationships as defined by Ind AS 109.
Gains or losses on liabilities held for trading are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss.
Financial liabilities, designated upon initial recognition at FVTPL, are designated as such at the initial date of recognition, and only if the criteria in Ind AS 109 are satisfied.
After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the EIR method. Gains and losses are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss when the liabilities are derecognised as well as through the EIR amortisation process.
- Amortised cost is calculated by considering any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation is included as finance costs in the Statement of Profit and Loss.
iv. Recognition and Derecognition of Financial Assets and Liabilities
A financial asset or a financial liability is recognised in the Ba lance Sheet when the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument, which is generally on the trade date. Loans and receivables are recognised when cash is advanced (or settled) to the borrowers. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are recognised initially at fair value. All other financial assets are recognised initially at fair value plus directly attributable transaction costs.
⢠Financial Assets
A financial asset (or, where applicable, a part of a financial asset or part of a group of similar financial assets) is primarily derecognised when:
a) The right to receive cash flows from the asset has expired, or
b) The Company has transferred its right to receive cash flows from the asset, or has assumed an obligation to pay the received cash flows in full without material delay to a third party under a ''pass-through'' arrangement; and either
i. the Company has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, or
ii. the Company has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, but has transferred control of the asset.
⢠Financial Liabilities
A financial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expires. When an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is treated as the derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability. The difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss.
v. Impairment of Financial Assets
In accordance with Ind AS 109, the Company applies expected credit loss (ECL) model for measurement and recognition of impairment loss on the following financial assets and credit risk exposure:
a) Financial assets, that are debt instruments, are measured at amortised cost, e.g., loans, debt securities, deposits, and other balances.
b) Financial assets that are measured as at FVTOCI.
c) Loan commitments which are not measured as at FVTPL.
d) Financial guarantee contracts which are not measured as at FVTPL.
For recognition of impairment loss on other financial assets and risk exposure, the Company determines whether there has been a significant increase in the credit risk since initial recognition. If the credit risk has not increased significantly, 12-month ECL is used to provide
for impairment loss. However, if credit risk has increased significantly, lifetime ECL is used. If, in a subsequent period, credit quality of the instrument improves such that there is no longer a significant increase in the credit risk since initial recognition, then the entity reverts to recognising impairment loss allowance based on 12-month ECL.
The Company has established a policy to perform an assessment at the end of each reporting period of whether the credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition by considering the change in the risk of default occurring over the remaining life of the financial instrument.
To calculate ECL, the Company estimates the risk of a default occurring on the financial instrument during its expected life. ECLs are estimated based on the present value of all cash shortfalls over the remaining expected life of the financial asset, i.e., the difference between the contractual cash flows, that are due to the Company under the contract, and the cash flows that the Company expects to receive are discounted at the effective interest rate of the loan.
The Company groups its loans into Stage 1, Stage 2 and Stage 3, based on the applied impairment methodology, as described below:
For exposures where there has not been a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition and that are not credit impaired upon origination, the portion of the lifetime ECL associated with the probability of default events occurring within the next 12 months is recognised.
For exposures where there has been a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition but are not credit impaired, a lifetime ECL (i.e., reflecting the remaining lifetime of the financial asset) is recognised.
Exposures are assessed as credit impaired when one or more events, that have a detrimental impact on the estimated future cash flows of that asset, have occurred. For exposures that have become credit impaired, a lifetime ECL is recognised and interest revenue is calculated by applying the effective interest rate to the amortised cost (net of provision) rather than the gross carrying amount.
ECL impairment loss allowance (or reversal) during the period is recognised as income/expense in the Statement
of Profit and Loss. This amount is reflected under the head ''Impairment on Financial Instruments'' in the Statement of Profit and Loss. On the other side, for financial assets measured as at amortised cost, ECL is presented as an allowance, i.e., as an integral part of the measurement of those assets in the Balance Sheet. The allowance reduces the net carrying amount. Until the asset meets writeoff criteria, the Company does not reduce impairment allowance from the gross carrying amount.
In terms of the requirement as per the RBI notification no. RBI/2019-20/170 DOR (NBFC).CC.PD. No.109/22.10.106/2019-20 dated 13th March 2020 on Implementation of Indian Accounting Standards, NonBanking Financial Companies (N BFCs) are required to create an impairment reserve for any shortfall in impairment allowances under Ind AS 109 and Income Recognition, Asset Classification and Provisioning (IRACP) norms (including provision on standard assets). The impairment allowances under Ind AS 109 made by the Company exceeds the total provision required under IRACP (including standard asset provisioning), as at 31st March 2025 and, accordingly, no amount is required to be transferred to impairment reserve.
vi. Offsetting of Financial Instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the Balance Sheet if there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, to realise the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously.
vii. Write-Offs
The Company reduces the gross carrying amount of a financial asset when the Company has no reasonable expectations of recovering a financial asset in its entirety or a portion thereof. This is generally the case when the Company determines that the borrower does not have assets or sources of income that could generate sufficient cash flows to repay the amounts subjected to write-offs. The Company reserves the right to recover such written-off amount. Any subsequent recoveries against such loans are credited to the Statement of Profit and Loss.
viii. Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedge Accounting
The Company enters into forward contracts to hedge the foreign currency risk of firm commitments and highly probable forecast transactions. Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value at the date the derivative contracts are entered into and are subsequently remeasured to their
fair value at the end of each reporting period. The resulting gain or loss is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss immediately, unless the derivative is designated and effective as a hedging instrument, in which event the timing of the recognition in the Statement of Profit and Loss depends on the nature of the hedging relationship and the nature of the hedged item.
The Company enters into derivative financial instruments, viz., foreign exchange forward contracts, interest rate swaps and cross currency swaps to manage its exposure to interest rate and foreign exchange rate risks. The Company does not hold derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Hedge Accounting: The Company designates certain hedging instruments in respect of foreign currency risk and interest rate risk as cash flow hedges. Such hedges are expected to be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows, and are assessed on an ongoing basis to determine that they actually have been highly effective throughout the financial reporting periods for which they were designated.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of the designated portion of derivatives that qualify as cash flow hedges is recognised in Other Comprehensive Income and accumulated under the heading of cash flow hedging reserve. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the Statement of Profit and Loss.
Amounts previously recognised in Other Comprehensive Income and accumulated in other equity relating to effective portion as described above are re-classified to the Statement of Profit and Loss in the periods when the hedged item affects profit or loss. However, when the hedged forecast transaction results in the recognition of a non-financial asset or a non-financial liability, such gains and losses are transferred from equity and included in the initial measurement of the cost of the non-financial asset or non-financial liability.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument expires, terminated, or exercised, without replacement or rollover (as part of the hedging strategy), or if its designation as a hedge is revoked, or when it no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. Any gain or loss recognised in Other Comprehensive Income and accumulated in other equity at that time remains in other equity and is recognised when the forecast transaction is ultimately recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur,
the gain or loss accumulated in other equity is recognised immediately in the Statement of Profit and Loss.
ix. Determination of Fair Value
On initial recognition, all the financial instruments are measured at fair value. For subsequent measurement, the Company measures certain categories of financial instruments (as explained in Notes Nos. 2(B)(i) and 2(B)(ii)) at fair value on each Balance Sheet date.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement is based on the presumption that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either:
⢠In the principal market for the asset or liability, or
⢠In the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability.
The principal or the most advantageous market must be accessible by the Company.
The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest.
A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset considers a market participant''s ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use.
The Company uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances, and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs.
All assets and liabilities for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial statements are categorised within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole:
⢠Level 1 â Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
⢠Level 2 â Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is directly or indirectly observable.
⢠Level 3 â Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is unobservable.
For assets and liabilities that are recognised in the financial statements on a recurring basis, the Company determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by re-assessing categorisation at the end of each reporting period.
Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefit will flow to the Company and the revenue can be reliably measured, and there exists reasonable certainty of its recovery.
i. Interest Income
For all debt instruments measured either at amortised cost or at fair value through other comprehensive income, interest income is recorded using the EIR. EIR is the rate that exactly discounts the estimated future cash payments or receipts over the expected life of the financial instrument or a shorter period, where appropriate, to the gross carrying amount of the financial asset or to the amortised cost of a financial liability. When calculating the EIR, the Company estimates the expected cash flows by considering all the contractual terms of the financial instrument (for example, prepayment, extension, call ad similar options) but does not consider the ECL.
Any subsequent changes in the estimation of the future cash flows are recognised in interest income with the corresponding adjustment to the carrying amount of the assets.
Interest income on credit impaired assets is recognised by applying the EIR to the net amortised cost (net of provision) of the financial asset.
ii. Dividend Income
Dividend income is recognised:
a) When the right to receive the payment is established which is generally when shareholders approve the dividend,
b) it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the dividend will flow to the entity, and
c) the amount of the dividend can be measured reliably.
iii. Rental Income
Rental income arising from operating leases is recognised on a straight-line basis over the lease term. In cases where the increase is in line with expected general inflation, rental income is recognised as per the contractual terms.
iv. Fees and Commission Income
Fees and commissions are recognised when the Company satisfies the performance obligation, at transaction price based on a five-step model as set out below, unless included in the effective interest calculation:
Step 1: Identify contract(s) with a customer: A contract is defined as an agreement between two or more parties that creates enforceable rights and obligations and sets out the criteria for every contract that must be met.
Step 2: Identify performance obligations in the contract: A performance obligation is a promise in a contract with a customer to transfer a good or service to the customer.
Step 3: Determine the transaction price: The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer, excluding amounts collected on behalf of third parties.
Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract: For a contract that has more than one performance obligation, the Company allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation in an amount that depicts the amount of consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for satisfying each performance obligation.
Step 5: Recognise revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation.
v. Net Gain/(Loss) on Fair Value Changes
Any differences between the fair values of financial assets classified as fair value through the profit or loss (refer Note 30), held by the Company on the Balance Sheet date is recognised as an unrealised gain/(loss). In cases there is a net gain/(loss) in the aggregate, the same is recognised in "Net Gain on Fair Value Changes" under Revenue from operations in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Similarly, any realised gain or loss on sale of financial instruments measured at FVTPL is recognised in net gain/(loss) on fair value changes.
Similarly, any differences between the fair values of financial assets classified as fair value through other comprehensive income are disclosed in the OCI.
However, net gain/(loss) on derecognition of financial instruments classified as amortised cost is presented separately under the respective head in the Statement of Profit and Loss.
D. Expenses
Finance costs represent Interest expense recognised by applying the EIR to the gross carrying amount of financial liabilities other than financial liabilities classified as FVTPL.
Interest expense includes issue costs that are initially recognised as part of the carrying value of the financial liability and amortised over the expected life using the effective interest method. These include fees and commissions payable to advisers and other expenses, such as external legal costs, provided these are incremental costs that are directly related to the issue of a financial liability.
⢠Short-Term Employee Benefit
All employee benefits payable wholly within twelve months of rendering the service are classified as short-term employee benefits. These benefits include short-term compensated absences, such as paid annual leave. The undiscounted amount of short-term employee benefits expected to be paid in exchange for the services rendered by employees is recognised as an expense during the period. Benefits such as salaries and wages, etc., and the expected cost of the bonus/ex-gratia are recognised in the period in which the employee renders the related service.
a) Defined Contribution Schemes
The Company makes defined contribution to Government-Managed Employee Provident Fund, Government-Managed Employee Pension Fund, Employee Deposit-Linked Insurance, Employee State Insurance and Superannuation Schemes which are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on accrual basis. Payments to the defined contribution retirement benefit plans are recognised as an expense when employees
have rendered the service entitling them to the contribution.
If the contribution payable to the scheme for the service received before the Balance Sheet date exceeds the contribution already paid, the deficit payable to the scheme is recognised as a liability after deducting the contribution already paid. If the contribution already paid exceeds the contribution due for the services received before the Balance Sheet date, then excess is recognised as an asset to the extent that the pre-payment will lead to, for example, a reduction in future payment or a cash refund.
b) Defined Benefit Expenses
The Company''s liabilities under Payment of Gratuity Act and long-term compensated absences are determined on the basis of actuarial valuation made at the end of each financial year using the projected unit credit method. Obligation is measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using a discounted rate that is determined by reference to market yields at the Balance Sheet date on Government bonds, where the currency and terms of the Government bonds are consistent with the currency and estimated terms of the defined benefit obligation.
The Company presents the entire leave as a provision in the Balance Sheet, since it does not have any unconditional right to defer its settlement for twelve months after the reporting date.
Remeasurements, comprising of actuarial gains and losses, the effect of the asset ceiling, excluding amounts included in net interest on the net defined benefit liability and the return on plan assets, are recognised immediately in the Balance Sheet with a corresponding debit or credit to retained earnings through OCI in the period in which they occur. Remeasurements are not reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods.
Past service costs are recognised in profit or loss at the earliest of:
⢠The date of the plan amendment or curtailment, and
⢠The date that the Company recognises related restructuring costs.
Net interest is calculated by applying the discount rate to the net defined benefit liability or asset. The Company recognises the following changes in the net defined benefit obligation under employee benefit expenses in the Statement of Profit and Loss.
⢠Service costs comprising current service costs, past-service costs, gains and losses on curtailments and non-routine settlements,
⢠Net interest expense or income.
An actuarial valuation involves making various assumptions that may differ from actual developments in the future. These include the determination of the discount rate, attrition rate, future salary increases and mortality rates. Due to the complexities involved in the valuation and its long-term nature, these liabilities are highly sensitive to changes in these assumptions. All assumptions are reviewed at each reporting date.
The Company''s liabilities towards compensated absences to employees are accrued on the basis of valuations, as at the Balance Sheet date, carried out by an independent actuary using Projected Unit Credit Method. The Company presents the provision for compensated absences under the provisions in the Balance Sheet.
Actuarial gains and losses comprise experience adjustments and the effects of changes in actuarial assumptions, and are recognised immediately in the Statement of Profit and Loss.
Equity-settled share-based payments to employees are measured by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the grant date using Black-Scholes Model.
The fair value, determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments, is charged to profit and loss on the straight-line basis over the vesting period of the option, based on the Company''s estimate of equity instruments that will eventually vest, with a corresponding increase in equity.
In case of forfeiture/lapse stock option, which is not vested, amortised portion is reversed by credit to
employee compensation expense. In situation where the stock option expires unexercised, the related balance standing to the credit of the Employee Stock Options Outstanding Account is transferred within equity.
The Company as a Lessee
The Company''s lease assets primarily consist of leases for office buildings. The Company assesses whether a contract contains a lease, at inception of a contract. A contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. To assess whether a contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset, the Company assesses whether: (1) the contract involves the use of an identified asset; (2) the Company has substantially all of the economic benefits from use of the asset through the period of the lease; and (3) the Company has the right to direct the use of the asset.
At the date of commencement of the lease, the Company recognises Right-Of-Use ("ROU") Asset and a corresponding lease liability for all lease arrangements in which it is a lessee, except for leases with a term of twelve months or less (shortterm leases) and low value leases. For these shortterm and low value leases, the Company recognises the lease payments as an operating expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
Certain lease arrangement includes the options to extend or terminate the lease before the end of the lease term. ROU assets and lease liabilities include these options when it is reasonably certain that they will be exercised.
The right-of-use assets are initially recognised at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for any lease payments made at or prior to the commencement date of the lease plus any initial direct costs less any lease incentives. They are subsequently measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.
Right-of-use assets are depreciated from the commencement date on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term and useful life of the underlying asset. Right-of-use assets are evaluated for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts
may not be recoverable. For the purpose of impairment testing, the recoverable amount (i.e., the higher of the fair value less cost to sell and the value in use) is determined on an individual asset basis, unless the asset generates cash flows that are largely dependent of those from other assets. In such cases, the recoverable amount is determined for the Cash Generating Unit (CGU) to which the asset belongs.
The lease liability is initially measured at amortised cost at the present value of the future lease payments. The lease payments are discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if not readily determinable, using the incremental borrowing rates in the country of domicile of the leases. Lease liabilities are remeasured with a corresponding adjustment to the related right-of-use asset, if the Company changes its assessment on exercise of an extension or a termination option.
Lease liability and ROU asset have been separately presented in the Balance Sheet, and lease payments have been classified as financing cash flows.
The following is the summary of practical expedients elected on initial application:
1. Applied a single discount rate to a portfolio of leases of similar assets in similar economic environment with a similar end date.
2. Applied the exemption not to recognise right-of-use assets and liabilities for leases with less than 12 months of lease term on the date of initial application.
3. Excluded the initial direct costs from the measurement of the right-of-use asset at the date of initial application.
4. Applied the practical expedient to grandfather the assessment of which transactions are leases. Accordingly, for all contracts as on 1st April 2019, Ind AS 116 is applied only to contracts that were previously identified as leases under Ind AS 17.
Critical Accounting Judgements and Key Sources of Estimation Uncertainty
Critical judgements required in the application of Ind AS 116 may include, among others, the following:
⢠Identifying whether a contract (or part of a contract) includes a lease;
⢠Determining whether it is reasonably certain that an extension or termination option will be exercised;
⢠Classification of lease agreements (when the entity is a lessor);
⢠Determination of whether variable payments are in substance fixed;
⢠Establishing whether there are multiple leases in an arrangement; and
⢠Determining the stand-alone selling prices of lease and non-lease components.
Key sources of estimation uncertainty in the
application of Ind AS 116 may include, among others,
the following:
⢠Estimation of the lease term;
⢠Determination of the appropriate rate to discount the lease payments; and
⢠Assessment of whether a right-of-use asset is impaired.
The carrying amounts of non-financial assets are reviewed at each reporting date if there is any indication of impairment based on internal/external factors. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). When it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. When a reasonable and consistent basis of allocation can be identified, corporate assets are also allocated to individual cash-generating units, or otherwise they are allocated to the smallest company of cash-generating units, for which a reasonable and consistent allocation basis can be identified.
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and intangible assets not yet available for use are tested for impairment, at least annually, and whenever there is an indication then the asset may be impaired.
An asset is treated as impaired when the carrying cost of the assets exceeds its recoverable value. The recoverable amount is the greater of the assets net selling price and value in use. In assessing the value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market
assessments of the time value of money and risks specific to the asset. In determining net selling price, recent market transactions are taken into account, if available. If no such transactions can be identified, an appropriate valuation model is used. After impairment, depreciation is provided on the revised carrying amount of the asset over its remaining useful life.
An impairment loss, if any, is charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss in the year in which an asset is identified as impaired. A previously recognised impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the assumptions used to determine the asset''s recoverable amount, since the last impairment loss was recognised. The reversal is limited, so that the carrying amount of the asset does not exceed its recoverable amount, nor exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is recognised in the Statement of Profit or Loss.
Borrowing costs, that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction, or production of a qualifying asset, are capitalised as a part of the cost of such asset till such time the asset is ready for its intended use. A qualifying asset is an asset that necessarily requires a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale.
All other borrowing costs are expensed in the period in which they occur at amortised cost using Effective Interest Rate (EIR).
Borrowing costs consist of interest and other costs that an entity incurs in connection with borrowing funds.
Current Tax
Current tax assets and liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from, or paid to, the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted, or substantively enacted, by the reporting date in the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961.
Current income tax relating to items recognised directly in equity is recognised in equity and not in the Statement of Profit and Loss. The Management periodically
evaluates positions taken in the tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulations are subject to interpretation and establishes provisions, where appropriate.
Deferred Tax
Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes at the reporting date.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred tax asset to be utilised. Unrecognised deferred tax assets are re-assessed at each reporting date, and are recognised to the extent that it becomes probable that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the year when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.
Deferred tax relating to items recognised outside profit or loss account is recognised either in OCI or in equity. Deferred tax items are recognised in correlation to the underlying transaction either in OCI or directly in equity.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.
Indirect Taxes
Goods and Services Tax paid is on acquisition of assets or on incurring expenses. Expenses and assets are recognised net of the Goods and Services Tax paid, except:
⢠When the input tax credit for tax incurred on a purchase of assets or services cannot be availed, in which case the tax paid is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the respective expense item, as applicable.
⢠When receivables and payables are recorded with the amount of tax included.
The net amount of tax recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as a part of receivables or payables in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
E. Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) and Investment Property
All items of property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost, net of accumulated depreciation and impairment loss, if any. The cost comprises the purchase price and any attributable cost of bringing the asset to its working condition for its intended use, including relevant borrowing costs and any expected costs of decommissioning.
The cost of an item of PPE is recognised as an asset if, and only if, it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Company in future periods, and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. Expenditure incurred after the PPE have been put into operations, such as repair and maintenance expenses, are charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss, during the period in which they are incurred. PPE, individually costing less than Rupees five thousand, are fully depreciated in the year of purchase.
An item of property, plant and equipment and any significant part initially recognised is derecognised upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected from its use or disposal. Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset) is included in the Statement of Profit and Loss, when the asset is derecognised. The date of disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment is the date the recipient obtains control of that item in accordance with the requirements for determining when a performance obligation is satisfied in Ind AS 115.
Depreciation on the property, plant and equipment is provided on straight-line method using the rates arrived as per estimates made by the Management, supported by technical assessment, which coincides with the useful lives of assets as specified in Schedule II of the Companies Act, 2013, except for the assets specified below. The Company has used the following useful lives of the property, plant and equipment to provide depreciation.
|
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: |
||
|
Asset |
Useful Life as Prescribed by Schedule II of the Companies Act, 2013 |
Estimated Useful Life by the Company |
|
Office Computers and Electronic Equipment (including Plant & Machinery) |
3 Years |
4 Years |
|
Vehicles |
8 Years |
5 Years |
|
Furniture, Fixtures and Other Office Equipment |
10 Years |
7 Years |
|
Office Equipment |
5 Years |
4 Years |
|
Leasehold Improvements |
Over the primary Lower of 3 Years period of the lease or primary period |
|
Useful life of assets different from prescribed in Schedule II has been estimated by the Management, supported by technical assessment.
Depreciation on assets acquired/sold during the year is recognised on a pro-rata basis to the Statement of Profit and Loss from/till the date of acquisition or sale.
The residual values, useful lives and methods of depreciation of property, plant and equipment are reviewed at each financial year end and adjusted prospectively, if appropriate.
Investment property is property held to earn rentals and/or for capital appreciation (including property under construction for such purposes). Investment property is measured initially at cost, including transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, investment property is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any.
The Company, based on technical assessment made by the Management, depreciates the building on a straightline basis overestimated useful lives of 60 years. The Management believes that these estimated useful lives are realistic and reflect fair approximation of the period over which the assets are likely to be used.
|
Useful Life as |
||
|
Asset Category |
Prescribed by Schedule II of the Companies Act, 2013 |
Estimated Useful Life |
|
Investment Property |
60 Years |
60 Years |
Though the Company measures investment property, using cost-based measurement, the fair value of investment property is disclosed in Note No. 12.
F. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets acquired separately are measured on initial recognition at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is their fair value at the date of acquisition. Following initial recognition, intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses, if any. Intangible assets are amortised on straight-line basis over a period of 3 years. The useful lives of intangible assets are assessed as finite.
Intangible assets with finite lives are amortised over the useful economic life and assessed for impairment, whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The amortisation period and the amortisation method for an intangible asset with a finite useful life are reviewed at least at the end of each reporting period. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset are considered to modify the amortisation period or method, as appropriate, and are treated as changes in accounting estimates. The amortisation expense on intangible assets with finite lives is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless such expenditure forms part of carrying value of another asset.
Gains or losses from derecognition of intangible assets are measured as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset, and are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, when the asset is derecognised.
Intangible assets not ready for the intended use on the date of Balance Sheet are disclosed as intangible assets under development.
Intangible assets and their useful lives are as under:
|
Assets |
Estimate Useful Life |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exclusive Images |
3 Years |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Computer Software |
Mar 31, 2024
The Company presents its financial statements to comply with Division III of Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013, which provides general instructions for the preparation of financial statements of a non-banking financial company (NBFC to comply with Ind AS) and the requirements of Ind AS. An analysis regarding recovery or settlement within 12 months after the reporting date (current) and more than 12 months after the reporting date (non-current) is presented in Note No. 42. Financial assets and financial liabilities are generally reported gross in the Balance Sheet. They are only offset and reported net when, in addition to having an unconditional legally enforceable right to offset the recognised amounts without being contingent on a future event, the parties also intend to settle on a net basis in all of the following circumstances: ⢠The normal course of business, and ⢠The event of default. Amounts in the financial statements are presented in Indian Rupees in Crore rounded off to two decimal places as permitted by Division III of Schedule III of the Act, except when otherwise indicated. A financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity, and a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity. Initial Recognition and Measurement All financial assets are recognised initially at fair value. Further, in the case of financial assets not recorded at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs, that are attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset, are added to the fair value. However, trade receivables that do not contain a significant financing component are measured at transaction price. Subsequent Measurement For the purposes of subsequent measurement, financial assets are classified in four categories: ⢠Debt instruments at amortised cost, ⢠Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI), ⢠Debt instruments, derivatives and equity instruments and mutual funds at fair value, through profit or loss (FVTPL), and ⢠Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI). Debt Instruments at Amortised Cost A ''debt instrument'' is measured at the amortised cost, if both the following conditions are met: a) The asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets for collecting contractual cash flows, and b) Contractual terms of the asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are Solely Payments of Principal and Interest (SPPI) on the principal amount outstanding. After initial measurement, such financial assets are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate (EIR) method. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation is included in finance income in the Statement of Profit and Loss. The losses arising from impairment are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Debt Instruments at FVTOCI A ''debt instrument'' is classified as at the FVTOCI, if both of the following criteria are met: a) The objective of the business model is achieved both by collecting contractual cash flows and selling the financial assets, and b) The asset''s contractual cash flows represent Solely Payments of Principal and Interest (SPPI). Debt instruments, included within the FVTOCI category, are measured initially, as well as at each reporting date at fair value. Fair value movements are recognised in the other comprehensive income (OCI). However, the Company recognises interest income, impairment losses and reversals, and foreign exchange gain or loss in the Statement of Profit and Loss. On derecognition of the asset, cumulative gain or loss, previously recognised in OCI, is reclassified from the equity to the Statement of Profit and Loss. Interest earned, whilst holding FVTOCI debt instrument, is reported as interest income using the EIR method. Debt Instruments at FVTPL FVTPL is a residual category for debt instruments. Any debt instrument, which does not meet the criteria for categorisation as at amortised cost or as FVTOCI, is classified as at FVTPL. In addition, the Company may elect to designate a debt instrument, which otherwise meets amortised cost or FVTOCI criteria, as at FVTPL. However, such election is allowed only if doing so reduces or eliminates a measurement or recognition inconsistency (referred to as ''accounting mismatch''). Debt instruments included within the FVTPL category are measured at fair value with all changes recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Equity Investments Investments in Subsidiaries, Associates and Joint Ventures are out of scope of Ind AS 109, and, hence, the Company has accounted for its investments in Subsidiaries, Associates and Joint Ventures at cost. All other equity investments are measured at fair value. Equity instruments, which are held for trading, are classified as at FVTPL. For equity instruments, other than held for trading, the Company has irrevocable option to present in OCI, subsequent changes in the fair value. The Company makes such election on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The classification is made on initial recognition, and is irrevocable. Where the Company classifies equity instruments as at FVTOCI, then all fair value changes on the instrument, excluding dividends, are recognised in the OCI. There is no recycling of the amounts from OCI to the Statement of Profit and Loss, even on sale of investments. Equity instruments, included within the FVTPL category, are measured at fair value with all changes recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Impairment of Financial Assets The Company recognises loss allowances for ECLs on the following financial instruments that are not measured at FVTPL: ⢠Loans and advances to customers; ⢠Debt investment securities; ⢠Trade and other receivables; ⢠Lease receivables; ⢠Irrevocable loan commitments issued; and ⢠Financial guarantee contracts issued. With the exception of Purchased or Originated Credit-Impaired (POCI) financial assets (which are considered separately below), ECLs are required to be measured through a loss allowance at an amount equal to: ⢠12-month ECL, i.e., that results from those default events on the financial instrument that are possible within 12 months after the reporting date (referred to as Stage 1); or ⢠full lifetime ECL, i.e., lifetime ECL that results from all possible default events over the life of the financial instrument (referred to as Stage 2 and Stage 3). A loss allowance for full lifetime ECL is required for a financial instrument, if the credit risk on that financial instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition (and consequently for credit impaired financial assets). For all other financial instruments, ECLs are measured at an amount equal to the 12-month ECL. The Company''s policy is always to measure loss allowances for lease receivables as lifetime ECL. ECLs are a probability-weighted estimate of the present value of credit losses. These are measured as the present value of the difference between the cash flows due to the Company under the contract and the cash flows that the Company expects to receive arising from the weighting of multiple future economic scenarios, discounted at the asset''s EIR. ⢠For undrawn loan commitments, the ECL is the difference between the present value of the difference between the contractual cash flows that are due to the Company, if the holder of the commitment draws down the loan, and the cash flows that the Company expects to receive, if the loan is drawn down; and ⢠For financial guarantee contracts, the ECL is the difference between the expected payments to reimburse the holder of the guaranteed debt instrument less any amounts that the Company expects to receive from the holder, the debtor or any other party. The Company measures ECL on an individual basis, or on a collective basis for portfolios of loans that share similar economic risk characteristics. The measurement of the loss allowance is based on the present value of the asset''s expected cash flows using the asset''s original EIR, regardless of whether it is measured on an individual basis or a collective basis. Credit-Impaired Financial Assets A financial asset is ''credit-impaired'' when one or more events, that have a detrimental impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset, have occurred. Credit-impaired financial assets are referred to as Stage 3 assets. Evidence of credit-impairment includes observable data about the following events: ⢠Significant financial difficulty of the borrower or issuer; ⢠A breach of contract such as a default or past due event; ⢠The lender of the borrower, for economic or contractual reasons relating to the borrower''s financial difficulty, having granted to the borrower a concession that the lender would not otherwise consider; ⢠The disappearance of an active market for a security because of financial difficulties; or ⢠The purchase of a financial asset at a deep discount that reflects the incurred credit losses. It may not be possible to identify a single discrete event, instead, the combined effect of several events may have caused financial assets to become credit-impaired. The Company assesses whether debt instruments that are financial assets measured at amortised cost or FVTOCI are credit-impaired at each reporting date. To assess if corporate debt instruments are credit impaired, the Company considers factors such as bond yields, credit ratings and the ability of the borrower to raise funding. A loan is considered credit-impaired when a concession is granted to the borrower due to a deterioration in the borrower''s financial condition, unless there is evidence that, as a result of granting the concession, the risk of not receiving the contractual cash flows has reduced significantly, and there are no other indicators of impairment. For financial assets, where concessions are contemplated but not granted, the asset is deemed credit-impaired when there is observable evidence of credit-impairment, including meeting the definition of default. The definition of default (see below) includes unlikeliness to pay indicators and a back-stop, if amounts are overdue for 90 days or more. Purchased or Originated Credit-Impaired (POCI) Financial Assets POCI financial assets are treated differently because the asset is credit-impaired at initial recognition. For these assets, the Company recognises all changes in lifetime ECL since initial recognition as a loss allowance with any changes recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. A favourable change for such assets creates an impairment gain. Definition of Default Critical to the determination of ECL is the definition of default. The definition of default is used in measuring the amount of ECL and in the determination of whether the loss allowance is based on 12-month or lifetime ECL, as default is a component of the probability of default (PD), which affects both the measurement of ECLs and the identification of a significant increase in credit risk. The Company considers the following as constituting an event of default: ⢠The borrower is past due more than 90 days on any material credit obligation to the Company; or ⢠The borrower is unlikely to pay its credit obligations to the Company in full. The definition of default is appropriately tailored to reflect different characteristics of different types of assets. When assessing, if the borrower is unlikely to pay its credit obligation, the Company takes into account both qualitative and quantitative indicators. The information assessed depends on the type of the asset, e.g., in corporate lending a qualitative indicator used is the admittance of bankruptcy petition by National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), which is not relevant for retail lending. Quantitative indicators, such as overdue status and non-payment on another obligation of the same counterparty, are key inputs in this analysis. The Company uses a variety of sources of information to assess default, which are either developed internally or obtained from external sources. The definition of default is applied consistently to all financial instruments, unless information becomes available that demonstrates that another default definition is more appropriate for a particular financial instrument. Significant Increase in Credit Risk The Company monitors all financial assets, issued irrevocable loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts that are subject to the impairment requirements to assess whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk, since initial recognition. If there has been a significant increase in credit risk, the Company will measure the loss allowance based on lifetime rather than 12-month ECL. The Company''s accounting policy is not to use the practical expedient that the financial assets with ''low'' credit risk at the reporting date are deemed not to have had a significant increase in credit risk. As a result, the Company monitors all financial assets, issued irrevocable loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts that are subject to impairment for significant increase in credit risk. In assessing whether the credit risk on a financial instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition, the Company compares the risk of a default occurring on the financial instrument at the reporting date based on the remaining maturity of the instrument with the risk of a default occurring that was anticipated for the remaining maturity at the current reporting date when the financial instrument was first recognised. In making this assessment, the Company considers both quantitative and qualitative information that is reasonable and supportable, including historical experience and forwardlooking information, that is available without undue cost or effort, based on the Company''s historical experience and expert credit assessment. Given that a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition is a relative measure, a given change, in absolute terms, in the probability of default (PD) will be more significant for a financial instrument with a lower initial PD than compared to a financial instrument with a higher PD. Modification and Derecognition of Financial Assets A modification of a financial asset occurs when the contractual terms, governing the cash flows of a financial asset, are renegotiated or otherwise modified between initial recognition and maturity of the financial asset. A modification affects the amount and/or timing of the contractual cash flows, either immediately or at a future date. In addition, the introduction or adjustment of existing covenants of an existing loan may constitute a modification even if these new or adjusted covenants do not yet affect the cash flows immediately, but may affect the cash flows depending on whether the covenant is or is not met (e.g., a change to the increase in the interest rate that arises when covenants are breached). The Company renegotiates loans to customers in financial difficulty to maximise collection and minimise the risk of default. A loan forbearance is granted in cases where, although, the borrower made all reasonable efforts to pay under the original contractual terms, there is a high risk of default, or default has already happened, and the borrower is expected to be able to meet the revised terms. The revised terms, in most of the cases, include an extension of the maturity of the loan, changes to the timing of the cash flows of the loan (principal and interest repayment), reduction in the amount of cash flows due (principal and interest forgiveness) and amendments to covenants. When a financial asset is modified the Company assesses whether this modification results in derecognition. In accordance with the Company''s policy, a modification results in derecognition when it gives rise to substantially different terms. To determine if the modified terms are substantially different from the original contractual terms, the Company considers the following: ⢠Qualitative factors, such as contractual cash flows after modification, are no longer SPPI, ⢠change in currency or change of counterparty, and ⢠the extent of change in interest rates, maturity, covenants. If these do not clearly indicate a substantial modification, then; A. In the case where the financial asset is derecognised, the loss allowance for ECL is remeasured at the date of derecognition to determine the net carrying amount of the asset at that date. The difference between this revised carrying amount and the fair value of the new financial asset with the new terms will lead to a gain or loss on derecognition. The new financial asset will have a loss allowance measured based on 12-month ECL, except in the rare occasions where the new loan is considered to be originated credit-impaired. This applies only in the case where the fair value of the new loan is recognised at a significant discount to its revised par amount, because there remains a high risk of default, which has not been reduced by the modification. The Company monitors credit risk of modified financial assets by evaluating qualitative and quantitative information, such as if the borrower is in the past due status under the new terms. B. When the contractual terms of a financial asset are modified and the modification does not result in derecognition, the Company determines if the financial asset''s credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition by comparing: ⢠the remaining lifetime PD estimated based on the data at initial recognition and the original contractual terms; with ⢠the remaining lifetime PD at the reporting date based on the modified terms. For financial assets modified, where modification did not result in derecognition, the estimate of PD reflects the Company''s ability to collect the modified cash flows taking into account the Company''s previous experience of similar forbearance action, as well as various behavioural indicators, including the borrower''s payment performance against the modified contractual terms. If the credit risk remains significantly higher than what was expected at initial recognition the loss allowance will continue to be measured at an amount equal to lifetime ECL. The loss allowance on forborne loans will generally only be measured based on 12-month ECL, when there is evidence of the borrower''s improved repayment behaviour following modification leading to a reversal of the previous significant increase in credit risk. Where a modification does not lead to derecognition, the Company calculates the modification gain/loss comparing the gross carrying amount before and after the modification (excluding the ECL allowance). Then the Company measures ECL for the modified asset, where the expected cash flows, arising from the modified financial asset, are included in calculating the expected cash shortfalls from the original asset. The Company derecognises a financial asset only when the contractual rights to the asset''s cash flows expire (including expiry arising from a modification with substantially different terms), or when the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset are transferred to another entity. If the Company neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and continues to control the transferred asset, the Company recognises its retained interest in the asset and an associated liability for amounts it may have to pay. If the Company retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a transferred financial asset, the Company continues to recognise the financial asset, and also recognises a collateralised borrowing for the proceeds received. On derecognition of a financial asset in its entirety, the difference between the asset''s carrying amount and the sum of the consideration received and receivable, and the cumulative gain/loss that had been recognised in OCI and accumulated in equity is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, with the exception of equity investment designated as measured at FVTOCI, where the cumulative gain/loss previously recognised in OCI is not subsequently reclassified to the Statement of Profit and Loss. On derecognition of a financial asset other than in its entirety (e.g., when the Company retains an option to repurchase part of a transferred asset), the Company allocates the previous carrying amount of the financial asset between the part it continues to recognise under continuing involvement and the part it no longer recognises on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts on the date of the transfer. The difference between the carrying amount allocated to the part, that is no longer recognised, and the sum of the consideration received for the part no longer recognised, and any cumulative gain/loss allocated to it, that had been recognised in OCI, is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. A cumulative gain/loss that had been recognised in OCI is allocated between the part that continues to be recognised and the part that is no longer recognised on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts. This does not apply for equity investments designated as measured at FVTOCI, as the cumulative gain/loss previously recognised in OCI is not subsequently reclassified to the Statement of Profit and Loss. Write Off Loans and debt securities are written off when the Company has no reasonable expectations of recovering the financial asset (either in its entirety or a portion of it). This is the case when the Company determines that the borrower does not have assets or sources of income that could generate sufficient cash flows to repay the amounts, subject to the write-off. A write-off constitutes a derecognition event. The Company may apply enforcement activities to the financial assets written off. Recoveries resulting from the Company''s enforcement activities will result in impairment gains. Presentation of Allowance for ECL in the Statement of Balance Sheet Loss allowances for ECL are presented in the Statement of Balance Sheet as follows: ⢠for financial assets measured at amortised cost: as a deduction from the gross carrying amount of the assets; and ⢠for debt instruments measured at FVTOCI: no loss allowance is recognised in the Balance Sheet as the carrying amount is at fair value. Where a financial instrument includes both a drawn and an undrawn component, and the Company cannot identify the ECL on the loan commitment component separately from those on the drawn component, the Company presents a combined loss allowance for both components. The combined amount is presented as a deduction from the gross carrying amount of the drawn component. Derecognition of Financial Assets The Company derecognises a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or when it transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset to another party. If the Company neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and continues to control the transferred asset, the Company recognises its retained interest in the asset and an associated liability for amounts it may have to pay. If the Company retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a transferred financial asset, the Company continues to recognise the financial asset and also recognises an associated liability. On derecognition of a financial asset in its entirety, the difference between the asset''s carrying amount and the sum of the consideration received and receivable, and the cumulative gain or loss that had been recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, if such gain or loss would have otherwise been recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on disposal of that financial assets. On derecognition of a financial asset other than in its entirety (e.g., when the Company retains an option to repurchase part of a transferred asset), the Company allocates the previous carrying amount of the financial assets between the part it continues to recognise under continuing involvement, and the part is no longer recognises on the basis of relative fair values of those parts on the date of transfer. The difference between the carrying amount allocated to the part that is no longer recognised and the sum of consideration received for the part no longer recognised and any cumulative gain or loss allocated to it that had been recognised in other comprehensive income is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, if such gain/loss would have otherwise been recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on disposal in the Statement of Profit and Loss, if such gain/loss would have otherwise been recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on disposal of that financial asset. A cumulative gain or loss that had been recognised in other comprehensive income is allocated between the part that continues to be recognised and the part that is no longer recognised on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts. Financial Liabilities and Equity Instruments Classification as Debt or Equity Debt and equity instruments, issued by the Company, are classified as either financial liabilities or as equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangements and the definitions of a financial liability and an equity instrument. Equity Instruments An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Company after deducting all of its liabilities. Equity instruments issued by the Company are recognised at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs. Financial Liabilities Financial liabilities are classified, at initial recognition: ⢠At fair value through profit or loss, except: ⢠Loans and borrowings, ⢠Payables, or ⢠As derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge, as appropriate. All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value, and in the case of loans and borrowings, and payables are recognised net of directly attributable transaction costs. The Company''s financial liabilities include trade and other payables, loans and borrowings, including bank overdrafts, financial guarantee contracts and derivative financial instruments. Subsequent Measurements The measurement of financial liabilities depends on its classification, as described below: Financial Liabilities at FVTPL Financial liabilities at FVTPL include financial liabilities held for trading and financial liabilities designated upon initial recognition as at FVTPL. Financial liabilities are classified as held for trading, if they are incurred for the purpose of repurchasing in the near term. This category also includes derivative financial instruments entered into by the Company that are not designated as hedging instruments in hedge relationships as defined by Ind AS 109. Separated embedded derivatives are also classified as held for trading, unless they are designated as effective hedging instruments. Gains or losses on liabilities held for trading are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Financial liabilities, designated upon initial recognition at FVTPL, are designated as such at the initial date of recognition, and only if the criteria in Ind AS 109 are satisfied. Loans and Borrowings After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the Effective Interest Rate (EIR) method. Gains and losses are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss when the liabilities are derecognised, as well as through the EIR amortisation process. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation is included as finance costs in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Derecognition of Financial Liabilities The Company derecognises financial liabilities when, and only when, the Company''s obligations are discharged, cancelled or have expired. The difference between the carrying amount of the financial liability derecognised and the consideration paid and payable is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Offsetting of Financial Instruments Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset, and the net amount is reported in the Balance Sheet, if there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, to realise the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously. The Company measures financial instruments such as investments (other than equity investments in Subsidiaries, Joint Ventures and Associates) and derivatives at fair values at each Balance Sheet date. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement is based on the presumption that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either: a) In the principal market for the asset or liability, or b) In the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The principal or the most advantageous market must be accessible by the Company. The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest. A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participant''s ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use. The Company uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs. All assets and liabilities (for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial statements) are categorised within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole: For assets and liabilities that are recognised in the financial statements on a recurring basis, the Company determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by re-assessing categorisation (based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole) at the end of each reporting period. The Management determines the policies and procedures for both recurring fair value measurement, such as derivative instruments and unquoted financial assets measured at fair value, and for non-recurring measurement, such as assets held for disposal in discontinued operations. At each reporting date, the Management analyses the movements in the values of assets and liabilities, which are required to be remeasured or re-assessed as per the Company''s accounting policies. For this analysis, the Management verifies the major inputs applied in the latest valuation by agreeing the information in the valuation computation to contracts and other relevant documents. Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand and cash at banks, including fixed deposits with original maturity period of three months or less and short-term highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less, which are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value. Investment property are properties held to earn rentals and/or for capital appreciation (including property under construction for such purposes). Investment properties are measured initially at cost, including transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, investment properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any. The Company, based on technical assessment made by the Management, depreciates the building on a straightline basis over estimated useful lives of 60 years. The Management believes that these estimated useful lives are realistic and reflect fair approximation of the period over which the assets are likely to be used. â Useful Life as Prescribed by Schedule Estimated Asset Categoi-y || 0f the Companies Act, 2013 Useful Life Investment 60 Years 60 Years Property Though the Company measures investment property, using cost-based measurement, the fair value of investment property is disclosed in Note No. 56. On transition to Ind AS, the Company has elected to continue with the carrying value of all its PPE recognised as at 1st April 2017, measured as per the previous GAAP, and used that carrying value as the deemed cost of the PPE. PPE are stated at acquisition or construction cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment loss. Cost comprises the purchase price and any attributable cost of bringing the asset to its location and working condition for its intended use, including relevant borrowing costs and any expected costs of decommissioning. If significant parts of an item of PPE have different useful lives, then they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of PPE. The cost of an item of PPE is recognised as an asset if, and only if, it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Company in future periods, and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. Expenditure incurred after the PPE have been put into operations, such as repair and maintenance expenses, are charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss, during the period in which they are incurred. Depreciation on PPE is provided on Straight-Line Method using the rates arrived at based on the useful lives as specified in the Schedule II of the Companies Act, 2013, or estimated by the Management. The Company has used the following useful life to provide depreciation on its PPE. Useful life of assets different from the corresponding life specified in Schedule II has been estimated by the Management supported by technical assessments. The estimated useful lives and residual values of the PPE are reviewed at the end of each financial year. PPE, individually costing less than Rupees five thousand, are fully depreciated in the year of purchase. Depreciation on the PPE added/disposed off/discarded during the year is provided from/upto the date when added/disposed off/discarded. Gains or losses arising from the retirement or disposal of PPE are determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and recognised as income or expense in the Statement of Profit and Loss. On transition to Ind AS, the Company has elected to continue with the carrying value of all its Intangible Assets recognised as at 1st April 2017, measured as per the previous GAAP and used that carrying value as the deemed cost of the intangible assets. I ntangible assets acquired separately are measured on initial recognition at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is their fair value at the date of acquisition. Following initial recognition, intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses, if any. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortised over the useful economic life and assessed for impairment, whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The amortisation period and the amortisation method for an intangible asset with a finite useful life are reviewed at least at the end of each reporting period. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset are considered to modify the amortisation period or method, as appropriate, and are treated as changes in accounting estimates. The amortisation expense on intangible assets with finite lives is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless such expenditure forms part of carrying value of another asset. Intangible assets are amortised on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. I ntangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortised, but are tested for impairment annually, either individually or at the cash-generating unit level. The assessment of indefinite life is reviewed annually to determine whether the indefinite life continues to be supportable. If not, the change in useful life from indefinite to finite is made on a prospective basis. Gains or losses, arising from the retirement or disposal of an intangible asset, are determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset, and recognised as income or expense in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Intangible assets and their useful lives are as under: The estimated useful lives of the intangible assets and the amortisation period are reviewed at the end of each financial year, and the amortisation period is revised to reflect the changed pattern, if any. Research costs are expensed as incurred. Development expenditures on an individual project are recognised as an intangible asset when the Company can demonstrate: ⢠The technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset so that the asset will be available for use or sale; ⢠How the asset will generate future economic benefits; ⢠The availability of resources to complete the asset; and ⢠The ability to measure reliably the expenditure during development. Following initial recognition of the development expenditure as an asset, the asset is carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses. Amortisation of the asset begins when development is complete and the asset is available for use. It is amortised over the period of expected future benefits. Amortisation expenses are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless such expenditure forms part of carrying value of another asset. During the period of development, the asset is tested for impairment annually. At the end of each reporting period, the Company reviews the carrying amounts of non-financial assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). When it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. When a reasonable and consistent basis of allocation can be identified, corporate assets are also allocated to individual cash-generating units, or otherwise they are allocated to the smallest company of cashgenerating units, for which a reasonable and consistent allocation basis can be identified. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and intangible assets not yet available for use are tested for impairment, at least annually, and whenever there is an indication then the asset may be impaired. Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use. In assessing the value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset, for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted. If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised immediately in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease. When an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or a cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but, so that, the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset (or cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised immediately in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase. The determination of whether an arrangement is (or contains) a lease is based on the substance of the arrangement at the inception of the lease. The arrangement is, or contains, a lease if fulfilment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets, and the arrangement conveys a right-to-use the asset or assets, even if that right is not explicitly specified in an arrangement. The Company as a Lessee Leases, where substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item are transferred to the Lessee, are classified as finance lease. The assets acquired under finance lease are capitalised at lower of fair value, and present value of the minimum lease payments at the inception of the lease and disclosed as leased assets. Such assets are amortised over the period of lease or estimated life of such asset, whichever is less. Lease payments are apportioned between the finance charges and reduction of the lease liability based on implicit rate of return. Lease management fees, lease charges and other initial direct costs are capitalised. The Company as a Lessee The Company''s lease asset classes primarily consist of leases for land and buildings. The Company assesses whether a contract contains a lease, at inception of a contract. A contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. To assess whether a contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset, the Company assesses whether: (1) the contract involves the use of an identified asset; (2) the Company has substantially all of the economic benefits from use of the asset through the period of the lease; and (3) the Company has the right to direct the use of the asset. At the date of commencement of the lease, the Company recognises right-of-use ("ROU") asset and a corresponding lease liability for all lease arrangements in which it is a lessee, except for leases with a term of 12 months or less (short-term leases) and low value leases. For these shortterm and low value leases, the Company recognises the lease payments as an operating expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Certain lease arrangements include the options to extend or terminate the lease before the end of the lease term. ROU assets and lease liabilities include these options when it is reasonably certain that they will be exercised. Right-of-use assets are initially recognised at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for any lease payments made at or prior to the commencement date of the lease plus any initial direct costs less any lease incentives. They are subsequently measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Right-of-use assets are depreciated from the commencement date on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term and useful life of the under lying asset. Right-of-use assets are evaluated for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. For the purpose of impairment testing, the recoverable amount (i.e., the higher of the fair value less cost to sell and the value-in-use) is determined on an individual asset basis, unless the asset generates cash flows that are largely dependent of those from other assets. In such cases, the recoverable amount is determined for the CashGenerating Unit (CGU) to which the asset belongs. Lease liability is initially measured at amortised cost at the present value of the future lease payments. The lease payments are discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if not readily determinable, using the incremental borrowing rates in the country of domicile of the leases. Lease liabilities are remeasured with a corresponding adjustment to the related right-of-use assets, if the Company changes its assessment on exercise of an extension or a termination option. Lease liability and ROU asset have been separately presented in the Balance Sheet, and lease payments have been classified as financing cash flows. The Company as a Lessor Leases, for which the Company is a lessor, are classified as a finance or operating lease. Whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee, the contract is classified as a finance lease. All other leases are classified as operating leases. When the Company is an intermediate lessor, it accounts for its interests in the head lease and the sub-lease separately. The sub-lease is classified as a finance or operating lease by reference to the right-of-use asset arising from the head lease. For operating leases, rental income is recognised on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant lease. Liabilities for salaries, including non-monetary benefits and accumulating leave balance in respect of employees'' services upto the end of the reporting period, are recognised as liabilities (and expensed), and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. The Company also recognises a liability and records an expense for bonuses (including performance-linked bonuses) where contractually obliged or where there is a past practice that has created a constructive obligation. Provident Fund: The Company makes defined contributions to employee provident fund and employee pension schemes administered by government organisations, set up under the applicable statute. Superannuation Fund: Superannuation schemes administered by a trust set up by Grasim Industries Limited ("the Holding Company"). The obligation in respect of defined benefits plans, which covers Gratuity, which is provided for on the basis of an actuarial valuation at the end of each financial year. Gratuity is funded with an approved trust. In respect of Gratuity being post-retirement benefits, remeasurements, comprising actuarial gains and losses, the effect of changes to the asset ceiling (if applicable), and the return on plan assets (excluding net interest) are reflected immediately in the Balance Sheet with a charge or credit recognised in other comprehensive income in the period in which they occur. Remeasurement recognised in other comprehensive income is reflected immediately in retained earnings, and will not be reclassified to the Statement of Profit and Loss. Past service costs are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on the earlier of: ⢠the date of the plan amendment or curtailment, and ⢠the date that the Company recognises related restricting costs. The Company recognises the following changes in the net defined benefits obligation under employee benefit expenses in the Statement of Profit and Loss: ⢠service cost (including current service cost, past service cost, as well as gains and losses on curtailments and settlements); and ⢠net interest expense or income. The Company presents the above two components of defined benefit costs in the Statement of Profit and Loss in the line item ''Employee Benefits Expenses''. The present value of the defined benefit plans liability is calculated using a discount rate, which is determined by reference to market yields at the end of the reporting period on government bonds. The retirement benefit obligation recognised in the Balance Sheet represents the actual deficit or surplus in the Company''s defined benefits plans. Any surplus resulting from this calculation is limited to the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plans or reductions in the future contribution to the plans. The expected costs of other long-term employee benefits, such as long-term service incentive plan benefits (not being share-based payments), are accrued over the period of employment using the same accounting methodology as used for defined benefits plans. Remeasurement gains and losses, arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions, are charged or credited to the Statement of Profit and Loss in the period in which they arise. Equity-settled share-based payments to employees are measured by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the grant date using Black-Scholes Model. The fair value, determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments, is charged to profit and loss on the straight-line basis over the vesting period of the option, based on the Company''s estimate of equity instruments that will eventually vest with a corresponding increase in equity. In case of forfeiture/lapse stock option, which is not vested, the amortised portion is reversed by credit to employee compensation expense. In situation where the stock option expires unexercised, the related balance standing to the credit of the Employee Stock Options Outstanding Account is transferred within equity. Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the rate of exchange prevailing on the date of transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the functional currency at rates of exchange on the reporting date. Exchange difference on restatement of all other monetary items is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefit will flow to the Company and the revenue can be reliably measured and there exists reasonable certainty of its recovery. a) Dividend income is accounted for when the right to receive the income is established. b) Interest income is accounted for all financial instruments measured at amortised cost or at fair value through other comprehensive income. Interest income is recorded using the EIR which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash flows of the financial instrument through the expected life of the financial instrument or, where appropriate, a shorter period, to the net carrying amount. The future cash flows are estimated taking into account all the contractual terms of the instrument. The calculation of the EIR includes all fees paid or received between parties to the contract that are incremental and directly attributable to the specific lending arrangement, transaction costs, and all other premiums or discounts. For financial assets measured at fair value through profit and loss ("FVTPL"), transaction costs are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss at initial recognition. Interest income on all trading assets and financial assets, mandatorily required to be measured at FVTPL, is recognised using the contractual interest rate in net gain on fair value changes. Borrowing costs, attributable to acquisition and construction of qualifying assets, are capitalised as a part of the cost of such assets upto the date when such assets are ready for its intended use. Other borrowing costs are charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss in the period in which they are incurred. Current tax assets and liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from, or paid to, the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted, or substantively enacted, by the reporting date in the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961. Current income tax relating to items recognised outside profit or loss is recognised outside profit or loss (either in other comprehensive income or in equity). Current tax items are recognised in correlation to the underlying transaction either in OCI or directly in equity. Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences at the reporting date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities, and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes at the reporting date. Deferred tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, the carry forward of unused tax credits and any unused tax losses. Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, and the carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilised. The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred tax asset to be utilised. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the year when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset, if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred taxes relate to the same taxation authority.
Mar 31, 2023
1. GENERAL INFORMATION AND BASIS OF PREPARATION Aditya Birla Capital Limited (âthe Companyâ) is a listed public company having its registered office at Indian Rayon Compound, Veraval - 362 266, Gujarat. The Company currently operates as a Non-Deposit Taking Core Investment Company registered with the RBI vide certificate no. B.01.00555, dated 16th October 2015. The Company is a majority owned subsidiary of Grasim Industries Limited. I nformation on other related party relationships of the Company is provided refer Note No. 37. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Indian Accounting Standards ("Ind ASâ) notified under Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Actâ), read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended from time to time. The financial statements are authorised for issue by the Board of Directors of the Company at its meeting held on 11th May 2023. The financial statements have been prepared and presented on the going concern basis, the relevant provisions of the act and the guidelines and directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to the extent applicable. The financial statements have been prepared at historical cost, except for the following assets and liabilities, which have been subsequently measured at fair value: ⢠Derivative Financial Instruments measured at fair value. ⢠Certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. ⢠Employeeâs Defined Benefits Plans as per actuarial valuation. 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 2.1 Presentation of Financial Statements The Company presents its financial statements to comply with Division III of Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013, which provides general instructions for the preparation of financial statements of a non-banking financial company (NBFC to comply with Ind AS) and the requirements of Ind AS. An analysis regarding recovery or settlement within 12 months after the reporting date (current) and more
than 12 months after the reporting date (non-current) is presented in Note No. 42. Financial assets and financial liabilities are generally reported gross in the Balance Sheet. They are only offset and reported net when, in addition to having an unconditional legally enforceable right to offset the recognised amounts without being contingent on a future event, the parties also intend to settle on a net basis in all of the following circumstances: ⢠The normal course of business, and ⢠The event of default. 2.2 Functional and Presentation Currency Amounts in the financial statements are presented in Indian Rupees in crore rounded off to two decimal places as permitted by Division III of Schedule III of the Act, except when otherwise indicated. A financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity, and a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity. Initial Recognition and Measurement All financial assets are recognised initially at fair value. Further, in the case of financial assets not recorded at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs, that are attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset, are added to the fair value. However, trade receivables that do not contain a significant financing component are measured at transaction price. Purchases or sales of financial assets that require delivery of assets within a time frame established by regulation or convention in the market place (regular way trades), are recognised on the trade date, i.e., the date that the Company commits to purchase or sell the asset. All financial assets are recognised initially at fair value. Further, in the case of financial assets not recorded at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs, that are attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset, are added to the fair value. However, trade receivables that do not contain a significant financing component are measured at transaction price. Subsequent MeasurementFor the purposes of subsequent measurement, financial assets are classified in four categories: ⢠Debt instruments at amortised cost, ⢠Debt in struments at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI), ⢠Debt instruments, derivatives and equity instruments and mutual funds at fair value, through profit or loss (FVTPL), and ⢠Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI). Debt Instruments at Amortised CostA âdebt instrumentâ is measured at the amortised cost, if both the following conditions are met: a) The asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets for collecting contractual cash flows, and b) Contractual terms of the asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are Solely Payments of Principal and Interest (SPPI) on the principal amount outstanding. After initial measurement, such financial assets are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate (EIR) method. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation is included in finance income in the Statement of Profit and Loss. The losses arising from impairment are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Debt Instruments at FVTOCIA âdebt instrumentâ is classified as at the FVTOCI, if both of the following criteria are met: a) The objective of the business model is achieved, both by collecting contractual cash flows and selling the financial assets, and b) The assetâs contractual cash flows represent Solely Payments of Principal and Interest (SPPI). Debt instruments, included within the FVTOCI category, are measured initially, as well as at each reporting date at fair value. Fair value movements are recognised in the other comprehensive income (OCI). However, the Company recognises interest income, impairment losses and reversals, and foreign exchange gain or loss in the Statement of Profit and Loss. On derecognition of the asset, cumulative gain or loss, previously recognised in OCI, is reclassified from the equity to the Statement of Profit and Loss. Interest earned whilst holding FVTOCI debt instrument is reported as interest income using the EIR method. Debt Instruments at FVTPLFVTPL is a residual category for debt instruments. Any debt instrument, which does not meet the criteria for categorisation as at amortised cost or as FVTOCI, is classified as at FVTPL. I n addition, the Company may elect to designate a debt instrument, which otherwise meets amortised cost or FVTOCI criteria, as at FVTPL. However, such election is allowed only if doing so reduces or eliminates a measurement or recognition inconsistency (referred to as âaccounting mismatchâ). Debt instruments included within the FVTPL category are measured at fair value with all changes recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Equity InvestmentsInvestments in Subsidiaries, Associates and Joint Ventures are out of scope of Ind AS 109, and, hence, the Company has accounted for its investments in Subsidiaries, Associates and Joint Ventures at cost. All other equity investments are measured at fair value. Equity instruments, which are held for trading, are classified as at FVTPL. For equity instruments, other than held for trading, the Company has irrevocable option to present in OCI, subsequent changes in the fair value. The Company makes such election on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The classification is made on initial recognition and is irrevocable. Where the Company classifies equity instruments as at FVTOCI, then all fair value changes on the instrument, excluding dividends, are recognised in the OCI. There is no recycling of the amounts from OCI to the Statement of Profit and Loss, even on sale of investment. Equity instruments, included within the FVTPL category, are measured at fair value with all changes recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Impairment of Financial AssetsThe Company recognises loss allowances for ECLs on the following financial instruments that are not measured at FVTPL: ⢠Loans and advances to customers; ⢠Debt investment securities; ⢠Trade and other receivables; ⢠Lease receivables; ⢠Irrevocable loan commitments issued; and ⢠Financial guarantee contracts issued. With the exception of Purchased or Originated Credit-Impaired (POCI) financial assets (which are considered separately below), ECLs are required to be measured through a loss allowance at an amount equal to: ⢠12-month ECL, i.e., that results from those default events on the financial instrument that are possible within 12 months after the reporting date (referred to as Stage 1); or ⢠full lifetime ECL, i.e., lifetime ECL that results from all possible default events over the life of the financial instrument (referred to as Stage 2 and Stage 3). A loss allowance for full lifetime ECL is required for a financial instrument, if the credit risk on that financial instrument has increased significantly, since initial recognition (and consequently for credit impaired financial assets). For all other financial instruments, ECLs are measured at an amount equal to the 12-month ECL. The Companyâs policy is always to measure loss allowances for lease receivables as lifetime ECL. ECLs are a probability-weighted estimate of the present value of credit losses. These are measured as the present value of the difference between the cash flows due to the Company under the contract and the cash flows that the Company expects to receive arising from the weighting of multiple future economic scenarios, discounted at the assetâs EIR. ⢠For undrawn loan commitments, the ECL is the difference between the present value of the difference between the contractual cash flows that are due to the Company, if the holder of the commitment draws down the loan, and the cash flows that the Company expects to receive, if the loan is drawn down; and ⢠For financial guarantee contracts, the ECL is the difference between the expected payments to reimburse the holder of the guaranteed debt instrument less any amounts that the Company expects to receive from the holder, the debtor or any other party. The Company measures ECL on an individual basis, or on a collective basis for portfolios of loans that share similar economic risk characteristics. The measurement of the loss allowance is based on the present value of the assetâs expected cash flows using the assetâs original EIR, regardless of whether it is measured on an individual basis or a collective basis. Credit-Impaired Financial AssetsA financial asset is âcredit-impairedâ when one or more events, that have a detrimental impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset, have occurred. Credit-impaired financial assets are referred to as Stage 3 assets. Evidence of credit-impairment includes observable data about the following events: ⢠significant financial difficulty of the borrower or issuer; ⢠a breach of contract such as a default or past due event; ⢠the lender of the borrower, for economic or contractual reasons relating to the borrowerâs financial difficulty, having granted to the borrower a concession that the lender would not otherwise consider; ⢠the disappearance of an active market for a security because of financial difficulties; or ⢠the purchase of a financial asset at a deep discount that reflects the incurred credit losses. It may not be possible to identify a single discrete event, instead, the combined effect of several events may have caused financial assets to become credit-impaired. The Company assesses whether debt instruments, that are financial assets measured at amortised cost or FVTOCI, are credit-impaired at each reporting date. To assess if corporate debt instruments are credit impaired, the Company considers factors such as bond yields, credit ratings and the ability of the borrower to raise funding. A loan is considered credit-impaired when a concession is granted to the borrower due to a deterioration in the borrowerâs financial condition, unless there is evidence that, as a result of granting the concession, the risk of not receiving the contractual cash flows has reduced significantly, and there are no other indicators of impairment. For financial assets, where concessions are contemplated but not granted, the asset is deemed credit-impaired when there is observable evidence of credit-impairment, including meeting the definition of default. The definition of default (see below) includes unlikeliness to pay indicators and a back-stop, if amounts are overdue for 90 days or more. Purchased or Originated Credit-Impaired (POCI) Financial AssetsPOCI financial assets are treated differently because the asset is credit-impaired at initial recognition. For these assets, the Company recognises all changes in lifetime ECL since initial recognition as a loss allowance with any changes recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. A favourable change for such assets creates an impairment gain. Definition of DefaultCritical to the determination of ECL is the definition of default. The definition of default is used in measuring the amount of ECL and in the determination of whether the loss allowance is based on 12-month or lifetime ECL, as default is a component of the probability of default (PD), which affects both the measurement of ECLs and the identification of a significant increase in credit risk. The Company considers the following as constituting an event of default: ⢠the borrower is past due more than 90 days on any material credit obligation to the Company; or ⢠the borrower is unlikely to pay its credit obligations to the Company in full. The definition of default is appropriately tailored to reflect different characteristics of different types of assets. When assessing, if the borrower is unlikely to pay its credit obligation, the Company takes into account both qualitative and quantitative indicators. The information assessed depends on the type of the asset, e.g., in corporate lending a qualitative indicator used is the admittance of bankruptcy petition by National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), which is not relevant for retail lending. Quantitative indicators, such as overdue status and nonpayment on another obligation of the same counterparty, are key inputs in this analysis. The Company uses a variety of sources of information to assess default, which are either developed internally or obtained from external sources. The definition of default is applied consistently to all financial instruments, unless information becomes available that demonstrates that another default definition is more appropriate for a particular financial instrument. Significant Increase in Credit RiskThe Company monitors all financial assets, issued irrevocable loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts that are subject to the impairment requirements to assess whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk, since initial recognition. If there has been a significant increase in credit risk, the Company will measure the loss allowance based on lifetime rather than 12-month ECL. The Companyâs accounting policy is not to use the practical expedient that the financial assets with âlowâ credit risk at the reporting date are deemed not to have had a significant increase in credit risk. As a result, the Company monitors all financial assets, issued irrevocable loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts that are subject to impairment for significant increase in credit risk. In assessing whether the credit risk on a financial instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition, the Company compares the risk of a default occurring on the financial instrument at the reporting date based on the remaining maturity of the instrument with the risk of a default occurring that was anticipated for the remaining maturity at the current reporting date when the financial instrument was first recognised. In making this assessment, the Company considers both quantitative and qualitative information that is reasonable and supportable, including historical experience and forward-looking information, that is available without undue cost or effort, based on the Companyâs historical experience and expert credit assessment. Given that a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition is a relative measure, a given change, in absolute terms, in the probability of default (PD) will be more significant for a financial instrument with a lower initial PD than compared to a financial instrument with a higher PD. Modification and Derecognition of Financial AssetsA modification of a financial asset occurs when the contractual terms, governing the cash flows of a financial asset, are renegotiated or otherwise modified between initial recognition and maturity of the financial asset. A modification affects the amount and/or timing of the contractual cash flows, either immediately or at a future date. In addition, the introduction or adjustment of existing covenants of an existing loan may constitute a modification even if these new or adjusted covenants do not yet affect the cash flows immediately but may affect the cash flows depending on whether the covenant is or is not met (e.g., a change to the increase in the interest rate that arises when covenants are breached). The Company renegotiates loans to customers in financial difficulty to maximise collection and minimise the risk of default. A loan forbearance is granted in cases where, although, the borrower made all reasonable efforts to pay under the original contractual terms, there is a high risk of default or default has already happened, and the borrower is expected to be able to meet the revised terms. The revised terms, in most of the cases, include an extension of the maturity of the loan, changes to the timing of the cash flows of the loan (principal and interest repayment), reduction in the amount of cash flows due (principal and interest forgiveness) and amendments to covenants. When a financial asset is modified, the Company assesses whether this modification results in derecognition. In accordance with the Companyâs policy, a modification results in derecognition when it gives rise to substantially different terms. To determine if the modified terms are substantially different from the original contractual terms, the Company considers the following: ⢠Qualitative factors, such as contractual cash flows after modification, are no longer SPPI, ⢠change in currency or change of counterparty, and ⢠the extent of change in interest rates, maturity, covenants. If these do not clearly indicate a substantial modification, then A. In the case where the financial asset is derecognised, the loss allowance for ECL is remeasured at the date of derecognition to determine the net carrying amount of the asset at that date. The difference between this revised carrying amount and the fair value of the new financial asset with the new terms will lead to a gain or loss on derecognition. The new financial asset will have a loss allowance measured based on 12-month ECL, except in the rare occasions where the new loan is considered to be originated credit-impaired. This applies only in the case where the fair value of the new loan is recognised at a significant discount to its revised par amount, because there remains a high risk of default, which has not been reduced by the modification. The Company monitors credit risk of modified financial assets by evaluating qualitative and quantitative information, such as if the borrower is in the past due status under the new terms. B. When the contractual terms of a financial asset are modified and the modification does not result in derecognition, the Company determines if the financial assetâs credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition by comparing: ⢠the remaining lifetime PD estimated based on the data at initial recognition and the original contractual terms; with ⢠the remaining lifetime PD at the reporting date based on the modified terms. For financial assets modified, where modification did not result in derecognition, the estimate of PD reflects the Companyâs ability to collect the modified cash flows taking into account the Companyâs previous experience of similar forbearance action, as well as various behavioural indicators, including the borrowerâs payment performance against the modified contractual terms. If the credit risk remains significantly higher than what was expected at initial recognition, the loss allowance will continue to be measured at an amount equal to lifetime ECL. The loss allowance on forborne loans will generally only be measured based on 12-month ECL, when there is evidence of the borrowerâs improved repayment behaviour following modification leading to a reversal of the previous significant increase in credit risk. Where a modification does not lead to derecognition, the Company calculates the modification gain/loss comparing the gross carrying amount before and after the modification (excluding the ECL allowance). Then the Company measures ECL for the modified asset, where the expected cash flows, arising from the modified financial asset, are included in calculating the expected cash shortfalls from the original asset. The Company derecognises a financial asset only when the contractual rights to the assetâs cash flows expire (including expiry arising from a modification with substantially different terms), or when the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset are transferred to another entity. If the Company neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and continues to control the transferred asset, the Company recognises its retained interest in the asset and an associated liability for amounts it may have to pay. If the Company retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a transferred financial asset, the Company continues to recognise the financial asset, and also recognises a collateralised borrowing for the proceeds received. On derecognition of a financial asset in its entirety, the difference between the assetâs carrying amount and the sum of the consideration received and receivable, and the cumulative gain/loss that had been, recognised in OCI and accumulated in equity is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, with the exception of equity investment designated as measured at FVTOCI, where the cumulative gain/loss previously recognised in OCI is not subsequently reclassified to the Statement of Profit and Loss. On derecognition of a financial asset other than in its entirety (e.g., when the Company retains an option to repurchase part of a transferred asset), the Company allocates the previous carrying amount of the financial asset between the part it continues to recognise under continuing involvement and the part it no longer recognises on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts on the date of the transfer. The difference between the carrying amount allocated to the part, that is no longer recognised, and the sum of the consideration received for the part no longer recognised, and any cumulative gain/loss allocated to it, that had been recognised in OCI, is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. A cumulative gain/loss that had been recognised in OCI is allocated between the part that continues to be recognised and the part that is no longer recognised on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts. This does not apply for equity investments designated as measured at FVTOCI, as the cumulative gain/loss previously recognised in OCI is not subsequently reclassified to the Statement of Profit and Loss. Write OffLoans and debt securities are written off when the Company has no reasonable expectations of recovering the financial asset (either in its entirety or a portion of it). This is the case when the Company determines that the borrower does not have assets or sources of income that could generate sufficient cash flows to repay the amounts, subject to the write-off. A write-off constitutes a derecognition event. The Company may apply enforcement activities to the financial assets written off. Recoveries resulting from the Companyâs enforcement activities will result in impairment gains. Presentation of Allowance for ECL in the Balance SheetLoss allowances for ECL are presented in the Balance Sheet as follows: ⢠for financial assets measured at amortised cost: as a deduction from the gross carrying amount of the assets; and ⢠for debt instruments measured at FVTOCI: no loss allowance is recognised in the Balance Sheet as the carrying amount is at fair value. Where a financial instrument includes both a drawn and an undrawn component, and the Company cannot identify the ECL on the loan commitment component separately from those on the drawn component, the Company presents a combined loss allowance for both components. The combined amount is presented as a deduction from the gross carrying amount of the drawn component. Derecognition of Financial AssetsThe Company derecognises a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or when it transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset to another party. If the Company neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and continues to control the transferred asset, the Company recognises its retained interest in the asset and an associated liability for amounts it may have to pay. If the Company retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a transferred financial asset, the Company continues to recognise the financial asset and also recognises an associated liability. On derecognition of a financial asset in its entirety, the difference between the assetâs carrying amount and the sum of the consideration received and receivable, and the cumulative gain or loss that had been recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, if such gain or loss would have otherwise been recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on disposal of that financial assets. On derecognition of a financial asset other than in its entirety (e.g., when the Company retains an option to repurchase part of a transferred asset), the Company allocates the previous carrying amount of the financial assets between the part it continues to recognise under continuing involvement, and the part is no longer recognises on the basis of relative fair values of those parts on the date of transfer. The difference between the carrying amount allocated to the part that is no longer recognised and the sum of consideration received for the part no longer recognised and any cumulative gain or loss allocated to it that had been recognised in other comprehensive income is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, if such gain/loss would have otherwise been recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on disposal in the Statement of Profit and Loss, if such gain/loss would have otherwise been recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on disposal of that financial asset. A cumulative gain or loss that had been recognised in other comprehensive income is allocated between the part that continues to be recognised and the part that is no longer recognised on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts. Financial Liabilities and Equity Instruments Classification as Debt or Equity Debt and equity instruments, issued by the Company, are classified as either financial liabilities or as equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangements and the definitions of a financial liability and an equity instrument. Equity InstrumentsAn equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Company after deducting all of its liabilities. Equity instruments issued by the Company are recognised at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs. Financial LiabilitiesFinancial liabilities are classified, at initial recognition: ⢠At fair value through profit or loss, ⢠Loans and borrowings, ⢠Payables, or ⢠As derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge, as appropriate. All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value and in the case of loans and borrowings, and payables are recognised net of directly attributable transaction costs. The Companyâs financial liabilities include trade and other payables, loans and borrowings, including bank overdrafts, financial guarantee contracts and derivative financial instruments. Subsequent MeasurementsThe measurement of financial liabilities depends on its classification, as described below: Financial Liabilities at FVTPLFinancial liabilities at FVTPL include financial liabilities held for trading and financial liabilities designated upon initial recognition as at FVTPL. Financial liabilities are classified as held for trading, if they are incurred for the purpose of repurchasing in the near term. This category also includes derivative financial instruments entered into by the Company, that are not designated as hedging instruments in hedge relationships as defined by Ind AS 109. Separated embedded derivatives are also classified as held for trading, unless they are designated as effective hedging instruments. Gains or losses on liabilities held for trading are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Financial liabilities, designated upon initial recognition at FVTPL, are designated as such at the initial date of recognition, and only if the criteria in Ind AS 109 are satisfied. Loans and BorrowingsAfter initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the Effective Interest Rate (EIR) method. Gains and losses are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss when the liabilities are derecognised, as well as through the EIR amortisation process. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation is included as finance costs in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Derecognition of Financial LiabilitiesThe Company derecognises financial liabilities when, and only when, the Company''s obligations are discharged, cancelled or have expired. The difference between the carrying amount of the financial liability derecognised and the consideration paid and payable is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Offsetting of Financial InstrumentsFinancial assets and financial liabilities are offset, and the net amount is reported in the Balance Sheet, if there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, to realise the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously. The Company measures financial instruments, such as investments (other than equity investments in Subsidiaries, Joint Ventures and Associates) and derivatives at fair values at each Balance Sheet date. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement is based on the presumption that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either: a) In the principal market for the asset or liability, or b) I n the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The principal or the most advantageous market must be accessible by the Company. The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest. A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participantâs ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use. The Company uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs. All assets and liabilities (for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial statements) are categorised within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole: Level 1 - Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 - Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input, that is significant to the fair value measurement, is directly or indirectly observable. Level 3 - Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input, that is significant to the fair value measurement, is unobservable. For assets and liabilities that are recognised in the financial statements on a recurring basis, the Company determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by re-assessing categorisation (based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole) at the end of each reporting period. The Management determines the policies and procedures for both recurring fair value measurement, such as derivative instruments and unquoted financial assets measured at fair value, and for non-recurring measurement, such as assets held for disposal in discontinued operations. At each reporting date, the Management analyses the movements in the values of assets and liabilities, which are required to be remeasured or re-assessed as per the Companyâs accounting policies. For this analysis, the Management verifies the major inputs applied in the latest valuation by agreeing the information in the valuation computation to contracts and other relevant documents. Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand and cash at bank, including fixed deposit with original maturity period of three months or less and short-term highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less, which are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value. I nvestment property are properties held to earn rentals and/or for capital appreciation (including property under construction for such purposes). Investment properties are measured initially at cost, including transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, investment properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any. The cost includes the cost of replacing parts and borrowing costs for long-term construction projects, if the recognition criteria are met. When significant parts of the investment property are required to be replaced at intervals, the Company depreciates them separately based on their specific useful lives. All other repair and maintenance costs are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss as incurred. The Company, based on technical assessment made by the Management, depreciates the building over estimated useful lives of 60 years. The Management believes that these estimated useful lives are realistic and reflect fair approximation of the period over which the assets are likely to be used.
Though the Company measures investment property, using cost-based measurement, the fair value of investment property is disclosed in Note No. 54. Fair values are determined based on an annual evaluation performed by an accredited external independent valuer. 2.7 Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) and Depreciation On transition to Ind AS, the Company has elected to continue with the carrying value of all its PPE recognised as at 1st April 2017, measured as per the previous GAAP, and use that carrying value as the deemed cost of the PPE. PPE are stated at acquisition or construction cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment loss. Cost comprises the purchase price and any attributable cost of bringing the asset to its location and working condition for its intended use, including relevant borrowing costs and any expected costs of decommissioning. If significant parts of an item of PPE have different useful lives, then they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of PPE. The cost of an item of PPE is recognised as an asset if, and only if, it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Company in future periods, and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. Expenditure incurred after the PPE have been put into operations, such as repair and maintenance expenses, are charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss, during the period in which they are incurred. Depreciation on PPE is provided on Straight-Line Method using the rates arrived at based on the useful lives as specified in the Schedule II of the Companies Act, 2013, or estimated by the Management. The Company has used the following useful life to provide depreciation on its PPE.
Useful life of assets different from the corresponding life specified in Schedule II has been estimated by the Management supported by technical assessments. The estimated useful lives and residual values of the PPE are reviewed at the end of each financial year. PPE, individually costing less than Rupees five thousand, are fully depreciated in the year of purchase. Depreciation on the PPE added/disposed off/discarded during the year is provided from/up to the date when added/disposed off/discarded. Gains or losses arising from the retirement or disposal of PPE are determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and recognised as income or expense in the Statement of Profit and Loss. 2.8 Intangible Assets and Amortisation On transition to Ind AS, the Company has elected to continue with the carrying value of all its Intangible Assets recognised as at 1st April 2017, measured as per the previous GAAP and use that carrying value as the deemed cost of the intangible assets. I ntangible assets acquired separately are measured on initial recognition at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is their fair value at the date of acquisition. Following initial recognition, intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses, if any. I ntangible assets with finite lives are amortised over the useful economic life and assessed for impairment, whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The amortisation period and the amortisation method for an intangible asset with a finite useful life are reviewed at least at the end of each reporting period. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset are considered to modify the amortisation period or method, as appropriate, and are treated as changes in accounting estimates. The amortisation expense on intangible assets with finite lives is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless such expenditure forms part of carrying value of another asset. Intangible assets are amortised on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. I ntangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortised, but are tested for impairment annually, either individually or at the cash-generating unit level. The assessment of indefinite life is reviewed annually to determine whether the indefinite life continues to be supportable. If not, the change in useful life from indefinite to finite is made on a prospective basis. Gains or losses, arising from the retirement or disposal of an intangible asset, are determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset, and recognised as income or expense in the Statement of Profit and Loss.
The estimated useful lives of the intangible assets and the amortisation period are reviewed at the end of each financial year, and the amortisation period is revised to reflect the changed pattern, if any. Research and Development Costs Research costs are expensed as incurred. Development expenditures on an individual project are recognised as an intangible asset when the Company can demonstrate: ⢠The technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset so that the asset will be available for use or sale; ⢠How the asset will generate future economic benefits; ⢠The availability of resources to complete the asset; and ⢠The ability to measure reliably the expenditure during development. Following initial recognition of the development expenditure as an asset, the asset is carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses. Amortisation of the asset begins when development is complete and the asset is available for use. It is amortised over the period of expected future benefits. Amortisation expenses are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless such expenditure forms part of carrying value of another asset. During the period of development, the asset is tested for impairment annually. 2.9 Impairment of Non-Financial Assets At the end of each reporting period, the Company reviews the carrying amounts of non-financial assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). When it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. When a reasonable and consistent basis of allocation can be identified, corporate assets are also allocated to individual cash-generating units, or otherwise they are allocated to the smallest company of cash-generating units for which a reasonable and consistent allocation basis can be identified. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and intangible assets not yet available for use are tested for impairment, at least annually, and whenever there is an indication then the asset may be impaired. Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use. In assessing the value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset, for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted. If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised immediately in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease. When an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or a cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but, so that, the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset (or cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised immediately in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase. The determination of whether an arrangement is (or contains) a lease is based on the substance of the arrangement at the inception of the lease. The arrangement is, or contains, a lease if fulfilment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets, and the arrangement conveys a right-to-use the asset or assets, even if that right is not explicitly specified in an arrangement. The Company as a Lessee Leases, where substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item are transferred to the Lessee, are classified as finance lease. The assets acquired under finance lease are capitalised at lower of fair value, and present value of the minimum lease payments at the inception of the lease and disclosed as leased assets. Such assets are amortised over the period of lease or estimated life of such asset, whichever is less. Lease payments are apportioned between the finance charges and reduction of the lease liability based on implicit rate of return. Lease management fees, lease charges and other initial direct costs are capitalised. The Company as a Lessee The Companyâs lease asset classes primarily consist of leases for land and buildings. The Company assesses whether a contract contains a lease, at inception of a contract. A contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. To assess whether a contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset, the Company assesses whether: (1) the contract involves the use of an identified asset; (2) the Company has substantially all of the economic benefits from use of the asset through the period of the lease; and (3) the Company has the right to direct the use of the asset. At the date of commencement of the lease, the Company recognises right-of-use (âROUâ) asset and a corresponding lease liability for all lease arrangements in which it is a lessee, except for leases with a term of 12 months or less (short-term leases) and low value leases. For these shortterm and low value leases, the Company recognises the lease payments as an operating expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Certain lease arrangements include the options to extend or terminate the lease before the end of the lease term. ROU assets and lease liabilities include these options when it is reasonably certain that they will be exercised. Right-of-use assets are initially recognised at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for any lease payments made at or prior to the commencement date of the lease plus any initial direct costs less any lease incentives. They are subsequently measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Right-of-use assets are depreciated from the commencement date on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term and useful life of the underlying asset. Right-of-use assets are evaluated for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. For the purpose of impairment testing, the recoverable amount (i.e., the higher of the fair value less cost to sell and the value-in-use) is determined on an individual asset basis, unless the asset generates cash flows that are largely dependent of those from other assets. In such cases, the recoverable amount is determined for the CashGenerating Unit (CGU) to which the asset belongs. Lease liability is initially measured at amortised cost at the present value of the future lease payments. The lease payments are discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if not readily determinable, using the incremental borrowing rates in the country of domicile of the leases. Lease liabilities are remeasured with a corresponding adjustment to the related right-of-use asset, if the Company changes its assessment on exercise of an extension or a termination option. Lease liability and ROU asset have been separately presented in the Balance Sheet, and lease payments have been classified as financing cash flows. The Company as a LessorLeases, for which the Company is a lessor, are classified as a finance or operating lease. Whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee, the contract is classified as a finance lease. All other leases are classified as operating leases. When the Company is an intermediate lessor, it accounts for its interests in the head lease and the sub-lease separately. The sub-lease is classified as a finance or operating lease by reference to the right-of-use asset arising from the head lease. For operating leases, rental income is recognised on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant lease. 2.11 Employee BenefitsShort-Term Employee Benefits Liabilities for salaries, including non-monetary benefits and accumulating leave balance in respect of employeesâ services up to the end of the reporting period, are recognised as liabilities (and expensed), and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. The Company also recognises a liability and records an expense for bonuses (including performance-linked bonuses) where contractually obliged or where there is a past practice that has created a constructive obligation. Provident Fund: The Company makes defined contributions to employee provident fund and employee pension schemes administered by government organisations, set up under the applicable statute. Superannuation Fund: Superannuation schemes administered by a trust set up by Grasim Industries Limited (âthe Holding Companyâ). Defined Benefits Plans (Gratuity Obligation) The obligation in respect of defined benefits plans, which covers Gratuity, which is provided for on the basis of an actuarial valuation at the end of each financial year. Gratuity is funded with an approved trust. I n respect of Gratuity being post-retirement benefits, remeasurements, comprising actuarial gains and losses, the effect of changes to the asset ceiling (if applicable), and the return on plan assets (excluding net interest) is reflected immediately in the Balance Sheet with a charge or credit recognised in other comprehensive income in the period in which they occur. Remeasurement recognised in other comprehensive income is reflected immediately in retained earnings, and will not be reclassified to the Statement of Profit and Loss. Past service costs are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on the earlier of: ⢠the date of the plan amendment or curtailment, and ⢠the date that the Company recognises related restricting costs. The Company recognises the following changes in the net defined benefits obligation under employee benefits expenses in the Statement of Profit and Loss: ⢠service cost (including current service cost, past service cost, as well as gains and losses on curtailments and settlements); and ⢠net interest expense or income. The Company presents the above two components of defined benefit costs in the Statement of Profit and Loss in the line item âEmployee Benefits Expensesâ. The present value of the defined benefits plans liability is calculated using a discount rate, which is determined by reference to market yields at the end of the reporting period on government bonds. The retirement benefits obligation recognised in the Balance Sheet represents the actual deficit or surplus in the Companyâs defined benefits plans. Any surplus resulting from this calculation is limited to the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plans or reductions in the future contribution to the plans. The expected costs of other long-term employee benefits, such as long-term service incentive plan benefits (not being share-based payments), are accrued over the period of employment using the same accounting methodology as used for defined benefits plans. Remeasurement gains and losses, arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions, are charged or credited to the Statement of Profit and Loss in the period in which they arise. 2.12 Employee Share-Based Payments Equity-Settled Transactions Equity-settled share-based payments to employees are measured by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the grant date using Black-Scholes Model. The fair value, determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments, is charged to profit and loss on the straight-line basis over the vesting period of the option, based on the Company''s estimate of equity instruments that will eventually vest, with a corresponding increase in equity. I n case of forfeiture/lapse stock option, which is not vested, amortised portion is reversed by credit to employee compensation expense. In situation where the stock o
Mar 31, 2022
1. GENERAL INFORMATION AND BASIS OF PREPARATION Aditya Birla Capital Limited (âthe Companyâ) is a listed public company having its registered office at Indian Rayon Compound, Veraval - 362 266, Gujarat. The Company currently operates as a Non-Deposit Taking Core Investment Company registered with the RBI vide certificate no. B.01.00555, dated 16th October 2015. The Company is a majority owned subsidiary of Grasim Industries Limited. Information on other related party relationship of the Company is provided in Note No. 37. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Indian Accounting Standards (âInd ASâ) notified under Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 (âthe Actâ), read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended from time to time. The financial statements are authorised for issue by the Board of Directors of the Company at its meeting held on 12th May 2022. The financial statements have been prepared and presented on the going concern basis, the relevant provisions of the act and the guidelines and directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to the extent applicable. The financial statements have been prepared at historical cost, except for the following assets and liabilities, which have been subsequently measured at fair value: ⢠Derivative Financial Instruments measured at fair value. ⢠Certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. ⢠Employeeâs Defined Benefits Plans as per actuarial valuation. To provide more reliable and relevant information about the effect of certain items in the Standalone Balance Sheet and the Standalone Statement of Profit and Loss, the Company has changed the classification of certain items. Previous period/year figures have been re-grouped or reclassified, to confirm to such current period grouping/classifications. There is no impact on Equity or Net Loss due to these regrouping/ reclassifications. 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES2.1 Presentation of Financial Statements The Company presents its financial statements to comply with Division III of Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013, which provides general instructions for the preparation of financial statements of a non-banking financial company (NBFC to comply with Ind AS) and the requirements of Ind AS. An analysis regarding recovery or settlement within 12 months after the reporting date (current) and more than 12 months after the reporting date (non-current) is presented in Note No. 42. Financial assets and financial liabilities are generally reported gross in the Balance Sheet. They are only offset and reported net when, in addition to having an unconditional legally enforceable right to offset the recognised amounts without being contingent on a future event, the parties also intend to settle on a net basis in all of the following circumstances: ⢠The normal course of business, and ⢠The event of default. 2.2 Functional and Presentation Currency Amounts in the financial statements are presented in Indian Rupees in Crore rounded off to two decimal places as permitted by Division III of Schedule III of the Act, except when otherwise indicated. A financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity, and a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity. Financial Assetsinitial Recognition and Measurement All financial assets are recognised initially at fair value. However, in the case of financial assets not recorded at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs, that are attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset, are added to the fair value. Purchases or sales of financial assets that require delivery of assets within a time frame established by regulation or convention in the marketplace (regular way trades), are recognised on the trade date, i.e., the date that the Company commits to purchase or sell the asset. Subsequent MeasurementFor the purposes of subsequent measurement, financial assets are classified in four categories: > Debt instruments at amortised cost, > Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI), > Debt instruments, derivatives and equity instruments, and mutual funds at fair value, through profit or loss (FVTPL), and > Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI). Debt Instruments at Amortised CostA âdebt instrumentâ is measured at the amortised cost, if both the following conditions are met: a) The asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets for collecting contractual cash flows, and b) Contractual terms of the asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are Solely Payments of Principal and Interest (SPPI) on the principal amount outstanding. After initial measurement, such financial assets are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate (EIR) method. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation is included in finance income in the Statement of Profit and Loss. The losses arising from impairment are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Debt Instruments at FVTOCIA âdebt instrumentâ is classified as at the FVTOCI, if both of the following criteria are met: a) The objective of the business model is achieved, both by collecting contractual cash flows and selling the financial assets, and b) The assetâs contractual cash flows represent Solely Payments of Principal and Interest (SPPI). Debt instruments, included within the FVTOCI category, are measured initially, as well as at each reporting date at fair value. Fair value movements are recognised in the other comprehensive income (OCI). However, the Company recognises interest income, impairment losses and reversals, and foreign exchange gain or loss in the Statement of Profit and Loss. On derecognition of the asset, cumulative gain or loss, previously recognised in OCI, is reclassified from the equity to the Statement of Profit and Loss. Interest earned whilst holding FVTOCI debt instrument is reported as interest income using the EIR method. Debt Instruments at FVTPLFVTPL is a residual category for debt instruments. Any debt instrument, which does not meet the criteria for categorisation as at amortised cost or as FVTOCI, is classified as at FVTPL. In addition, the Company may elect to designate a debt instrument, which otherwise meets amortised cost or FVTOCI criteria, as at FVTPL. However, such election is allowed only if doing so reduces or eliminates a measurement or recognition inconsistency (referred to as âaccounting mismatchâ). Debt instruments included within the FVTPL category are measured at fair value with all changes recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Equity InvestmentsInvestments in Subsidiaries, Associates and Joint Ventures are out of scope of Ind AS 109, and, hence, the Company has accounted for its investments in Subsidiaries, Associates and Joint Ventures at cost. All other equity investments are measured at fair value. Equity instruments, which are held for trading, are classified as at FVTPL. For equity instruments, other than held for trading, the Company has irrevocable option to present in OCI, subsequent changes in the fair value. The Company makes such election on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The classification is made on initial recognition and is irrevocable. Where the Company classifies equity instruments as at FVTOCI, then all fair value changes on the instrument, excluding dividends, are recognised in the OCI. There is no recycling of the amounts from OCI to the Statement of Profit and Loss, even on sale of investment. Equity instruments, included within the FVTPL category, are measured at fair value with all changes recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Impairment of Financial Assets The Company recognises loss allowances for ECLs on the following financial instruments that are not measured at FVTPL: ⢠Loans and advances to customers; ⢠Debt investment securities; ⢠Trade and other receivables; ⢠Lease receivables; ⢠Irrevocable loan commitments issued; and ⢠Financial guarantee contracts issued; With the exception of Purchased or Originated Credit-Impaired (POCI) financial assets (which are considered separately below), ECLs are required to be measured through a loss allowance at an amount equal to: ⢠12-month ECL, i.e., that result from those default events on the financial instrument that are possible within 12 months after the reporting date (referred to as Stage 1); or ⢠Full lifetime ECL, i.e., lifetime ECL that results from all possible default events over the life of the financial instrument (referred to as Stage 2 and Stage 3). A loss allowance for full lifetime ECL is required for a financial instrument, if the credit risk on that financial instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition (and consequently for credit impaired financial assets). For all other financial instruments, ECLs are measured at an amount equal to the 12-month ECL. The Companyâs policy is always to measure loss allowances for lease receivables as lifetime ECL. ECLs are a probability-weighted estimate of the present value of credit losses. These are measured as the present value of the difference between the cash flows due to the Company under the contract and the cash flows that the Company expects to receive arising from the weighting of multiple future economic scenarios, discounted at the assetâs EIR. ⢠For undrawn loan commitments, the ECL is the difference between the present value of the difference between the contractual cash flows that are due to the Company, if the holder of the commitment draws down the loan, and the cash flows that the Company expects to receive, if the loan is drawn down; and ⢠For financial guarantee contracts, the ECL is the difference between the expected payments to reimburse the holder of the guaranteed debt instrument less any amounts that the Company expects to receive from the holder, the debtor or any other party. The Company measures ECL on an individual basis, or on a collective basis for portfolios of loans that share similar economic risk characteristics. The measurement of the loss allowance is based on the present value of the assetâs expected cash flows using the assetâs original EIR, regardless of whether it is measured on an individual basis or a collective basis. Credit-impaired Financial AssetsA financial asset is âcredit-impairedâ when one or more events, that have a detrimental impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset, have occurred. Credit-impaired financial assets are referred to as Stage 3 assets. Evidence of credit-impairment includes observable data about the following events: ⢠significant financial difficulty of the borrower or issuer; ⢠a breach of contract such as a default or past due event; ⢠the lender of the borrower, for economic or contractual reasons relating to the borrowerâs financial difficulty, having granted to the borrower a concession that the lender would not otherwise consider; ⢠the disappearance of an active market for a security because of financial difficulties; or ⢠the purchase of a financial asset at a deep discount that reflects the incurred credit losses; It may not be possible to identify a single discrete event, instead, the combined effect of several events may have caused financial assets to become credit-impaired. The Company assesses whether debt instruments that are financial assets measured at amortised cost or FVTOCI are credit-impaired at each reporting date. To assess if corporate debt instruments are credit impaired, the Company considers factors such as bond yields, credit ratings and the ability of the borrower to raise funding. A loan is considered credit-impaired when a concession is granted to the borrower due to a deterioration in the borrowerâs financial condition, unless there is evidence that, as a result of granting the concession, the risk of not receiving the contractual cash flows has reduced significantly, and there are no other indicators of impairment. For financial assets, where concessions are contemplated but not granted, the asset is deemed credit-impaired when there is observable evidence of credit-impairment, including meeting the definition of default. The definition of default (see below) includes unlikeliness to pay indicators and a back-stop, if amounts are overdue for 90 days or more. Purchased or Originated Credit-impaired (POCi) Financial AssetsPOCI financial assets are treated differently because the asset is credit-impaired at initial recognition. For these assets, the Company recognises all changes in lifetime ECL since initial recognition as a loss allowance with any changes recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. A favourable change for such assets creates an impairment gain. Definition of DefaultCritical to the determination of ECL is the definition of default. The definition of default is used in measuring the amount of ECL and in the determination of whether the loss allowance is based on 12-month or lifetime ECL, as default is a component of the probability of default (PD), which affects both the measurement of ECLs and the identification of a significant increase in credit risk. The Company considers the following as constituting an event of default: ⢠the borrower is past due more than 90 days on any material credit obligation to the Company; or ⢠the borrower is unlikely to pay its credit obligations to the Company in full. The definition of default is appropriately tailored to reflect different characteristics of different types of assets. When assessing, if the borrower is unlikely to pay its credit obligation, the Company takes into account both qualitative and quantitative indicators. The information assessed depends on the type of the asset, e.g., in corporate lending a qualitative indicator used is the admittance of bankruptcy petition by National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), which is not relevant for retail lending. Quantitative indicators, such as overdue status and non-payment on another obligation of the same counterparty, are key inputs in this analysis. The Company uses a variety of sources of information to assess default, which are either developed internally or obtained from external sources. The definition of default is applied consistently to all financial instruments, unless information becomes available that demonstrates that another default definition is more appropriate for a particular financial instrument. Significant Increase in Credit RiskThe Company monitors all financial assets, issued irrevocable loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts that are subject to the impairment requirements to assess whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk, since initial recognition. If there has been a significant increase in credit risk, the Company will measure the loss allowance based on lifetime rather than 12-month ECL. The Companyâs accounting policy is not to use the practical expedient that the financial assets with âlowâ credit risk at the reporting date are deemed not to have had a significant increase in credit risk. As a result, the Company monitors all financial assets, issued irrevocable loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts that are subject to impairment for significant increase in credit risk. In assessing whether the credit risk on a financial instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition, the Company compares the risk of a default occurring on the financial instrument at the reporting date based on the remaining maturity of the instrument with the risk of a default occurring that was anticipated for the remaining maturity at the current reporting date when the financial instrument was first recognised. In making this assessment, the Company considers both quantitative and qualitative information that is reasonable and supportable, including historical experience and forward-looking information, that is available without undue cost or effort, based on the Companyâs historical experience and expert credit assessment. Given that a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition is a relative measure, a given change, in absolute terms, in the probability of default (PD) will be more significant for a financial instrument with a lower initial PD than compared to a financial instrument with a higher PD. Modification and Derecognition of Financial AssetsA modification of a financial asset occurs when the contractual terms, governing the cash flows of a financial asset, are renegotiated or otherwise modified between initial recognition and maturity of the financial asset. A modification affects the amount and/or timing of the contractual cash flows, either immediately or at a future date. In addition, the introduction or adjustment of existing covenants of an existing loan may constitute a modification even if these new or adjusted covenants do not yet affect the cash flows immediately, but may affect the cash flows depending on whether the covenant is or is not met (e.g., a change to the increase in the interest rate that arises when covenants are breached). The Company renegotiates loans to customers in financial difficulty to maximise collection and minimise the risk of default. A loan forbearance is granted in cases where, although, the borrower made all reasonable efforts to pay under the original contractual terms, there is a high risk of default or default has already happened and the borrower is expected to be able to meet the revised terms. The revised terms, in most of the cases, include an extension of the maturity of the loan, changes to the timing of the cash flows of the loan (principal and interest repayment), reduction in the amount of cash flows due (principal and interest forgiveness) and amendments to covenants. When a financial asset is modified the Company assesses whether this modification results in derecognition. In accordance with the Companyâs policy a modification results in derecognition when it gives rise to substantially different terms. To determine if the modified terms are substantially different from the original contractual terms, the Company considers the following: ⢠Qualitative factors, such as contractual cash flows after modification, are no longer SPPI, ⢠Change in currency or change of counterparty, and ⢠The extent of change in interest rates, maturity, covenants. If these do not clearly indicate a substantial modification, then; A. In the case where the financial asset is derecognised, the loss allowance for ECL is remeasured at the date of derecognition to determine the net carrying amount of the asset at that date. The difference between this revised carrying amount and the fair value of the new financial asset with the new terms will lead to a gain or loss on derecognition. The new financial asset will have a loss allowance measured based on 12-month ECL, except in the rare occasions where the new loan is considered to be originated credit-impaired. This applies only in the case where the fair value of the new loan is recognised at a significant discount to its revised par amount, because there remains a high risk of default, which has not been reduced by the modification. The Company monitors credit risk of modified financial assets by evaluating qualitative and quantitative information, such as if the borrower is in the past due status under the new terms. B. When the contractual terms of a financial asset are modified and the modification does not result in derecognition, the Company determines if the financial assetâs credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition by comparing: ⢠the remaining lifetime PD estimated based on the data at initial recognition and the original contractual terms; with ⢠the remaining lifetime PD at the reporting date based on the modified terms. For financial assets modified, where modification did not result in derecognition, the estimate of PD reflects the Companyâs ability to collect the modified cash flows taking into account the Companyâs previous experience of similar forbearance action, as well as various behavioural indicators, including the borrowerâs payment performance against the modified contractual terms. If the credit risk remains significantly higher than what was expected at initial recognition the loss allowance will continue to be measured at an amount equal to lifetime ECL. The loss allowance on forborne loans will generally only be measured based on 12-month ECL, when there is evidence of the borrowerâs improved repayment behaviour following modification leading to a reversal of the previous significant increase in credit risk. Where a modification does not lead to derecognition, the Company calculates the modification gain/loss comparing the gross carrying amount before and after the modification (excluding the ECL allowance). Then the Company measures ECL for the modified asset, where the expected cash flows, arising from the modified financial asset, are included in calculating the expected cash shortfalls from the original asset. The Company derecognises a financial asset only when the contractual rights to the assetâs cash flows expire (including expiry arising from a modification with substantially different terms), or when the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset are transferred to another entity. If the Company neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and continues to control the transferred asset, the Company recognises its retained interest in the asset and an associated liability for amounts it may have to pay. If the Company retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a transferred financial asset, the Company continues to recognise the financial asset and also recognises a collateralised borrowing for the proceeds received. On derecognition of a financial asset in its entirety, the difference between the assetâs carrying amount and the sum of the consideration received and receivable, and the cumulative gain/loss that had been recognised in OCI and accumulated in equity is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, with the exception of equity investment designated as measured at FVTOCI, where the cumulative gain/loss previously recognised in OCI is not subsequently reclassified to the Statement of Profit and Loss. On derecognition of a financial asset other than in its entirety (e.g., when the Company retains an option to repurchase part of a transferred asset), the Company allocates the previous carrying amount of the financial asset between the part it continues to recognise under continuing involvement and the part it no longer recognises on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts on the date of the transfer. The difference between the carrying amount allocated to the part, that is no longer recognised, and the sum of the consideration received for the part no longer recognised, and any cumulative gain/loss allocated to it, that had been recognised in OCI, is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. A cumulative gain/loss that had been recognised in OCI is allocated between the part that continues to be recognised and the part that is no longer recognised on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts. This does not apply for equity investments designated as measured at FVTOCI, as the cumulative gain/loss previously recognised in OCI is not subsequently reclassified to the Statement of Profit and Loss. Write OffLoans and debt securities are written off when the Company has no reasonable expectations of recovering the financial asset (either in its entirety or a portion of it). This is the case when the Company determines that the borrower does not have assets or sources of income that could generate sufficient cash flows to repay the amounts, subject to the write-off. A write-off constitutes a derecognition event. The Company may apply enforcement activities to the financial assets written off. Recoveries resulting from the Companyâs enforcement activities will result in impairment gains. Presentation of Allowance for ECL in the Statement of Balance SheetLoss allowances for ECL are presented in the Statement of Balance Sheet as follows: ⢠for financial assets measured at amortised cost: as a deduction from the gross carrying amount of the assets; and ⢠for debt instruments measured at FVTOCI: no loss allowance is recognised in the Balance Sheet as the carrying amount is at fair value. Where a financial instrument includes both a drawn and an undrawn component, and the Company cannot identify the ECL on the loan commitment component separately from those on the drawn component, the Company presents a combined loss allowance for both components. The combined amount is presented as a deduction from the gross carrying amount of the drawn component. Derecognition of Financial AssetsThe Company derecognises a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or when it transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset to another party. If the Company neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and continues to control the transferred asset, the Company recognises its retained interest in the asset and an associated liability for amounts it may have to pay. If the Company retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a transferred financial asset, the Company continues to recognise the financial asset and also recognises an associated liability. On derecognition of a financial asset in its entirety, the difference between the assetâs carrying amount and the sum of the consideration received and receivable, and the cumulative gain or loss that had been recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, if such gain or loss would have otherwise been recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on disposal of that financial assets. On derecognition of a financial asset other than in its entirety (e.g., when the Company retains an option to repurchase part of a transferred asset), the Company allocates the previous carrying amount of the financial assets between the part it continues to recognise under continuing involvement, and the part is no longer recognises on the basis of relative fair values of those parts on the date of transfer. The difference between the carrying amount allocated to the part that is no longer recognised and the sum of consideration received for the part no longer recognised and any cumulative gain or loss allocated to it that had been recognised in other comprehensive income is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, if such gain/loss would have otherwise been recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on disposal in the Statement of Profit and Loss, if such gain/loss would have otherwise been recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on disposal of that financial asset. A cumulative gain or loss that had been recognised in other comprehensive income is allocated between the part that continues to be recognised and the part that is no longer recognised on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts. Financial Liabilities and Equity InstrumentsClassification as Debt or Equity Debt and equity instruments, issued by the Company, are classified as either financial liabilities or as equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangements and the definitions of a financial liability and an equity instrument. Equity Instruments An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Company after deducting all of its liabilities. Equity instruments issued by the Company are recognised at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs. Financial LiabilitiesFinancial liabilities are classified, at initial recognition: ⢠At fair value through profit or loss, ⢠Loans and borrowings, ⢠Payables, or ⢠As derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge, as appropriate. All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair values, and in the case of loans and borrowings, and payables are recognised net of directly attributable transaction costs. The Companyâs financial liabilities include trade and other payables, loans and borrowings, including bank overdrafts, financial guarantee contracts and derivative financial instruments. Subsequent MeasurementsThe measurement of financial liabilities depends on its classification, as described below: Financial Liabilities at FVTPLFinancial liabilities at FVTPL include financial liabilities held for trading and financial liabilities designated upon initial recognition as at FVTPL. Financial liabilities are classified as held for trading, if they are incurred for the purpose of repurchasing in the near term. This category also includes derivative financial instruments entered by the Company, that are not designated as hedging instruments in hedge relationships as defined by Ind AS 109. Separated embedded derivatives are also classified as held for trading unless they are designated as effective hedging instruments. Gains or losses on liabilities held for trading are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Financial liabilities, designated upon initial recognition at FVTPL, are designated as such at the initial date of recognition, and only if the criteria in Ind AS 109 are satisfied. Loans and BorrowingsAfter initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the Effective Interest Rate (EIR) method. Gains and losses are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss when the liabilities are derecognised, as well as through the EIR amortisation process. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation is included as finance costs in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Derecognition of Financial Liabilities The Company derecognises financial liabilities when, and only when, the Companyâs obligations are discharged, cancelled or have expired. The difference between the carrying amount of the financial liability derecognised and the consideration paid and payable is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Offsetting of Financial InstrumentsFinancial assets and financial liabilities are offset, and the net amount is reported in the Balance Sheet, if there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, to realise the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously. The Company measures financial instruments, such as investments (other than equity investments in Subsidiaries, Joint Ventures and Associates) and derivatives at fair values at each Balance Sheet date. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement is based on the presumption that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either: a) In the principal market for the asset or liability, or b) In the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The principal or the most advantageous market must be accessible by the Company. The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest. A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participantâs ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use. The Company uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs. All assets and liabilities (for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial statements) are categorised within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole: Level 1 - Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 - Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is directly or indirectly observable. Level 3 - Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is unobservable. For assets and liabilities that are recognised in the financial statements on a recurring basis, the Company determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by re-assessing categorisation (based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole) at the end of each reporting period. The Management determines the policies and procedures for both recurring fair value measurement, such as derivative instruments and unquoted financial assets measured at fair value, and for non-recurring measurement, such as assets held for disposal in discontinued operations. At each reporting date, the Management analyses the movements in the values of assets and liabilities, which are required to be remeasured or re-assessed as per the Companyâs accounting policies. For this analysis, the Management verifies the major inputs applied in the latest valuation by agreeing the information in the valuation computation to contracts and other relevant documents. 2.5 Cash and Cash EquivalentsCash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand and cash at bank, including fixed deposit with original maturity period of three months or less and short-term highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less, which are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value. 2.6 Investment PropertyInvestment Property are properties held to earn rentals and/or for capital appreciation (including property under construction for such purposes). Investment properties are measured initially at cost, including transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, investment properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any. The cost includes the cost of replacing parts and borrowing costs for long-term construction projects, if the recognition criteria are met. When significant parts of the investment property are required to be replaced at intervals, the Company depreciates them separately based on their specific useful lives. All other repair and maintenance costs are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss as incurred. The Company, based on technical assessment made by the Management, depreciates the building over estimated useful lives of 60 years. The Management believes that these estimated useful lives are realistic and reflect fair approximation of the period over which the assets are likely to be used.
Though the Company measures investment property, using cost-based measurement, the fair value of investment property is disclosed in Note No. 53. Fair values are determined based on an annual evaluation performed by an accredited external independent valuer. 2.7 Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) and DepreciationOn transition to Ind AS, the Company has elected to continue with the carrying value of all its PPE recognised as of 1st April 2017, measured as per the previous GAAP, and use that carrying value as the deemed cost of the PPE. PPE are stated at acquisition or construction cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment loss. Cost comprises the purchase price and any attributable cost of bringing the asset to its location and working condition for its intended use, including relevant borrowing costs and any expected costs of decommissioning. If significant parts of an item of PPE have different useful lives, then they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of PPE. The cost of an item of PPE is recognised as an asset, if, and only if, it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Company in future periods, and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. Expenditure incurred after the PPE have been put into operations, such as repair and maintenance expenses, are charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss, during the period in which they are incurred. Depreciation on PPE is provided on Straight-Line Method using the rates arrived at based on the useful lives as specified in the Schedule II of the Companies Act, 2013, or estimated by the Management. The Company has used the following useful life to provide depreciation on its PPE.
Useful life of assets different from the corresponding life specified in Schedule II has been estimated by the Management supported by technical assessments. The estimated useful lives and residual values of the PPE are reviewed at the end of each financial year. PPE, individually costing less than Rupees five thousand, are fully depreciated in the year of purchase. Depreciation on the PPE added/disposed of/discarded during the year is provided from/up to the date when added/disposed of/discarded. Gains or losses arising from the retirement or disposal of PPE are determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset, and recognised as income or expense in the Statement of Profit and Loss. 2.8 Intangible Assets and AmortisationOn transition to Ind AS, the Company has elected to continue with the carrying value of all its Intangible Assets recognised as of 1st April 2017, measured as per the previous GAAP and use that carrying value as the deemed cost of the intangible assets. Intangible assets acquired separately are measured on initial recognition at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is their fair value at the date of acquisition. Following initial recognition, intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses, if any. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortised over the useful economic life and assessed for impairment, whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The amortisation period and the amortisation method for an intangible asset with a finite useful life are reviewed at least at the end of each reporting period. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset are considered to modify the amortisation period or method, as appropriate, and are treated as changes in accounting estimates. The amortisation expense on intangible assets with finite lives is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless such expenditure forms part of carrying value of another asset. Intangible assets are amortised on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortised, but are tested for impairment annually, either individually or at the cash-generating unit level. The assessment of indefinite life is reviewed annually to determine whether the indefinite life continues to be supportable. If not, the change in useful life from indefinite to finite is made on a prospective basis. Gains or losses, arising from the retirement or disposal of an intangible asset, are determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset, and recognised as income or expense in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Intangible assets and their useful lives are as under:
The estimated useful lives of the intangible assets and the amortisation period are reviewed at the end of each financial year, and the amortisation period is revised to reflect the changed pattern, if any. Research and Development CostsResearch costs are expensed as incurred. Development expenditures on an individual project are recognised as an intangible asset when the Company can demonstrate: > The technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset so that the asset will be available for use or sale; > How the asset will generate future economic benefits; > The availability of resources to complete the asset; and > The ability to measure reliably the expenditure during development. Following initial recognition of the development expenditure as an asset, the asset is carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses. Amortisation of the asset begins when development is complete, and the asset is available for use. It is amortised over the period of expected future benefits. Amortisation expenses are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless such expenditure forms part of carrying value of another asset. During the period of development, the asset is tested for impairment annually. 2.9 Impairment of Non-Financial AssetsAt the end of each reporting period, the Company reviews the carrying amounts of non-financial assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). When it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. When a reasonable and consistent basis of allocation can be identified, corporate assets are also allocated to individual cash-generating units, or otherwise they are allocated to the smallest company of cash-generating units for which a reasonable and consistent allocation basis can be identified. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and intangible assets not yet available for use are tested for impairment, at least annually, and whenever there is an indication then the asset may be impaired. Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use. In assessing the value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset, for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted. If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised immediately in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease. When an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or a cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but, so that, the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset (or cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised immediately in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase. 2.10 LeasesThe determination of whether an arrangement is (or contains) a lease is based on the substance of the arrangement at the inception of the lease. The arrangement is, or contains, a lease if fulfilment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets, and the arrangement conveys a right-to-use the asset or assets, even if that right is not explicitly specified in an arrangement. Finance LeaseThe Company as a Lessee Leases, where substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item are transferred to the Lessee, are classified as finance lease. The assets acquired under finance lease are capitalised at lower of fair value, and present value of the minimum lease payments at the inception of the lease and disclosed as leased assets. Such assets are amortised over the period of lease or estimated life of such asset, whichever is less. Lease payments are apportioned between the finance charges and reduction of the lease liability based on implicit rate of return. Lease management fees, lease charges and other initial direct costs are capitalised. Operating LeaseThe Company as a Lessee The Companyâs lease asset classes primarily consist of leases for land and buildings. The Company assesses whether a contract contains a lease, at inception of a contract. A contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. To assess whether a contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset, the Company assesses whether: (1) the contract involves the use of an identified asset; (2) the Company has substantially all the economic benefits from use of the asset through the period of the lease; and (3) the Company has the right to direct the use of the asset. At the date of commencement of the lease, the Company recognises right-of-use (âROUâ) asset and a corresponding lease liability for all lease arrangements in which it is a lessee, except for leases with a term of 12 months or less (short-term leases) and low value leases. For these shortterm and low value leases, the Company recognises the lease payments as an operating expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Certain lease arrangements include the options to extend or terminate the lease before the end of the lease term. ROU assets and lease liabilities include these options when it is reasonably certain that they will be exercised. Right-of-use assets are initially recognised at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for any lease payments made at or prior to the commencement date of the lease plus any initial direct costs less any lease incentives. They are subsequently measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Right-of-use assets are depreciated from the commencement date on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term and useful life of the under lying asset. Right-of-use assets are evaluated for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. For the purpose of impairment testing, the recoverable amount (i.e., the higher of the fair value less cost to sell and the value-in-use) is determined on an individual asset basis, unless the asset generates cash flows that are largely dependent of those from other assets. In such cases, the recoverable amount is determined for the Cash-Generating Unit (CGU) to which the asset belongs. The lease liability is initially measured at amortised cost at the present value of the future lease payments. The lease payments are discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if not readily determinable, using the incremental borrowing rates in the country of domicile of the leases. Lease liabilities are remeasured with a corresponding adjustment to the related right-of-use asset, if the Company changes its assessment on exercise of an extension or a termination option. Lease liability and ROU asset have been separately presented in the Balance Sheet, and lease payments have been classified as financing cash flows. The Company as a Lessor Leases, for which the Company is a lessor, are classified as a finance or operating lease. Whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee, the contract is classified as a finance lease. All other leases are classified as operating leases. When the Company is an intermediate lessor, it accounts for its interests in the head lease and the sub-lease separately. The sub-lease is classified as a finance or operating lease by reference to the right-of-use asset arising from the head lease. For operating leases, rental income is recognised on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant lease. 2.11 Employee BenefitsShort-Term Employee BenefitsLiabilities for salaries and wages, including non-monetary benefits and accumulating leave balance in respect of employeesâ services up to the end of the reporting period, are recognised as liabilities (and expensed), and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. The Company also recognises a liability and records an expense for bonuses (including performance-linked bonuses) where contractually obliged or where there is a past practice that has created a constructive obligation. Defined Contribution PlansProvident Fund: The Company makes defined contributions to employee provident fund and employee pension schemes administered by government organisations, set up under the applicable statute. Superannuation Fund: Superannuation schemes administered by a trust set up by Grasim Industries Limited (âthe Holding Companyâ). Defined Benefits Plans (Gratuity Obligation)The obligation in respect of defined benefits plans, which covers Gratuity, is provided for on the basis of an actuarial valuation at the end of each financial year. Gratuity is funded with an approved trust. In respect of Gratuity being post-retirement benefits, remeasurements, comprising actuarial gains and losses, the effect of the changes to the asset ceiling (if applicable) and the return on plan assets (excluding net interest), is reflected immediately in the Balance Sheet with a charge or credit recognised in other comprehensive income in the period in which they occur. Remeasurement recognised in other comprehensive income is reflected immediately in retained earnings, and will not be reclassified to the Statement of Profit and Loss. Past service costs are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on the earlier of: ⢠the date of the plan amendment or curtailment, and ⢠the date that the Company recognises related restricting costs. The Company recognises the following changes in the net defined benefit obligation under employee benefit expenses in the Statement of Profit and Loss: ⢠service cost (including current service cost, past service cost, as well as gains and losses on curtailments and settlements); and ⢠net interest expense or income. The Company presents the above two components of defined benefit costs in the Statement of Profit and Loss in the line item âEmployee Benefits Expensesâ. The present value of the defined benefit plans liability is calculated using a discount rate, which is determined by reference to market yields at the end of the reporting period on government bonds. The retirement benefit obligation recognised in the Balance Sheet represents the actual deficit or surplus in the Companyâs defined benefits plans. Any surplus resulting from this calculation is limited to the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plans or reductions in the future contribution to the plans. Other Long-Term BenefitsThe expected costs of other long-term employee benefits, such as long-term service incentive plan benefits (not being share-based payments), are accrued over the period of employment using the same accounting methodology as used for defined benefits plans. Remeasurement gains and losses, arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions, are charged or credited to the Statement of Profit and Loss in the period in which they arise. 2.12 Employee Share-Based Payments Equity-Settled TransactionsEquity-settled share-based payments to employees are measured by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the grant date using Black-Scholes Model. The fair value, determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments, is charged to profit and loss on the straight-line basis over the vesting period of the option, based on the Companyâs estimate of equity instruments that will eventually vest, with a corresponding increase in equity. In case of forfeiture/lapse stock option, which is not vested, amortised portion is reversed by credit to employee compensatio
Mar 31, 2021
1. GENERAL INFORMATION AND BASIS OF PREPARATION Aditya Birla Capital Limited ("the Companyâ) is a listed public company having its registered office at Indian Rayon Compound, Veraval - 362 266, Gujarat. The Company currently operates as a Non-Deposit Taking Core Investment Company registered with the RBI vide certificate no. B.01.00555, dated 16th October 2015. The Company is a majority owned subsidiary of Grasim Industries Limited. Information on other related party relationship of the Company is provided in Note No. 35. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Indian Accounting Standards ("Ind AS") notified under Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act"), read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended by the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) (Amendment) Rules, 2016. The financial statements are authorised for issue by the Board of Directors of the Company at its meeting held on 14th May 2021. The financial statements have been prepared and presented on the going concern basis and at historical cost, except for the following assets and liabilities, which have been subsequently measured at fair value: ⢠Derivative Financial Instruments measured at fair value, ⢠Certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, and ⢠Employeeâs Defined Benefits Plans as per actuarial valuation. To provide more reliable and relevant information about the effect of certain items in the Standalone Balance Sheet and the Standalone Statement of Profit and Loss, the Company has changed the classification of certain items. Previous period/year figures have been re-grouped or reclassified, to confirm to such current period grouping/ classifications. There is no impact on Equity or Net Loss due to these regrouping/reclassifications. 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 2.1 Presentation of Financial StatementsThe Company presents its financial statements to comply with Division III of Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013, which provides general instructions for the preparation of financial statements of a non-banking financial company (NBFC to comply with Ind AS) and the requirements of Ind AS. An analysis regarding recovery or settlement within 12 months after the reporting date (current) and more than 12 months after the reporting date (non-current) is presented in Note No. 40. Financial assets and financial liabilities are generally reported gross in the Balance Sheet. They are only offset and reported net when, in addition to having an unconditional legally enforceable right to offset the recognised amounts without being contingent on a future event, the parties also intend to settle on a net basis in all of the following circumstances: ⢠The normal course of business, and ⢠The event of default. 2.2 Functional and Presentation CurrencyThe financial statements are presented in Indian Rupees, which is the functional currency of the Company and the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company operates. 2.3 Financial InstrumentsA financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity. Financial AssetsInitial Recognition and MeasurementAll financial assets are recognised initially at fair value. However, in the case of financial assets not recorded at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs that are attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset are added to the fair value. Purchases or sales of financial assets that require delivery of assets within a time frame established by regulation or convention in the market place (regular way trades) are recognised on the trade date, i.e., the date that the Company commits to purchase or sell the asset. Subsequent MeasurementFor purposes of subsequent measurement, financial assets are classified in four categories: ⢠Debt instruments at amortised cost, ⢠Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI), ⢠Debt instruments, derivatives and equity instruments, mutual funds at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL), and ⢠Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI). Debt Instruments at Amortised CostA âdebt instrumentâ is measured at the amortised cost, if both the following conditions are met: a) The asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets for collecting contractual cash flows, and b) Contractual terms of the asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest (SPPI) on the principal amount outstanding. After initial measurement, such financial assets are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate (EIR) method. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation is included in finance income in the Statement of Profit and Loss. The losses arising from impairment are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Debt Instrument at FVTOCIA âdebt instrumentâ is classified as at the FVTOCI, if both of the following criteria are met: a) The objective of the business model is achieved, both by collecting contractual cash flows and selling the financial assets, and b) The assetâs contractual cash flows represent Solely Payments of Principal and Interest (SPPI). Debt instruments included within the FVTOCI category are measured initially, as well as at each reporting date at fair value. Fair value movements are recognised in the other comprehensive income (OCI). However, the Company recognises interest income, impairment losses, and reversals and foreign exchange gain or loss in the Statement of Profit and Loss. On derecognition of the asset, cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in OCI is reclassified from the equity to the Statement of Profit and Loss. Interest earned whilst holding FVTOCI debt instrument is reported as interest income using the EIR method. Debt Instrument at FVTPLFVTPL is a residual category for debt instruments. Any debt instrument, which does not meet the criteria for categorisation as at amortised cost or as FVTOCI, is classified as at FVTPL. In addition, the Company may elect to designate a debt instrument, which otherwise meets amortised cost or FVTOCI criteria, as at FVTPL. However, such election is allowed only if doing so reduces or eliminates a measurement or recognition inconsistency (referred to as âaccounting mismatchâ). Debt instruments included within the FVTPL category are measured at fair value with all changes recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Equity InvestmentsInvestments in Subsidiaries, Associates and Joint Ventures are out of scope of Ind AS 109 and, hence, the Company has accounted for its investments in Subsidiaries, Associates and Joint Ventures at cost. All other equity investments are measured at fair value. Equity instruments, which are held for trading, are classified as at FVTPL. For equity instruments, other than held for trading, the Company has irrevocable option to present in OCI, subsequent changes in the fair value. The Company makes such election on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The classification is made on initial recognition, and is irrevocable. Where the Company classifies equity instruments as at FVTOCI, then all fair value changes on the instrument, excluding dividends, are recognised in the OCI. There is no recycling of the amounts from OCI to the Statement of Profit and Loss, even on sale of investment. Equity instruments included within the FVTPL category are measured at fair value with all changes recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Impairment of Financial AssetsThe Company recognises loss allowances for ECLs on the following financial instruments that are not measured at FVTPL: ⢠Loans and advances to customers; ⢠Debt investment securities; ⢠Trade and other receivables; ⢠Lease receivables; ⢠Irrevocable loan commitments issued; and ⢠Financial guarantee contracts issued. With the exception of Purchased or Originated Credit-Impaired (POCI) financial assets (which are considered separately below), ECLs are required to be measured through a loss allowance at an amount equal to: ⢠12-month ECL, i.e., that result from those default events on the financial instrument that are possible within 12 months after the reporting date (referred to as Stage 1); or ⢠full lifetime ECL, i.e., lifetime ECL that results from all possible default events over the life of the financial instrument (referred to as Stage 2 and Stage 3). A loss allowance for full lifetime ECL is required for a financial instrument, if the credit risk on that financial instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition (and consequently for credit impaired financial assets). For all other financial instruments, ECLs are measured at an amount equal to the 12-month ECL. The Companyâs policy is always to measure loss allowances for lease receivables as lifetime ECL. ECLs are a probability-weighted estimate of the present value of credit losses. These are measured as the present value of the difference between the cash flows due to the Company under the contract and the cash flows that the Company expects to receive arising from the weighting of multiple future economic scenarios, discounted at the assetâs EIR. ⢠for undrawn loan commitments, the ECL is the difference between the present value of the difference between the contractual cash flows that are due to the Company, if the holder of the commitment draws down the loan, and the cash flows that the Company expects to receive, if the loan is drawn down; and ⢠for financial guarantee contracts, the ECL is the difference between the expected payments to reimburse the holder of the guaranteed debt instrument less any amounts that the Company expects to receive from the holder, the debtor or any other party. The Company measures ECL on an individual basis, or on a collective basis for portfolios of loans that share similar economic risk characteristics. The measurement of the loss allowance is based on the present value of the assetâs expected cash flows using the assetâs original EIR, regardless of whether it is measured on an individual basis or a collective basis. Credit-Impaired Financial AssetsA financial asset is âcredit-impairedâ when one or more events, that have a detrimental impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset, have occurred. Credit-impaired financial assets are referred to as Stage 3 assets. Evidence of credit-impairment includes observable data about the following events: ⢠significant financial difficulty of the borrower or issuer; ⢠a breach of contract such as a default or past due event; ⢠the lender of the borrower, for economic or contractual reasons relating to the borrowerâs financial difficulty, having granted to the borrower a concession that the lender would not otherwise consider; ⢠the disappearance of an active market for a security because of financial difficulties; or ⢠the purchase of a financial asset at a deep discount that reflects the incurred credit losses. It may not be possible to identify a single discrete event, instead, the combined effect of several events may have caused financial assets to become credit-impaired. The Company assesses whether debt instruments which are financial assets measured at amortised cost or FVTOCI, are credit-impaired at each reporting date. To assess if corporate debt instruments are credit impaired, the Company considers factors, such as bond yields, credit ratings and the ability of the borrower to raise funding. A loan is considered credit-impaired when a concession is granted to the borrower due to a deterioration in the borrowerâs financial condition, unless there is evidence that, as a result of granting the concession, the risk of not receiving the contractual cash flows has reduced significantly and there are no other indicators of impairment. For financial assets, where concessions are contemplated but not granted, the asset is deemed credit-impaired when there is observable evidence of credit-impairment, including meeting the definition of default. The definition of default (see below) includes unlikeliness to pay indicators and a back-stop, if amounts are overdue for 90 days or more. Purchased or Originated Credit-Impaired (POCI) Financial AssetsPOCI financial assets are treated differently because the asset is credit-impaired at initial recognition. For these assets, the Company recognises all changes in lifetime ECL since initial recognition as a loss allowance with any changes recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. A favourable change for such assets creates an impairment gain. Definition of DefaultCritical to the determination of ECL is the definition of default. The definition of default is used in measuring the amount of ECL and in the determination of whether the loss allowance is based on 12-month or lifetime ECL, as default is a component of the probability of default (PD), which affects both the measurement of ECLs and the identification of a significant increase in credit risk. The Company considers the following as constituting an event of default: ⢠the borrower is past due more than 90 days on any material credit obligation to the Company; or ⢠the borrower is unlikely to pay its credit obligations to the Company in full. The definition of default is appropriately tailored to reflect different characteristics of different types of assets. When assessing, if the borrower is unlikely to pay its credit obligation, the Company takes into account both qualitative and quantitative indicators. The information assessed depends on the type of the asset, for example, in corporate lending a qualitative indicator used is the admittance of bankruptcy petition by National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), which is not relevant for retail lending. Quantitative indicators, such as overdue status and nonpayment on another obligation of the same counterparty, are key inputs in this analysis. The Company uses a variety of sources of information to assess default, which are either developed internally or obtained from external sources. The definition of default is applied consistently to all financial instruments, unless information becomes available that demonstrates that another default definition is more appropriate for a particular financial instrument. Significant Increase in Credit RiskThe Company monitors all financial assets, issued irrevocable loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts that are subject to the impairment requirements to assess whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk, since initial recognition. If there has been a significant increase in credit risk the Company will measure the loss allowance based on lifetime rather than 12-month ECL. The Companyâs accounting policy is not to use the practical expedient that the financial assets with âlowâ credit risk at the reporting date are deemed not to have had a significant increase in credit risk. As a result, the Company monitors all financial assets, issued irrevocable loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts that are subject to impairment for significant increase in credit risk. In assessing whether the credit risk on a financial instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition, the Company compares the risk of a default occurring on the financial instrument at the reporting date based on the remaining maturity of the instrument with the risk of a default occurring that was anticipated for the remaining maturity at the current reporting date when the financial instrument was first recognised. In making this assessment, the Company considers both quantitative and qualitative information that is reasonable, and supportable, including historical experience and forward-looking information, that is available without undue cost or effort, based on the Companyâs historical experience and expert credit assessment. Given that a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition is a relative measure, a given change, in absolute terms, in the probability of default (PD) will be more significant for a financial instrument with a lower initial PD than compared to a financial instrument with a higher PD. Modification and Derecognition of Financial AssetsA modification of a financial asset occurs when the contractual terms governing the cash flows of a financial asset are renegotiated or otherwise modified between initial recognition and maturity of the financial asset. A modification affects the amount and/or timing of the contractual cash flows either immediately or at a future date. In addition, the introduction or adjustment of existing covenants of an existing loan may constitute a modification even if these new or adjusted covenants do not yet affect the cash flows immediately but may affect the cash flows depending on whether the covenant is or is not met (e.g., a change to the increase in the interest rate that arises when covenants are breached). The Company renegotiates loans to customers in financial difficulty to maximise collection and minimise the risk of default. A loan forbearance is granted in cases where, although, the borrower made all reasonable efforts to pay under the original contractual terms, there is a high risk of default or default has already happened and the borrower is expected to be able to meet the revised terms. The revised terms, in most of the cases, include an extension of the maturity of the loan, changes to the timing of the cash flows of the loan (principal and interest repayment), reduction in the amount of cash flows due (principal and interest forgiveness) and amendments to covenants. When a financial asset is modified the Company assesses whether this modification results in derecognition. In accordance with the Companyâs policy a modification results in derecognition when it gives rise to substantially different terms. To determine if the modified terms are substantially different from the original contractual terms, the Company considers the following: ⢠Qualitative factors, such as contractual cash flows after modification, are no longer SPPI, ⢠change in currency or change of counterparty, and ⢠the extent of change in interest rates, maturity, covenants. If these do not clearly indicate a substantial modification, then: A. In the case where the financial asset is derecognised the loss allowance for ECL is remeasured at the date of derecognition to determine the net carrying amount of the asset at that date. The difference between this revised carrying amount and the fair value of the new financial asset with the new terms will lead to a gain or loss on derecognition. The new financial asset will have a loss allowance measured based on 12-month ECL, except in the rare occasions where the new loan is considered to be originated credit-impaired. This applies only in the case where the fair value of the new loan is recognised at a significant discount to its revised par amount because there remains a high risk of default, which has not been reduced by the modification. The Company monitors credit risk of modified financial assets by evaluating qualitative and quantitative information, such as if the borrower is in past due status under the new terms. B. When the contractual terms of a financial asset are modified and the modification does not result in derecognition, the Company determines if the financial assetâs credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition by comparing: ⢠the remaining lifetime PD estimated based on data at initial recognition and the original contractual terms; with ⢠the remaining lifetime PD at the reporting date based on the modified terms. For financial assets modified, where modification did not result in derecognition, the estimate of PD reflects the Companyâs ability to collect the modified cash flows taking into account the Companyâs previous experience of similar forbearance action, as well as various behavioural indicators, including the borrowerâs payment performance against the modified contractual terms. If the credit risk remains significantly higher than what was expected at initial recognition the loss allowance will continue to be measured at an amount equal to lifetime ECL. The loss allowance on forborne loans will generally only be measured based on 12-month ECL, when there is evidence of the borrowerâs improved repayment behaviour following modification leading to a reversal of the previous significant increase in credit risk. Where a modification does not lead to derecognition, the Company calculates the modification gain/loss comparing the gross carrying amount before and after the modification (excluding the ECL allowance). Then the Company measures ECL for the modified asset, where the expected cash flows, arising from the modified financial asset, are included in calculating the expected cash shortfalls from the original asset. The Company derecognises a financial asset only when the contractual rights to the assetâs cash flows expire (including expiry arising from a modification with substantially different terms), or when the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset are transferred to another entity. If the Company neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and continues to control the transferred asset, the Company recognises its retained interest in the asset and an associated liability for amounts it may have to pay. If the Company retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a transferred financial asset, the Company continues to recognise the financial asset and also recognises a collateralised borrowing for the proceeds received. On derecognition of a financial asset in its entirety, the difference between the assetâs carrying amount and the sum of the consideration received and receivable and the cumulative gain/loss that had been recognised in OCI and accumulated in equity is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, with the exception of equity investment designated as measured at FVTOCI, where the cumulative gain/loss previously recognised in OCI is not subsequently reclassified to the Statement of Profit and Loss. On derecognition of a financial asset other than in its entirety (e.g., when the Company retains an option to repurchase part of a transferred asset), the Company allocates the previous carrying amount of the financial asset between the part it continues to recognise under continuing involvement and the part it no longer recognises on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts on the date of the transfer. The difference between the carrying amount allocated to the part that is no longer recognised and the sum of the consideration received for the part no longer recognised and any cumulative gain/loss allocated to it that had been recognised in OCI is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. A cumulative gain/loss that had been recognised in OCI is allocated between the part that continues to be recognised and the part that is no longer recognised on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts. This does not apply for equity investments designated as measured at FVTOCI, as the cumulative gain/loss previously recognised in OCI is not subsequently reclassified to the Statement of Profit and Loss. Write OffLoans and debt securities are written off when the Company has no reasonable expectations of recovering the financial asset (either in its entirety or a portion of it). This is the case when the Company determines that the borrower does not have assets or sources of income that could generate sufficient cash flows to repay the amounts, subject to the write-off. A write-off constitutes a derecognition event. The Company may apply enforcement activities to the financial assets written off. Recoveries resulting from the Companyâs enforcement activities will result in impairment gains. Presentation of Allowance for ECL in the Statement of Balance SheetLoss allowances for ECL are presented in the Statement of Balance Sheet as follows: ⢠for financial assets measured at amortised cost: as a deduction from the gross carrying amount of the assets; and ⢠for debt instruments measured at FVTOCI: no loss allowance is recognised in the Balance Sheet as the carrying amount is at fair value. Where a financial instrument includes both a drawn and an undrawn component, and the Company cannot identify the ECL on the loan commitment component separately from those on the drawn component: the Company presents a combined loss allowance for both components. The combined amount is presented as a deduction from the gross carrying amount of the drawn component. Derecognition of Financial AssetsThe Company derecognises a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or when it transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset to another party. If the Company neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and continues to control the transferred asset, the Company recognises its retained interest in the asset and an associated liability for amounts it may have to pay. If the Company retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a transferred financial asset, the Company continues to recognise the financial asset and also recognises an associated liability. On derecognition of a financial asset in its entirety, the difference between the assetâs carrying amount and the sum of the consideration received and receivable, and the cumulative gain or loss that had been recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity is recognised in profit and loss, if such gain or loss would have otherwise been recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on disposal of that financial assets. On derecognition of a financial asset other than in its entirety (e.g., when the Company retains an option to repurchase part of a transferred asset), the Company allocates the previous carrying amount of the financial assets between the part it continues to recognise under continuing involvement, and the part is no longer recognises on the basis of relative fair values of those parts on the date of transfer. The difference between the carrying amount allocated to the part that is no longer recognised and the sum of consideration received for the part no longer recognised, and any cumulative gain or loss allocated to it that had been recognised in other comprehensive income is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, if such gain or loss would have otherwise been recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on disposal in the Statement of Profit and Loss, if such gain or loss would have otherwise been recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on disposal of that financial asset. A cumulative gain or loss that had been recognised in other comprehensive income is allocated between the part that continues to be recognised and the part that is no longer recognised on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts. Financial Liabilities and Equity InstrumentsClassification as Debt or EquityDebt and equity instruments, issued by the Company, are classified as either financial liabilities or as equity, in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangements and the definitions of a financial liability and an equity instrument. Equity Instruments An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Company after deducting all of its liabilities. Equity instruments issued by the Company are recognised at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs. Financial Liabilities Financial liabilities are classified, at initial recognition: ⢠at fair value through profit or loss, ⢠loans and borrowings, ⢠payables, or ⢠as derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge, as appropriate. All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value, and in the case of loans and borrowings, and payables are recognised net of directly attributable transaction costs. The Companyâs financial liabilities include trade and other payables, loan and borrowings including bank overdrafts, financial guarantee contracts and derivative financial instruments. Subsequent Measurements The measurement of financial liabilities depends on its classification, as described below: Financial Liabilities at FVTPL Financial liabilities at FVTPL include financial liabilities held for trading and financial liabilities designated upon initial recognition as at FVTPL. Financial liabilities are classified as held for trading, if they are incurred for the purpose of repurchasing in the near term. This category also includes derivative financial instruments entered into by the Company, that are not designated as hedging instruments in hedge relationships as defined by Ind AS 109. Separated embedded derivatives are also classified as held for trading, unless they are designated as effective hedging instruments. Gains or losses on liabilities held for trading are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Financial liabilities, designated upon initial recognition at FVTPL, are designated as such at the initial date of recognition, and only if the criteria in Ind AS 109 are satisfied. Loans and BorrowingsAfter initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the Effective Interest Rate (EIR) method. Gains and losses are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss when the liabilities are derecognised, as well as through the EIR amortisation process. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation is included as finance costs in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Derecognition of Financial LiabilitiesThe Company derecognises financial liabilities when, and only when, the Company''s obligations are discharged, cancelled or have expired. The difference between the carrying amount of the financial liability derecognised and the consideration paid and payable is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Offsetting of Financial Instruments Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset, and the net amount is reported in the Balance Sheet, if there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, to realise the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously. 2.4 Fair Value MeasurementsThe Company measures financial instruments, such as investments (other than equity investments in Subsidiaries, Joint Ventures and Associates) and derivatives at fair values at each Balance Sheet date. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement is based on the presumption that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either: In the principal market for the asset or liability, or I n the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The principal or the most advantageous market must be accessible by the Company. The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest. A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participantâs ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use. The Company uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances, and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs. All assets and liabilities (for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial statements) are categorised within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole: Level 1 - Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 - Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is directly or indirectly observable. Level 3 - Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is unobservable. For assets and liabilities that are recognised in the financial statements on a recurring basis, the Company determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by re-assessing categorisation (based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole) at the end of each reporting period. The Management determines the policies and procedures for both recurring fair value measurement, such as derivative instruments and unquoted financial assets measured at fair value, and for non-recurring measurement, such as assets held for disposal in discontinued operations. At each reporting date, the Management analyses the movements in the values of assets and liabilities, which are required to be remeasured or re-assessed as per the Companyâs accounting policies. For this analysis, the Management verifies the major inputs applied in the latest valuation by agreeing the information in the valuation computation to contracts and other relevant documents. 2.5 Cash and Cash EquivalentsCash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand and cash at bank, including fixed deposit with original maturity period of three months or less and short-term highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less, which are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value. 2.6 Investment PropertiesInvestment properties are properties held to earn rentals and/or for capital appreciation (including property under construction for such purposes). Investment properties are measured initially at cost, including transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, investment properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any. The cost includes the cost of replacing parts and borrowing costs for long-term construction projects, if the recognition criteria are met. When significant parts of the investment properties are required to be replaced at intervals, the Company depreciates them separately based on their specific useful lives. All other repair and maintenance costs are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, as incurred. The Company, based on technical assessment made by the Management, depreciates the building over estimated useful lives of 60 years. The Management believes that these estimated useful lives are realistic and reflect fair approximation of the period over which the assets are likely to be used.
Though the Company measures investment property, using cost-based measurement, the fair value of investment property is disclosed in Note No. 54 Fair values are determined based on an annual evaluation performed by an accredited external independent valuer. 2.7 Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) and DepreciationOn transition to Ind AS, the Company has elected to continue with the carrying value of all its PPE recognised as at 1st April 2017, measured as per the previous GAAP, and use that carrying value as the deemed cost of the PPE. PPE are stated at acquisition or construction cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment loss. Cost comprises the purchase price and any attributable cost of bringing the asset to its location and working condition for its intended use, including relevant borrowing costs and any expected costs of decommissioning. If significant parts of an item of PPE have different useful lives, then they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of PPE. The cost of an item of PPE is recognised as an asset if, and only if, it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Company in future periods, and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. Expenditure incurred after the PPE have been put into operations, such as repair and maintenance expenses, are charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss during the period in which they are incurred. Depreciation on PPE is provided on Straight-Line Method using the rates arrived at based on the useful lives as specified in the Schedule II of the Companies Act, 2013, or estimated by the Management. The Company has used the following useful life to provide depreciation on its PPE.
Useful life of assets different from the corresponding life specified in Schedule II has been estimated by the Management supported by technical assessments. The estimated useful lives and residual values of the PPE are reviewed at the end of each financial year. PPE, individually costing less than Rupees five thousand, are fully depreciated in the year of purchase. Depreciation on the PPE added/disposed off/discarded during the year is provided from/upto the date when added/disposed off/discarded. Gains or losses arising from the retirement or disposal of PPE are determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and recognised as income or expense in the Statement of Profit and Loss. 2.8 Intangible Assets and AmortisationOn transition to Ind AS, the Company has elected to continue with the carrying value of all its Intangible Assets recognised as at 1st April 2017, measured as per the previous GAAP and use that carrying value as the deemed cost of the intangible assets. Intangible assets acquired separately are measured on initial recognition at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is their fair value at the date of acquisition. Following initial recognition, intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses, if any. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortised over the useful economic life and assessed for impairment, whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The amortisation period and the amortisation method for an intangible asset with a finite useful life are reviewed at least at the end of each reporting period. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset are considered to modify the amortisation period or method, as appropriate, and are treated as changes in accounting estimates. The amortisation expense on intangible assets with finite lives is recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless such expenditure forms part of carrying value of another asset. Intangible assets are amortised on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortised, but are tested for impairment annually, either individually or at the cash-generating unit level. The assessment of indefinite life is reviewed annually to determine whether the indefinite life continues to be supportable. If not, the change in useful life from indefinite to finite is made on a prospective basis. Gains or losses arising from the retirement or disposal of an intangible asset are determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset, and recognised as income or expense in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Intangible Assets and their useful lives are as under:
The estimated useful lives of the intangible assets and the amortisation period are reviewed at the end of each financial year, and the amortisation period is revised to reflect the changed pattern, if any. Research and Development CostsResearch costs are expensed as incurred. Development expenditures on an individual project are recognised as an intangible asset when the Company can demonstrate: ⢠The technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset so that the asset will be available for use or sale; ⢠How the asset will generate future economic benefits; ⢠The availability of resources to complete the asset; and ⢠The ability to measure reliably the expenditure during development. Following initial recognition of the development expenditure as an asset, the asset is carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses. Amortisation of the asset begins when development is complete and the asset is available for use. It is amortised over the period of expected future benefits. Amortisation expenses are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless such expenditure forms part of carrying value of another asset. During the period of development, the asset is tested for impairment annually. 2.9 Impairment of Non-Financial AssetsAt the end of each reporting period, the Company reviews the carrying amounts of non-financial assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). When it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. When a reasonable and consistent basis of allocation can be identified, corporate assets are also allocated to individual cash-generating units, or otherwise they are allocated to the smallest company of cash-generating units for which a reasonable and consistent allocation basis can be identified. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and intangible assets not yet available for use are tested for impairment, at least annually, and whenever there is an indication then the asset may be impaired. Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use. In assessing the value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted. If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised immediately in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease. When an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or a cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset (or cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised immediately in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase. 2.10 LeasesThe determination of whether an arrangement is (or contains) a lease is based on the substance of the arrangement at the inception of the lease. The arrangement is, or contains, a lease if fulfilment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets, and the arrangement conveys a right-to-use the asset or assets, even if that right is not explicitly specified in an arrangement. Finance LeaseThe Company as a LesseeLeases, where substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item are transferred to the Lessee, are classified as finance lease. The assets acquired under finance lease are capitalised at lower of fair value, and present value of the minimum lease payments at the inception of the lease and disclosed as leased assets. Such assets are amortised over the period of lease or estimated life of such asset, whichever is less. Lease payments are apportioned between the finance charges and reduction of the lease liability based on implicit rate of return. Lease management fees, lease charges and other initial direct costs are capitalised. Operating LeaseThe Company as a LesseeThe Companyâs lease asset classes primarily consist of leases for land and buildings. The Company assesses whether a contract contains a lease, at inception of a contract. A contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. To assess whether a contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset, the Company assesses whether: (1) the contract involves the use of an identified asset; (2) the Company has substantially all of the economic benefits from use of the asset through the period of the lease; and (3) the Company has the right to direct the use of the asset. At the date of commencement of the lease, the Company recognises right-of-use (âROUâ) asset and a corresponding lease liability for all lease arrangements in which it is a lessee, except for leases with a term of 12 months or less (short-term leases) and low value leases. For these shortterm and low value leases, the Company recognises the lease payments as an operating expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Certain lease arrangements include the options to extend or terminate the lease before the end of the lease term. ROU assets and lease liabilities include these options when it is reasonably certain that they will be exercised. Right-of-use assets are initially recognised at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for any lease payments made at or prior to the commencement date of the lease plus any initial direct costs less any lease incentives. They are subsequently measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Right-of-use assets are depreciated from the commencement date on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term and useful life of the under lying asset. Right-of-use assets are evaluated for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. For the purpose of impairment testing, the recoverable amount (i.e., the higher of the fair value less cost to sell and the value-in-use) is determined on an individual asset basis, unless the asset generates cash flows that are largely dependent of those from other assets. In such cases, the recoverable amount is determined for the Cash-Generating Unit (CGU) to which the asset belongs. The lease liability is initially measured at amortised cost at the present value of the future lease payments. The lease payments are discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if not readily determinable, using the incremental borrowing rates in the country of domicile of the leases. Lease liabilities are remeasured with a corresponding adjustment to the related right-of-use asset, if the Company changes its assessment on exercise of an extension or a termination option. Lease liability and ROU asset have been separately presented in the Balance Sheet and lease payments have been classified as financing cash flows. The Company as a Lessor Leases, for which the Company is a lessor, are classified as a finance or operating lease. Whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee, the contract is classified as a finance lease. All other leases are classified as operating leases. When the Company is an intermediate lessor, it accounts for its interests in the head lease and the sub-lease separately. The sub-lease is classified as a finance or operating lease by reference to the right-of-use asset arising from the head lease. For operating leases, rental income is recognised on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant lease. 2.11 Employee BenefitsShort-term Employee BenefitsLiabilities for salaries and wages, including non-monetary benefits and accumulating leave balance in respect of employeesâ services up to the end of the reporting period, are recognised as liabilities (and expenses) and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. The Company also recognises a liability, and records an expense for bonuses (including performance-linked bonuses) where contractually obliged or where there is a past practice that has created a constructive obligation. Defined Contribution PlansProvident Fund: The Company makes defined contributions to employee provident fund and employee pension schemes administered by government organisations, set up under the applicable statute. Superannuation Fund: Superannuation schemes administered by a trust set up by Grasim Industries Limited (âthe Holding Companyâ). Defined Benefits Plans (Gratuity Obligation)The obligation in respect of defined benefits plans, which covers Gratuity, which is provided for on the basis of an actuarial valuation at the end of each financial year. Gratuity is funded with an approved trust. In respect of Gratuity being post-retirement benefits, remeasurements, comprising actuarial gains and losses, the effect of the changes to the asset ceiling, (if applicable) and the return on plan assets (excluding net interest) are reflected immediately in the Balance Sheet with a charge or credit recognised in other comprehensive income in the period in which they occur. Re-measurement recognised in other comprehensive income is reflected immediately in retained earnings, and will not be reclassified to the Statement of Profit and Loss. Past service costs are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss on the earlier of: ⢠the date of the plan amendment or curtailment, and ⢠the date that the Company recognises related restricting costs. The Company recognises the following changes in the net defined benefit obligation under employee benefit expenses in the Statement of Profit and Loss: ⢠service costs (including current service cost, past service cost, as well as gains and losses on curtailments and settlements); and ⢠net interest expenses or income. The Company presents the above two components of defined benefit costs in the Statement of Profit and Loss in the line item âEmployee Benefits Expenseâ. The present value of the defined benefit plans liability is calculated using a discount rate, which is determined by reference to market yields at the end of the reporting period on government bonds. The retirement benefit obligations recognised in the Balance Sheet represent the actual deficit or surplus in the Companyâs defined benefit plans. Any surplus resulting from this calculation is limited to the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plans or reductions in the future contribution to the plans. Other Long-term BenefitsThe expected costs of other long-term employee benefits, such as long-term service incentive plan benefits (not being share-based payments), are accrued over the period of employment using the same accounting methodology as used for defined benefit plans. Re-measurement gains and losses, arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions, are charged or credited to the Statement of Profit and Loss in the period in which they arise. 2.12 Employee Share-Based Payments Equity-Settled TransactionsEquity-settled share-based payments to employees are measured by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the grant date using Black-Scholes Model. The fair value, determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments, is charged to profit and loss on the straight-line basis over the vesting period of the option, based on the Company''s estimate of equity instruments that will eventually vest, with a corresponding increase in equity. In case of forfeiture/lapse stock option, which is not vested, amortised portion is reversed by credit to employee compensation expense. In situation wher
Mar 31, 2019
Notes forming part of the Standalone Financial Statements for the year ended 31st March, 2019 1. GENERAL INFORMATION AND BASIS OF PREPARATION Aditya Birla Capital Limited (formerly known as Aditya Birla Financial Services Limited) (the âCompanyâ) is a listed public company having its registered office at Indian Rayon Compound, Veraval - 362 266, Gujarat. The Company currently operates as a Non-Deposit Taking Systemically Important Core Investment Company (âCIC-ND-SIâ) registered with the RBI vide certificate no. B.01.00555 dated 16th October, 2015. The Company is a majority owned subsidiary of Grasim Industries Limited. Information on other related party relationship of the Company is provided note no. 35. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Indian Accounting Standards (âInd ASâ) notified under Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 (the âActâ) read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 as amended by the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) (Amendment) Rules, 2016. The Company has applied Ind AS starting from financial year beginning on or after 1st April 2018. The financial statements as at and for the year ended 31st March, 2019 are the first financial statements of the Company in accordance with Ind AS. Refer to note no. 58 for information on how the Company adopted Ind AS for all periods up to and including the year ended 31st March, 2018. Upton 31st March 2018, the Company prepared its financial statements in accordance with the Accounting Standards notified under the Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013. The financial statements are authorized for issue by the Board of Directors of the Company at their meeting held on 4th May, 2019. The financial statements have been prepared and presented on the going concern basis and at historical cost, except for the following assets and liabilities, which have been subsequently measured at fair value: - Derivative Financial Instruments measured at fair value. - Certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. - Employee''s Defined Benefit Plan as per actuarial valuation. 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 2.1 Presentation of Financial Statements The Company presents its financial statements to comply with Division III of Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 (which provides general instructions for the preparation of financial statements of a non-banking financial company (NBFC to comply with Ind AS) and the requirements of Ind AS. An analysis regarding recovery or settlement within 12 months after the reporting date (current) and more than 12 months after the reporting date (non-current) is presented in note no. 40 Financial assets and financial liabilities are generally reported gross in the balance sheet. They are only offset and reported net when, in addition to having an unconditional legally enforceable right to offset the recognized amounts without being contingent on a future event, the parties also intend to settle on a net basis in all of the following circumstances: - The normal course of business - The event of default 2.2 Functional and Presentation Currency The financial statements are presented in Indian Rupees, which is the functional currency of the Company and the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company operates. 2.3 Financial Instruments A financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity. Financial Assets Initial recognition and measurement All financial assets are recognized initially at fair value. However, in the case of financial assets not recorded at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs that are attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset are added to the fair value. Purchases or sales of financial assets that require delivery of assets within a time frame established by regulation or convention in the market place (regular way trades) are recognized on the trade date, i.e., the date that the Company commits to purchase or sell the asset. Subsequent measurement For purposes of subsequent measurement, financial assets are classified in four categories: 0 Debt instruments at amortized cost 0 Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI) 0 Debt instruments, derivatives and equity instruments, mutual funds at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) 0 Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI) Debt instruments at amortized cost A âdebt instrument'' is measured at the amortized cost if both the following conditions are met: a) The asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets for collecting contractual cash flows, and b) Contractual terms of the asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest (SPPI) on the principal amount outstanding. After initial measurement, such financial assets are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate (EIR) method. Amortized cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortization is included in finance income in the Statement of Profit and Loss. The losses arising from impairment are recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Debt instrument at FVTOCI A âdebt instrument'' is classified as at the FVTOCI if both of the following criteria are met: a) The objective of the business model is achieved both by collecting contractual cash flows and selling the financial assets, and b) The asset''s contractual cash flows represent Solely Payments of Principal and Interest (SPPI). Debt instruments included within the FVTOCI category are measured initially as well as at each reporting date at fair value. Fair value movements are recognized in the other comprehensive income (OCI). However, the Company recognizes interest income, impairment losses & reversals and foreign exchange gain or loss in the Statement of Profit and Loss. On derecognition of the asset, cumulative gain or loss previously recognized in OCI is reclassified from the equity to Statement of Profit and Loss. Interest earned whilst holding FVTOCI debt instrument is reported as interest income using the EIR method. Debt instrument at FVTPL FVTPL is a residual category for debt instruments. Any debt instrument, which does not meet the criteria for categorisation as at amortized cost or as FVTOCI, is classified as at FVTPL. In addition, the Company may elect to designate a debt instrument, which otherwise meets amortized cost or FVTOCI criteria, as at FVTPL. However, such election is allowed only if doing so reduces or eliminates a measurement or recognition inconsistency (referred to as âaccounting mismatch''). Debt instruments included within the FVTPL category are measured at fair value with all changes recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Equity investments Investments in Subsidiaries, Associates and Joint ventures are out of scope of Ind AS 109 and, hence, the Company has accounted for its investment in Subsidiaries, Associates and Joint venture at cost. All other equity investments are measured at fair value. Equity instruments which are held for trading are classified as at FVTPL. For equity instruments other than held for trading, the Company has irrevocable option to present in OCI subsequent changes in the fair value. The Company makes such election on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The classification is made on initial recognition and is irrevocable. Where the Company classifies equity instruments as at FVTOCI, then all fair value changes on the instrument, excluding dividends, are recognized in the OCI. There is no recycling of the amounts from OCI to Statement of Profit and Loss, even on sale of investment. Equity instruments included within the FVTPL category are measured at fair value with all changes recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Impairment of financial assets The Company recognizes loss allowances for ECLs on the following financial instruments that are not measured at FVTPL: - Loans and advances to customers; - Debt investment securities; - Trade and other receivables; - Lease receivables; - Irrevocable loan commitments issued; and - Financial guarantee contracts issued. With the exception of POCI financial assets (which are considered separately below), ECLs are required to be measured through a loss allowance at an amount equal to: - 12-month ECL, i.e. that result from those default events on the financial instrument that are possible within 12 months after the reporting date, (referred to as Stage 1); or - full lifetime ECL, i.e. lifetime ECL that result from all possible default events over the life of the financial instrument, (referred to as Stage 2 and Stage 3). A loss allowance for full lifetime ECL is required for a financial instrument if the credit risk on that financial instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition (and consequently for credit impaired financial assets). For all other financial instruments, ECLs are measured at an amount equal to the 12 month ECL. The Company''s policy is always to measure loss allowances for lease receivables as lifetime ECL. ECLs are a probability-weighted estimate of the present value of credit losses. These are measured as the present value of the difference between the cash flows due to the Company under the contract and the cash flows that the Company expects to receive arising from the weighting of multiple future economic scenarios, discounted at the asset''s EIR. - for undrawn loan commitments, the ECL is the difference between the present value of the difference between the contractual cash flows that are due to the Company if the holder of the commitment draws down the loan and the cash flows that the Company expects to receive if the loan is drawn down; and - for financial guarantee contracts, the ECL is the difference between the expected payments to reimburse the holder of the guaranteed debt instrument less any amounts that the Company expects to receive from the holder, the debtor or any other party. The Company measures ECL on an individual basis, or on a collective basis for portfolios of loans that share similar economic risk characteristics. The measurement of the loss allowance is based on the present value of the asset''s expected cash flows using the asset''s original EIR, regardless of whether it is measured on an individual basis or a collective basis. Credit-impaired financial assets A financial asset is âcredit-impaired'' when one or more events that have a detrimental impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset have occurred. Credit-impaired financial assets are referred to as Stage 3 assets. Evidence of credit-impairment includes observable data about the following events: - significant financial difficulty of the borrower or issuer; - a breach of contract such as a default or past due event; - the lender of the borrower, for economic or contractual reasons relating to the borrower''s financial difficulty, having granted to the borrower a concession that the lender would not otherwise consider; - the disappearance of an active market for a security because of financial difficulties; or - the purchase of a financial asset at a deep discount that reflects the incurred credit losses. It may not be possible to identify a single discrete eventâinstead, the combined effect of several events may have caused financial assets to become credit-impaired. The Company assesses whether debt instruments that are financial assets measured at amortized cost or FVTOCI are credit-impaired at each reporting date. To assess if corporate debt instruments are credit impaired, the Company considers factors such as bond yields, credit ratings and the ability of the borrower to raise funding. A loan is considered credit-impaired when a concession is granted to the borrower due to a deterioration in the borrower''s financial condition, unless there is evidence that as a result of granting the concession the risk of not receiving the contractual cash flows has reduced significantly and there are no other indicators of impairment. For financial assets where concessions are contemplated but not granted the asset is deemed credit impaired when there is observable evidence of credit-impairment including meeting the definition of default. The definition of default (see below) includes unlikeliest to pay indicators and a back-stop if amounts are overdue for 90 days or more. Purchased or originated credit-impaired (POCI) financial assets POCI financial assets are treated differently because the asset is credit-impaired at initial recognition. For these assets, the Company recognizes all changes in lifetime ECL since initial recognition as a loss allowance with any changes recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss. A favorable change for such assets creates an impairment gain. Definition of default Critical to the determination of ECL is the definition of default. The definition of default is used in measuring the amount of ECL and in the determination of whether the loss allowance is based on 12-month or lifetime ECL, as default is a component of the probability of default (PD) which affects both the measurement of ECLs and the identification of a significant increase in credit risk. The Company considers the following as constituting an event of default: - the borrower is past due more than 90 days on any material credit obligation to the Company; or - the borrower is unlikely to pay its credit obligations to the Company in full. The definition of default is appropriately tailored to reflect different characteristics of different types of assets. When assessing if the borrower is unlikely to pay its credit obligation, the Company takes into account both qualitative and quantitative indicators. The information assessed depends on the type of the asset, for example in corporate lending a qualitative indicator used is the admittance of bankruptcy petition by National Company Low Tribunal (NCLT), which is not relevant for retail lending. Quantitative indicators, such as overdue status and non-payment on another obligation of the same counterparty are key inputs in this analysis. The Company uses a variety of sources of information to assess default which are either developed internally or obtained from external sources. The definition of default is applied consistently to all financial instruments unless information becomes available that demonstrates that another default definition is more appropriate for a particular financial instrument. Significant increase in credit risk The Company monitors all financial assets, issued irrevocable loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts that are subject to the impairment requirements to assess whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition. If there has been a significant increase in credit risk the Company will measure the loss allowance based on lifetime rather than 12-month ECL. The Company''s accounting policy is not to use the practical expedient that financial assets with âlow'' credit risk at the reporting date are deemed not to have had a significant increase in credit risk. As a result the Company monitors all financial assets, issued irrevocable loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts that are subject to impairment for significant increase in credit risk. In assessing whether the credit risk on a financial instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition, the Company compares the risk of a default occurring on the financial instrument at the reporting date based on the remaining maturity of the instrument with the risk of a default occurring that was anticipated for the remaining maturity at the current reporting date when the financial instrument was first recognized. In making this assessment, the Company considers both quantitative and qualitative information that is reasonable and supportable, including historical experience and forward-looking information that is available without undue cost or effort, based on the Company''s historical experience and expert credit assessment. Given that a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition is a relative measure, a given change, in absolute terms, in the probability of default (PD) will be more significant for a financial instrument with a lower initial PD than compared to a financial instrument with a higher PD. Modification and derecognition of financial assets A modification of a financial asset occurs when the contractual terms governing the cash flows of a financial asset are renegotiated or otherwise modified between initial recognition and maturity of the financial asset. A modification affects the amount and/or timing of the contractual cash flows either immediately or at a future date. In addition, the introduction or adjustment of existing covenants of an existing loan may constitute a modification even if these new or adjusted covenants do not yet affect the cash flows immediately but may affect the cash flows depending on whether the covenant is or is not met (e.g. a change to the increase in the interest rate that arises when covenants are breached). The Company renegotiates loans to customers in financial difficulty to maximize collection and minimize the risk of default. A loan forbearance is granted in cases where although the borrower made all reasonable efforts to pay under the original contractual terms, there is a high risk of default or default has already happened and the borrower is expected to be able to meet the revised terms. The revised terms in most of the cases include an extension of the maturity of the loan, changes to the timing of the cash flows of the loan (principal and interest repayment), reduction in the amount of cash flows due (principal and interest forgiveness) and amendments to covenants. When a financial asset is modified the Company assesses whether this modification results in derecognition. In accordance with the Company''s policy a modification results in derecognition when it gives rise to substantially different terms. To determine if the modified terms are substantially different from the original contractual terms the Company considers the following: - Qualitative factors, such as contractual cash flows after modification are no longer SPPI, - change in currency or change of counterparty, - the extent of change in interest rates, maturity, covenants. - If these do not clearly indicate a substantial modification, then; A. In the case where the financial asset is derecognized the loss allowance for ECL is remeasured at the date of derecognition to determine the net carrying amount of the asset at that date. The difference between this revised carrying amount and the fair value of the new financial asset with the new terms will lead to a gain or loss on derecognition. The new financial asset will have a loss allowance measured based on 12-month ECL except in the rare occasions where the new loan is considered to be originated-credit impaired. This applies only in the case where the fair value of the new loan is recognized at a significant discount to its revised par amount because there remains a high risk of default which has not been reduced by the modification. The Company monitors credit risk of modified financial assets by evaluating qualitative and quantitative information, such as if the borrower is in past due status under the new terms. B. When the contractual terms of a financial asset are modified and the modification does not result in derecognition, the Company determines if the financial asset''s credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition by comparing: - the remaining lifetime PD estimated based on data at initial recognition and the original contractual terms; with - the remaining lifetime PD at the reporting date based on the modified terms. For financial assets modified, where modification did not result in derecognition, the estimate of PD reflects the Company''s ability to collect the modified cash flows taking into account the Company''s previous experience of similar forbearance action, as well as various behavioral indicators, including the borrower''s payment performance against the modified contractual terms. If the credit risk remains significantly higher than what was expected at initial recognition the loss allowance will continue to be measured at an amount equal to lifetime ECL. The loss allowance on forborne loans will generally only be measured based on 12-month ECL when there is evidence of the borrower''s improved repayment behavior following modification leading to a reversal of the previous significant increase in credit risk. Where a modification does not lead to derecognition the Company calculates the modification gain/loss comparing the gross carrying amount before and after the modification (excluding the ECL allowance). Then the Company measures ECL for the modified asset, where the expected cash flows arising from the modified financial asset are included in calculating the expected cash shortfalls from the original asset. The Company derecognises a financial asset only when the contractual rights to the asset''s cash flows expire (including expiry arising from a modification with substantially different terms), or when the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset are transferred to another entity. If the Company neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and continues to control the transferred asset, the Company recognizes its retained interest in the asset and an associated liability for amounts it may have to pay. If the Company retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a transferred financial asset, the Company continues to recognize the financial asset and also recognizes a collateralized borrowing for the proceeds received. On derecognition of a financial asset in its entirety, the difference between the asset''s carrying amount and the sum of the consideration received and receivable and the cumulative gain/loss that had been recognized in OCI and accumulated in equity is recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss, with the exception of equity investment designated as measured at FVTOCI, where the cumulative gain/loss previously recognized in OCI is not subsequently reclassified to the Statement of Profit and Loss. On derecognition of a financial asset other than in its entirety (e.g. when the Company retains an option to repurchase part of a transferred asset), the Company allocates the previous carrying amount of the financial asset between the part it continues to recognise under continuing involvement, and the part it no longer recognizes on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts on the date of the transfer. The difference between the carrying amount allocated to the part that is no longer recognized and the sum of the consideration received for the part no longer recognized and any cumulative gain/loss allocated to it that had been recognized in OCI is recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss. A cumulative gain/loss that had been recognized in OCI is allocated between the part that continues to be recognized and the part that is no longer recognized on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts. This does not apply for equity investments designated as measured at FVTOCI, as the cumulative gain/loss previously recognized in OCI is not subsequently reclassified to the Statement of Profit and Loss Write off Loans and debt securities are written off when the Company has no reasonable expectations of recovering the financial asset (either in its entirety or a portion of it). This is the case when the Company determines that the borrower does not have assets or sources of income that could generate sufficient cash flows to repay the amounts subject to the write-off. A write-off constitutes a derecognition event. The Company may apply enforcement activities to financial assets written off. Recoveries resulting from the Company''s enforcement activities will result in impairment gains. Presentation of allowance for ECL in the Statement of Balance Sheet Loss allowances for ECL are presented in the Statement of Balance Sheet as follows: - for financial assets measured at amortized cost: as a deduction from the gross carrying amount of the assets; - for debt instruments measured at FVTOCI: no loss allowance is recognized in the Statement of Balance Sheet as the carrying amount is at fair value. where a financial instrument includes both a drawn and an undrawn component, and the Company cannot identify the ECL on the loan commitment component separately from those on the drawn component: the Company presents a combined loss allowance for both components. The combined amount is presented as a deduction from the gross carrying amount of the drawn component. De-recognition of Financial Assets The Company de-recognizes a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or when it transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset to another party. If the Company neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and continues to control the transferred asset, the Company recognizes its retained interest in the asset and an associated liability for amounts it may have to pay. If the Company retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a transferred financial asset, the Company continues to recognize the financial asset and also recognizes an associated liability. On de-recognition of a financial asset in its entirety, the difference between the asset''s carrying amount and the sum of the consideration received and receivable and the cumulative gain or loss that had been recognized in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity is recognized in profit and loss if such gain or loss would have otherwise been recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss on disposal of that financial assets. On derecognition of a financial asset other than in it''s entirety (e.g. when the Company retains an option to repurchase part of a transferred asset), the Company allocates the previous carrying amount of the financials asset between the part it continues to recognize under continuing involvement, and the part is no longer recognizes on the basis of relative fair values of those parts on the date of transfer. The difference between the carrying amount allocated to the part that is no longer recognized and the sum of consideration received for the part no longer recognized and any cumulative gain or loss allocated to it that had been recognized in other comprehensive income is recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss if such gain or loss would have otherwise been recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss on disposal in the Statement of Profit and Loss if such gain or loss would have otherwise been recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss on disposal of that financial asset. A cumulative gain or loss that had been recognized in other comprehensive income is allocated between the part that continues to be recognized and the part that is no longer recognized on the basis of the relative fair values of those parts. Financial Liabilities and Equity Instruments Classification as Debt or Equity Debt and equity instruments, issued by the Company, are classified as either financial liabilities or as equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangements and the definitions of a financial liability and an equity instrument. Equity Instruments An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Company after deducting all of its liabilities. Equity instruments issued by the Company are recognized at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs. Financial Liabilities Financial liabilities are classified, at initial recognition: - at fair value through profit or loss, - Loans and borrowings, - Payables, or - as derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge, as appropriate. All financial liabilities are recognized initially at fair value and in the case of loans and borrowings and payables, are recognized net of directly attributable transaction costs. The Company''s financial liabilities include trade and other payables, loans and borrowings including bank overdrafts, financial guarantee contracts and derivative financial instruments. Subsequent Measurement The measurement of financial liabilities depends on their classification, as described below: Financial Liabilities at FVTPL Financial liabilities at FVTPL include financial liabilities held for trading and financial liabilities designated upon initial recognition as at FVTPL. Financial liabilities are classified as held for trading, if they are incurred for the purpose of repurchasing in the near term. This category also includes derivative financial instruments entered into by the Company that are not designated as hedging instruments in hedge relationships as defined by Ind AS 109. Separated embedded derivatives are also classified as held for trading, unless they are designated as effective hedging instruments. Gains or losses on liabilities held for trading are recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Financial liabilities, designated upon initial recognition at FVTPL, are designated as such at the initial date of recognition, and only if the criteria in Ind AS 109 are satisfied. Loans and Borrowings After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the Effective Interest Rate (EIR) method. Gains and losses are recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss when the liabilities are derecognized as well as through the EIR amortization process. Amortized cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortization is included as finance costs in the Statement of Profit and Loss. Derecognition of Financial Liabilities The Company de-recognizes financial liabilities when and only when, the Company''s obligations are discharged, cancelled or have expired. The difference between the carrying amount of the financial liability de-recognized and the consideration paid and payable is recognized in Statement of Profit and Loss. Offsetting of Financial Instruments Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the Balance Sheet, if there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognized amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, to realize the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously. 2.4 Fair Value Measurement The Company measures financial instruments, such as investments (other than equity investments in Subsidiaries, Joint Ventures and Associates) and derivatives at fair values at each Balance Sheet date. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement is based on the presumption that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either: In the principal market for the asset or liability, or In the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The principal or the most advantageous market must be accessible by the Company. The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest. A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participant''s ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use. The Company uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximizing the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs. All assets and liabilities (for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial statements) are categorized within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole: Level 1 - Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities Level 2 - Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is directly or indirectly observable Level 3 - Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is unobservable For assets and liabilities that are recognized in the financial statements on a recurring basis, the Company determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by re-assessing categorization (based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole) at the end of each reporting period. The Management determines the policies and procedures for both recurring fair value measurement, such as derivative instruments and unquoted financial assets measured at fair value, and for non-recurring measurement, such as assets held for disposal in discontinued operations. At each reporting date, management analyses the movements in the values of assets and liabilities which are required to be remeasured or re-assessed as per the Company''s accounting policies. For this analysis, the management verifies the major inputs applied in the latest valuation by agreeing the information in the valuation computation to contracts and other relevant documents. 2.5 Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand and cash at bank including fixed deposit with original maturity period of three months or less and short-term highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less which are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value. 2.6 Investment Properties Investment properties are properties held to earn rentals and/or for capital appreciation (including property under construction for such purposes). Investment properties are measured initially at cost, including transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, investment properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any. The cost includes the cost of replacing parts and borrowing costs for long-term construction projects if the recognition criteria are met. When significant parts of the investment property are required to be replaced at intervals, the company depreciates them separately based on their specific useful lives. All other repair and maintenance costs are recognized in Statement of Profit and Loss as incurred. Though the Company measures investment property using cost based measurement, the fair value of investment property is disclosed in Note 52. Fair value are determined based on an annual evaluation performed by an accredited external independent valuer. 2.7 Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) and Depreciation On transition to Ind AS, the Company has elected to continue with the carrying value of all its property plant and equipment recognized as at 1st April, 2017 measured as per the previous GAAP, and use that carrying value as the deemed cost of the property, plant and equipment. Property, plant and equipment are stated at acquisition or construction cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment loss. Cost comprises the purchase price and any attributable cost of bringing the asset to its location and working condition for its intended use, including relevant borrowing costs and any expected costs of decommissioning. If significant parts of an item of PPE have different useful lives, then they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of PPE. The cost of an item of PPE is recognized as an asset if, and only if, it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Company in future periods and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. Expenditure incurred after the PPE have been put into operations, such as repair and maintenance expenses are charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss during the period in which they are incurred. Depreciation on tangible fixed assets is provided on Straight Line Method using the rates arrived at based on the useful lives as specified in the Schedule II of the Companies Act, 2013 or estimated by the management. The Company has used the following useful life to provide depreciation on its Property Plant and Equipment. Useful life of assets different from the corresponding life specified in Schedule II has been estimated by management supported by technical assessments. The estimated useful lives and residual values of the Property Plant and Equipment are reviewed at the end of each financial year. Property Plant and Equipment, individually costing less than Rupees five thousand, are fully depreciated in the year of purchase. Depreciation on the Property Plant and Equipment added/disposed off/discarded during the year is provided from/upto the date when added/disposed off/discarded. Gains or losses arising from the retirement or disposal of Property Plant and Equipment are determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and recognized as income or expense in the Statement of Profit and Loss. 2.8 Intangible assets and amortization On transition to Ind AS, the Company has elected to continue with the carrying value of all its Intangible Assets recognized as at 1st April, 2017 measured as per the previous GAAP and use that carrying value as the deemed cost of the Intangible Assets. Intangible assets acquired separately are measured on initial recognition at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is their fair value at the date of acquisition. Following initial recognition, intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses, if any. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over the useful economic life and assessed for impairment whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The amortization period and the amortization method for an intangible asset with a finite useful life are reviewed at least at the end of each reporting period. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset are considered to modify the amortization period or method, as appropriate, and are treated as changes in accounting estimates. The amortization expense on intangible assets with finite lives is recognized in the statement of profit and loss unless such expenditure forms part of carrying value of another asset. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are tested for impairment annually, either individually or at the cash-generating unit level. The assessment of indefinite life is reviewed annually to determine whether the indefinite life continues to be supportable. If not, the change in useful life from indefinite to finite is made on a prospective basis. Gains or losses arising from the retirement or disposal of an intangible asset are determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and recognized as income or expense in the Statement of Profit and Loss. The estimated useful lives of the intangible assets and the amortization period are reviewed at the end of each financial year and the amortization period is revised to reflect the changed pattern, if any. Research and development costs Research costs are expensed as incurred. Development expenditures on an individual project are recognized as an intangible asset when the Company can demonstrate: 0 The technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset so that the asset will be available for use or sale 0 How the asset will generate future economic benefits 0 The availability of resources to complete the asset 0 The ability to measure reliably the expenditure during development Following initial recognition of the development expenditure as an asset, the asset is carried at cost less any accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses. Amortization of the asset begins when development is complete and the asset is available for use. It is amortized over the period of expected future benefits. Amortization expenses are recognized in the statement of profit and loss unless such expenditure forms part of carrying value of another asset. During the period of development, the asset is tested for impairment annually. 2.9 Impairment of non-financial assets At the end of each reporting period, the Company reviews the carrying amounts of non-financial assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). When it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. When a reasonable and consistent basis of allocation can be identified, corporate assets are also allocated to individual cash-generating units, or otherwise they are allocated to the smallest Company of cash-generating units for which a reasonable and consistent allocation basis can be identified. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and intangible assets not yet available for use are tested for impairment at least annually, and whenever there is an indication then the asset may be impaired. Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use. In assessing the value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted. If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognized immediately in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease. When an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or a cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset (or cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognized immediately in the Statement of Profit and Loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase. 2.10 Leases The determination of whether an arrangement is (or contains) a lease is based on the substance of the arrangement at the inception of the lease. The arrangement is, or contains, a lease if fulfillment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets and the arrangement conveys a right to use the asset or assets, even if that right is not explicitly specified in an arrangement. Finance Lease As a Lessee Leases, where substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item are transferred to the Lessee, are classified as finance lease. The assets acquired under finance lease are capitalized at lower of fair value and present value of the minimum lease payments at the inception of the lease and disclosed as leased assets. Such assets are amortized over the period of lease or estimated life of such asset, whichever is less. Lease payments are apportioned between the finance charges and reduction of the lease liability based on implicit rate of return. Lease management fees, lease charges and other initial direct costs are capitalized. Operating Lease As a Lessee Leases, where significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor, are classified as operating leases and lease rentals thereon are charged to the statement of profit and loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term, unless the lease agreements explicitly states that the increase is on account of inflation. As a Lessor The Company has leased Investment Property, and such leases, where the Company has substantially retained all the risks and rewards of ownership, are classified as operating leases. Lease income is recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss on a straight-line basis over lease term, unless the lease agreements explicitly states that the increase is on account of inflation. 2.11 Employee Benefits Short-Term Employee Benefits Liabilities for salaries and wages, including non-monetary benefits and accumulating leave balance in respect of employees'' services up to the end of the reporting period, are recognized as liabilities (and expensed) and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. The Company also recognizes a liability and records an expense for bonuses (including performance-linked bonuses) where contractually obliged or where there is a past practice that has created a constructive obligation. Defined Contribution Plan Provident Fund: The Company makes defined contributions to employee provident fund and employee pension schemes administered by government organizations set up under the applicable statute. Superannuation Fund: Superannuation schemes administered by a trust set up by Grasim Industries Limited (the âHolding Companyâ). Defined Benefit Plan (gratuity obligation) The obligation in respect of defined benefit plans, which covers Gratuity, which is provided for on the basis of an actuarial valuation at the end of each financial year. Gratuity is funded with an approved trust. In respect of Gratuity being Post Retirement benefits, re-measurements, comprising actuarial gains and losses, the effect of the changes to the asset ceiling (if applicable) and the return on plan assets (excluding net interest), is reflected immediately in the Balance Sheet with a charge or credit recognized in other comprehensive income in the period in which they occur. Re-measurement recognized in other comprehensive income is reflected immediately in retained earnings and will not be reclassified to Statement of Profit and Loss. Past service costs are recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss on the earlier of: - The date of the plan amendment or curtailment, and - The date that the Company recognizes related restricting costs The Company recognizes the following changes in the net defined benefit obligation under employee benefit expenses in the Statement of Profit and Loss: - service cost (including current service cost, past service cost, as well as gains and losses on curtailments and settlements); and - net interest expense or income; The Company presents the above two components of defined benefit costs in Statement of Profit and Loss in the line item âEmployee Benefits Expense''. The present value of the defined benefit plan liability is calculated using a discount rate, which is determined by reference to market yields at the end of the reporting period on government bonds. The retirement benefit obligation recognized in the Balance Sheet represents the actual deficit or surplus in the Company''s defined benefit plans. Any surplus resulting from this calculation is limited to the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plans or reductions in the future contribution to the plans. Other Long-Term Benefits The expected costs of other long-term employee benefits such as long term service incentive plan benefits (not being share based payments) are accrued over the period of employment using the same accounting methodology as used for defined benefit plans. Re-measurement gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited to the Statement of Profit and Loss in the period in which they arise. 2.12 Employee Share based payments Equity-settled transactions Equity-settled share-based payments to employees are measured by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the grant date using Black Scholes Model. The fair value, determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments, is charged to profit and loss on the straight-line basis over the vesting period of the option, based on the Company''s estimate of equity instruments that will eventually vest, with a corresponding increase in equity. In case of forfeiture/lapse stock option, which is not vested, amortized portion is reversed by credit to employee compensation expense. In situation where the stock option expires unexercised, the related balance standing to the credit of the Employee Stock Options Outstanding Account is transferred within equity. 2.13 Foreign Currency Transactions In preparing the financial statements of the Company, transactions in foreign currencies, are recognized at the rates of exchange prevailing at the dates of the transactions. At the end of each reporting period, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rate prevailing at that date. Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are not re-translated. Exchange differences on monetary items are recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss in the period in which these arise, except for: a) exchange differences on foreign currency borrowings relating to assets under construction for future productive use, which are included in the cost of those assets when they are regarded as an adjustment to interest costs on those foreign currency borrowings; b) exchange differences relating to qualifying effective cash flow hedges; and c) Exchange difference arising on re-statement of long-term monetary items that in substance forms part of Company''s net investment in foreign operations, is accumulated in Foreign Currency Translation Reserve (component of OCI) until the disposal of the investment, at which time such exchange difference is recognized in the Statement of Profit and Loss. 2.14 Revenue Recognition Revenue is recognized to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefit will flow to the Company and the revenue can be reliably measured. a) Dividend income is accounted for when the right to receive the income is established, which generally when the shareholders approves the dividend. b) Interest income is accounted for all financial instruments measured at amortized cost or at fair value through other comprehensive income, interest income is recorded using the effective interest rate (EIR), which is the rate that exactly discounts the estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument to the gross carrying amount of the financial asset. Interest income on all trading assets and financial assets mandatorily required to be measured at FVTPL is recognized using the contractual interest rate in net gain on fair value changes. 2.15 Borrowings Costs Borrowing cost attributable to acquisition and construction of qualifying assets are capitalized as a part of the cost of such assets up to the date when such assets are ready for its intended use. Other borrowing costs are charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss in the period in which they are incurred. 2.16 Provision for Current and Deferred Tax Current tax is measured on the basis of estimated taxable income for the current accounting period in accordance with the applicable tax rates and the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the rules framed there under. Deferred tax is recognized using the Balance Sheet approach on the temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to the temporary differences when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset, if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and these relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority and are intended to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or such tax assets and liabilities will be realized simultaneously. In the event of unabsorbed depreciation or carry forward of losses under tax laws, deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that sufficient future taxable income will be available to realize such assets. A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the temporary difference can be utilized. The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at the end of each reporting period and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the assets to be recovered. Current and deferred tax are recognized in Statement of Profit and Loss, except when the same relate to items that are recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, in which case, the current and deferred tax relating to such items are also recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity respectively. 2.17 Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) MAT is recognized as an asset only when and to the extent there is convincing evidence that the Company will pay normal Income Tax during the specified period. In the year in which the MAT credit becomes eligible to be recognized, it is credited to the statement of profit and loss and is considered as (MAT Credit Entitlement). The Company reviews the same at each Balance Sheet date and writes down the carrying amount of MAT Credit Entitlement to the extent there is no longer convincing evidence to the effect that the Company will pay normal Income Tax during the specified period. Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) Credit are in the form of unused tax credits that are carried forward by the Company for a specified period of time, hence, it is presented with Deferred Tax Asset. 2.18 Provisions and Contingent Liabilities Provisions are recognized when the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that the Company will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows to net present value using an appropriate pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. A present obligation that arises from past events, where it is either not probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle or a reliable estimate of the amount cannot be made, is disclosed as a contingent liability. Contingent liabilities are also disclosed when there is a possible obligation arising from past events, the existence of which will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the Company. Claims against the Company, where the possibility of any outflow of resources in settlement is remote, are not disclosed as contingent liabilities. Contingent assets are not recognized in the financial statements since this may result in the recognition of income that may never be realized. However, when the realization of income is virtually certain, then the related asset is not a contingent asset and is recognized. 2.19 Statement of Cash Flows Statement of Cash flows are reported using the indirect method, whereby the net profit before tax is adjusted for the effects of transactions of a non-cash nature, any deferrals or accruals of past or future operating cash receipts or payments and item of income or expenses associated with investing or financing cash flows. The statement of cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities of the Company are segregated. 2.20 Earnings Per Share (EPS) The basic EPS is computed by dividing the profit after tax for the year attributable to the equity shareholders by the weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the year. For the purpose of calculating diluted EPS, profit after tax for the year attributable to the equity shareholders and the weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the year are adjusted for the effects of all dilutive potential equity shares. 2.21 Standard issued but not yet effective On 30th March, 2019, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs issued the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) (Amendments) Rules, 2019, notifying Ind AS 116 on Leases. Ind AS 116 would replace the existing leases standard Ind AS 17. The standard sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosures for both parties to a contract, i.e. the lessee and the lessor. Ind AS 116 introduces a single lease accounting model and requires a lessee to recognize assets and liabilities for all leases with a term of more than 12 months, unless the underlying asset is of low value. Currently for operating lease, rentals are charged to the statement of profit and loss. The Group is currently evaluating the implication of Ind AS 116 on the financial statements. The Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Amendment Rules, 2019 notified amendments to the following accounting standards. The amendments would be effective from 1st April, 2019. a. Ind AS 12, Income taxes â Appendix C on uncertainty over income tax treatments b. Ind AS 19 â Employee benefits c. Ind AS 23 â Borrowing costs d. Ind AS 28 â investment in associates and joint ventures e. Ind AS 103 and Ind AS 111 â Business combinations and joint arrangements f. Ind AS 109 â Financial instruments The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of such amendments. 2.22 Significant Accounting Judgements, Estimates and Assumptions The preparation of financial statements, in conformity, with the Ind AS requires judgments, estimates and assumptions to be made, that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities on the date of the financial statements, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period and the disclosures relating to contingent liabilities as of the date of the financial statements. Although these estimates are based on the management''s best knowledge of current events and actions, uncertainty about these assumptions and estimates could result in outcomes different from the estimates. Difference between actual results and estimates are recognized in the period in which the results are known or materialise. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Any revision to accounting estimates is recognized prospectively in the current and future periods. Judgements Aditya Birla Capital Limited holds either directly or through its subsidiary, more than half of the equity share holding in following entities. However, as per the shareholders'' agreement/ statute, Company need to jointly decide with other shareholders of the respective entity on certain relevant activities. Hence the same are being accounted as per equity method of accounting a) Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited (Formerly Known as Birla Sun Life Asset Management Company Limited) b) Aditya Birla Sun Life Trustee Private Limited (Formerly Known as Birla Sun Life Trustee company private Limited.) c) Aditya Birla Wellness Private Limited Estimates and Assumptions The key assumptions concerning the future and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the reporting date, that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of asset and liabilities within the next financial year, are described below. The Company based its assumptions and estimates on parameters available when the financial statements were prepared. Existing circumstances and assumptions about future developments, however, may change due to market changes or circumstances arising that are beyond the control of the Company. Such changes are reflected in the assumptions when they occur. Useful Lives of Property, Plant and Equipment The Company uses i
Mar 31, 2018
I. Use of Estimate The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Indian GAAP requires the management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affects the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities, at the end of the reporting period. Although, these estimates are based on the managementâs best knowledge of current events and actions, uncertainty about these assumptions and estimates could result in the outcomes requiring a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities in future periods. II. Tangible Fixed Assets and Depreciation Tangible fixed assets, capital work in progress are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and impairment loss, if any. Cost comprises of the purchase price and any attributable cost of bringing the asset to its working condition for its intended use. When significant parts of plant and equipments are required to be replaced at intervals, the Company recognises such parts as individual assets with specific useful life and depreciates them accordingly. Any trade discounts and rebates are deducted in arriving at the purchase price. Depreciation on tangible fixed assets is provided on Straight Line Method based on the useful lives as specified in the Schedule II of the Companies Act, 2013 or as estimated by the management. The Company has used the following useful life to provide depreciation on its fixed assets. Useful life of assets different from corresponding life specified in Schedule II has been estimated by the Management and supported by technical assessment. The estimated useful lives and residual values of the tangible fixed assets are reviewed at the end of each financial year. Tangible fixed assets, individually costing less than Rupees five thousands, are fully depreciated in the year of purchase. Depreciation on the tangible fixed assets added/disposed off/discarded during the year is provided on pro-rata basis with reference to the month of addition/disposal/discarding. Gains or losses arising from the retirement or disposal of tangible fixed assets are determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and recognised as income or expense in the Statement of Profit and Loss. III. Intangible Assets and Amortisation Intangible assets are stated at acquisition cost, net of accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses, if any. Intangible assets are amortised on a straight line basis over their estimated useful life which is estimated at three years. The estimated useful life of the intangible assets and the amortisation period are reviewed at the end of each financial year and the amortisation period is revised to reflect the changed pattern, if any. Gains or losses arising from the retirement or disposal of an intangible asset are determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and recognised as income or expense in the Statement of Profit and Loss. IV. Impairment of Assets The carrying amounts of assets are reviewed at each Balance Sheet date if there is any indication of impairment based on internal/external factors. An asset is treated as impaired when the carrying cost of the assets exceeds its recoverable value. An impairment loss, if any, is charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss in the year in which an asset is identified as impaired. Reversal of impairment losses recognised in the prior years is recorded when there is an indication that the impairment losses recognised for the assets no longer exist or have decreased. V. Investments Investments, which are readily realisable and intended to be held for not more than one year from the date on which such investments are made, are classified as current investments. All other investments are classified as long-term investments. On initial recognition, all investments are measured at cost. The cost comprises purchase price and directly attributable acquisition charges such as brokerage, fees and duties. Current investments are carried in the financial statements at lower of cost and net realisable value determined on an individual investment basis. Long-term investments are carried at cost. However, provision for diminutions in value is made to recognise a decline other than temporary in the value of the investments. Long term investments are stated at cost after deducting provisions made, if any, for other than temporary diminution in the value. On disposal of an investment, the difference between its carrying amount and net disposal proceeds is charged or credited to the Statement of Profit and Loss. VI. Revenue Recognition Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Company and can be reliably measured. Interest Income is recognised on a time proportion basis taking into account the amount outstanding and applicable interest rate. Dividend income on investments is accounted for when the right to receive the payment is established. Profit or loss on sale of current investments is determined on the basis of the weighted average cost method. Gain or loss on long term investments is accounted on actual receipt in excess of cost of investment recognised in books. VII. Foreign Currency Transactions Initial Recognition Foreign currency transactions are recorded in the reporting currency, by applying to the foreign currency amount, the exchange rate between the reporting currency and the foreign currency at the date of the transaction. Conversion Foreign currency monetary items are retranslated using the exchange rate prevailing at the reporting rate. Non-monetary items, which are measured in terms of historical cost denominated in a foreign currency, are reported using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary items, which are measured at fair value or other similar valuation denominated in a foreign currency, are translated using the exchange rate at the date when such value was determined. Exchange Differences The Company accounts for exchange differences arising on translation/settlement of foreign currency monetary items as below: 1. Exchange differences arising on a monetary item that, in substance, forms part of the Companyâs net investment in a non-integral foreign operation is accumulated in the foreign currency translation reserve until the disposal of the net investment. On the disposal of such net investment, the cumulative amount of the exchange differences which have been deferred and which relate to that investment is recognised as income or as expenses in the same period in which the gain or loss on disposal is recognised. 2. Exchange differences arising on other long-term foreign currency monetary items are accumulated in the âForeign Currency Monetary Item Translation Difference Accountâ and amortised over the remaining life of the concerned monetary item. 3. All other exchange differences are recognised as income or as expenses in the period in which they arise. VIII. Taxation Tax expense comprises of current and deferred tax. Provision for current tax is made on the basis of estimated taxable income for the current accounting year in accordance with the Income Tax Act, 1961. Current tax assets and current tax liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle the asset and the liability on a net basis. The deferred tax for timing differences between the book and tax profits for the year is accounted for, using the tax rates and laws that have been substantively enacted as of the Balance Sheet date. Deferred tax assets arising from timing differences are recognised to the extent there is reasonable certainty that these would be realised in future. The carrying amount of deferred tax assets are reviewed at each Balance Sheet date. The Company writes down the carrying amount of a deferred tax asset to the extent that it is no longer reasonably certain, that sufficient future taxable income will be available against which deferred tax asset can be realised. Any such write-down is reversed to the extent that it becomes reasonably certain, that sufficient future taxable income will be available. In case of unabsorbed losses and unabsorbed depreciation, all deferred tax assets are recognised only if there is virtual certainty supported by convincing evidence that they can be realised against future taxable profit. At each Balance Sheet date the Company reassesses the deferred tax assets. Minimum Alternative Tax (MAT) credit is recognised as an asset only when and to the extent there is convincing evidence that the Company will pay normal income tax during the specified period. In the year in which the MAT credit becomes eligible to be recognised as an asset in accordance with the recommendations contained in Guidance Note issued by the ICAI, the said asset is created by way of a credit to the Statement of Profit and Loss and shown as MAT Credit Entitlement. The Company reviews the same at each Balance Sheet date and writes down the carrying amount of MAT Credit Entitlement to the extent there is no longer convincing evidence to the effect that the Company will pay normal Income Tax during the specified period. IX. Employee Benefits a) Short-term Obligations Liabilities for salaries and wages, including non-monetary benefits and accumulating leave balance in respect of employeesâ services up to the end of the reporting period, are recognised as liabilities (and expensed) and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. The Company also recognises a liability and records an expense for bonuses (including performance-linked bonuses) where contractually obliged or where there is a past practice that has created a constructive obligation. The obligations are presented as a part of âTrade Payablesâ or âShort Term Provisionsâ in the balance sheet if the Company does not have an unconditional right to defer settlement for at least twelve months after the reporting period, regardless of when the actual settlement is expected to occur. b) Post-employment Obligations The Company operates various post-employment schemes, including both defined contribution and defined benefit plans. 1) Defined contribution plans The Company makes defined contributions to employee provident fund and employee pension schemes administered by government organisations set up under the applicable statute and those administered by a trust set up by Grasim Industries Limited (the âHolding Companyâ) and superannuation schemes administered by a trust set up by the Company. The Company has no further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid except to contribute additionally any shortfall in the annual yield on the plan assets as compared to the annual return on such accumulated prescribed by the Central Government (there were no such additional contributions due from the Company as of 31st March, 2018 and 31st March, 2017). The contributions are recognised as a part of âEmployee Benefits Expensesâ in the period in which the employee renders services against which such contributions are due. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the future payments is available. The liabilities are presented within âOther Current Liabilitiesâ or, as the case may be, within âShort-term Provisionsâ in the balance sheet. 2) Defined benefit plan (gratuity obligation) The liability or asset recognised in the balance sheet in respect of gratuity scheme is the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the end of the reporting period less the fair value of plan assets. The defined benefit obligation is calculated annually by actuaries as the present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the end of the reporting period using the projected unit credit method. Consideration is given to expected future wage and salary levels, experience of employee departures and periods of service. Expected future payments are discounted using market yields at the end of the reporting period of government bonds with terms that match, as closely as possible, the estimated future cash outflows. Re-measurements as a result of experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss as a part of âEmployee Benefits Expenseâ. Changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligation resulting from plan amendments or curtailments (past service costs) are recognised immediately in the Statement of Profit and Loss as âEmployee Benefits Expenseâ. The liability so determined is presented within âShort Term Provisionsâ in the balance sheet as the Company will this amount to the Gratuity Fund within the next twelve months. Gratuity claims by employees where the Company does not have an unconditional right to defer settlement for at least twelve months after the reporting period, are classified as âOther Current Liabilitiesâ. c) Other long-term employee benefits obligations The expected costs of other long-term employee benefits such as long service incentive plan benefits (not being share based payments) are accrued over the period of employment using the same accounting methodology as used for defined benefit plans. Re-measurement gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited to the Statement of Profit and Loss in the period in which they arise. The obligations are presented as a part of âTrade Payablesâ or âShort-term Provisionsâ in the balance sheet if the Company does not have an unconditional right to defer settlement for at least twelve months after the reporting period, regardless of when the actual settlement is expected to occur. Otherwise these are classified within âLongterm Provisionsâ. X. Share Based Payments The Employee Option Plan is administered by the Company. Share-based compensation benefits are provided to employees via Employee Stock Option Plan and Restricted Stock Units. Information relating to these schemes is set out in Note No. 36 below. The intrinsic value of options granted (as of the date of grant), is recognised as an âEmployee Benefits Expenseâ with a corresponding increase in equity (through a credit to the âShare Options Outstanding Accountâ). The total amount to be expensed is determined by reference to the intrinsic value of the options granted and is charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss over the vesting period, which is the period over which all of the specified vesting conditions are to be satisfied. At the end of each period, the entity revises its estimates of the number of options that are expected to vest based on the non-market vesting and service conditions. It recognises the impact of the revision to original estimates, if any, in the Statement of Profit and Loss, with a corresponding adjustment to equity. Where existing stock options have been repriced, the change in the intrinsic value of the Option is adjusted against the âEmployee Benefits Expensesâ over the remaining vesting period. In the case of forfeiture of any of the outstanding stock options that have not vested, the amortised expense is reversed. Where a stock option remains unexercised, the corresponding amount credited to the Stock Options Outstanding Account is transferred to the General Reserve. XI. Contingent Liabilities and Provisions A provision is recognised when the Company has a present obligation as a result of past events and it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation in respect of which a reliable estimate can be made. Provisions (excluding employee benefits) are not discounted to their present value and are determined based on the best estimate required to settle the obligation at the Balance Sheet date. These are reviewed at each Balance Sheet date and adjusted to reflect the current best estimates. Contingent liabilities are disclosed in the Notes. Contingent assets are neither recognised nor disclosed in the financial statements. XII. Provision for Non-Performing Assets and Other Contingencies The Company policy is to carry adequate amounts in the Provision for Non-Performing Assets Account and the Provision and Contingencies account to cover the amount outstanding in respect of all non-performing assets and standard assets respectively as also all other contingencies. All loans and other credit exposures where the interest and/or instalments are overdue for specified number of days and more are classified as non-performing assets in accordance with the prudential norms prescribed by the Reserve Bank of India. The provision for non-performing assets is deducted from loans and advances. XIII. Standard Asset Provisioning (Collective Allowances) Provisions are established on a collective basis against loan assets classified as âStandardâ to absorb credit losses on the aggregate exposures in each of the Companyâs loan portfolios based on the Reserve Bank of India Directions. A higher standard asset provision may be made based upon an analysis of past performance, level of allowance already in place and Managementâs judgement. This estimate includes consideration of economic and business conditions. The amount of the collective allowance for credit losses is the amount that is required to establish a balance in the Provision for Standard Assets Account that the Company management considers adequate, after consideration of the prescribed minimum under the above mentioned directions, to absorb credit related losses in its portfolio of loan items after individual allowances or write offs. XIV. Leases Leases in which the Company does not transfer substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the asset are classified as operating leases. Assets subject to operating leases are included in fixed assets. Lease income on an operating lease is recognised in the statement of profit and loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Costs, including depreciation, are recognised as an expense in the statement of profit and loss. Initial direct costs such as legal costs, brokerage costs, etc. are recognised immediately in the statement of profit and loss. XV. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents for the purposes of cash flow statement comprise cash at bank and in hand and short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less. XVI. Borrowing Costs Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of an asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale are capitalised as part of the cost of the asset. All other borrowing costs are expensed in the period in which they occur. Borrowing costs consist of interest and other costs that an entity incurs in connection with the borrowing of funds. Borrowing cost also includes exchange differences to the extent regarded as an adjustment to the borrowing costs. XVII. Cash Flow Statement Cash flows are reported using the indirect method, whereby net profit before tax is adjusted for the effects of transactions of a non-cash nature, any deferrals or accruals of past or future operating cash receipts or payments and item of income or expenses associated with investing or financing cash flows. The cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities of the Company are segregated based on the available information. XVIII. Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing the net profit or loss for the period attributable to equity shareholders (after deducting preference dividends and attributable taxes) by the weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the year. The weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the year and for all periods presented is adjusted for events, such as bonus shares, other than the conversion of potential equity shares that have changed the number of equity shares outstanding, without a corresponding change in resources. For the purpose of calculating diluted earnings per share, the net profit or loss for the year attributable to equity shareholders and the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period is adjusted for the effects of all dilutive potential equity shares.
Mar 31, 2017
(a) Basis of Preparation The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in India (Indian GAAP) under the historical cost convention on an accrual basis in compliance with all material aspect of the Accounting Standard (AS) Notified under section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 read together with paragraph 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 and the Companies (Accounting Standards) Amendment Rules, 2016. The accounting policies have been consistently applied by the Company and are consistent with those used in the previous year All assets and liabilities have been classified as current or non-current as per the Companyâs normal operating cycle, and other criteria set out in the Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013. Based on the nature of products and services and the time between the acquisition of assets for processing and their realization in cash and cash equivalents, the Company has ascertained its operating cycle as up to twelve months for the purpose of current/non-current classification of assets and liabilities. (b) Use of Estimate The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Indian GAAP requires the management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affects the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities, at the end of the reporting period. Although, these estimates are based on the managementâs best knowledge of current events and actions, uncertainty about these assumptions and estimates could result in the outcomes requiring a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities in future periods. (c) Property, Plant and Equipments Plant and equipments, capital work in progress are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and impairment loss, if any. Cost comprises of the purchase price and any attributable cost of bringing the asset to its working condition for its intended use. When significant parts of plant and equipments are required to be replaced at intervals, the Company recognises such parts as individual assets with specific useful life and depreciates them accordingly. Likewise, when a major inspection is performed, its cost is recognized in the carrying amount of the plant and equipments as a replacement if the recognition criteria are satisfied. Any trade discounts and rebates are deducted in arriving at the purchase price. Depreciation on tangible fixed assets is provided on straight line basis using the rates arrived at based on the useful estimated life by the management. The Company has used the following useful life to provide depreciation on its fixed assets. Useful life of assets different from those prescribed in Schedule II has been estimated by the Management and supported by technical assessment. Fixed Assets, individually costing less than Rupees five thousands, are fully depreciated in the year of purchase. Depreciation on the fixed assets added/disposed off / discarded during the year is provided on pro-rata basis with reference to the month of addition/disposal/discarding. (d) Intangible Assets and Amortisation Intangible assets are stated at acquisition cost, net of accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses, if any. Cost comprises the purchase price and any attributable cost of bringing the asset to its working condition for its intended use. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight line basis over their estimated useful life which is estimated at 3 years. The amortization period and the amortization method are reviewed at each financial year end. If the expected useful life of the asset is significantly different from previous estimates, the amortization period is changed accordingly. Gains or losses arising from the retirement or disposal of an intangible asset are determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and recognized as income or expense in the Statement of Profit and Loss. (e) Impairment of Assets The carrying amounts of assets are reviewed at each Balance Sheet date if there is any indication of impairment based on internal/external factors. An asset is treated as impaired when the carrying cost of the assets exceeds its recoverable value. An impairment loss, if any, is charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss in the year in which an asset is identified as impaired. Reversal of impairment losses recognised in the prior years is recorded when there is an indication that the impairment losses recognised for the assets no longer exist or have decreased. (f) Investments Investments, which are readily realizable and intended to be held for not more than one year from the date on which such investments are made, are classified as current investments. All other investments are classified as long-term investments. On initial recognition, all investments are measured at cost. The cost comprises purchase price and directly attributable acquisition charges such as brokerage, fees and duties. Current investments are carried in the financial statements at lower of cost and fair value determined on an individual investment basis. Long-term investments are carried at cost. However, provision for diminutions in value is made to recognize a decline other than temporary in the value of the investments. Current Investments are stated at lower of cost and net realizable value. Long term investments are stated at cost after deducting provisions made, if any, for other than temporary diminution in the value. On disposal of an investment, the difference between its carrying amount and net disposal proceeds is charged or credited to the Statement of Profit and Loss. (g) Revenue Recognition Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Company and can be reliably measured. Interest Income is recognized on a time proportion basis taking into account the amount outstanding and applicable interest rate. Dividend income on investments is accounted for when the right to receive the payment is established which is generally when the shareholders approves the dividend. Profit or loss on sale of current investments is determined on the basis of the weighted average cost method. (h) Foreign Currency Transactions Initial Recognition Foreign currency transactions are recorded in the reporting currency, by applying to the foreign currency amount, the exchange rate between the reporting currency and the foreign currency at the date of the transaction. Conversion Foreign currency monetary items are retranslated using the exchange rate prevailing at the reporting rate. Non-monetary items, which are measured in terms of historical cost denominated in a foreign currency, are reported using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary items, which are measured at fair value or other similar valuation denominated in a foreign currency, are translated using the exchange rate at the date when such value was determined. Exchange Differences The Company accounts for exchange differences arising on translation/ settlement of foreign currency monetary items as below: 1. Exchange differences arising on a monetary item that, in substance, forms part of the Companyâs net investment in a non-integral foreign operation is accumulated in the foreign currency translation reserve until the disposal of the net investment. On the disposal of such net investment, the cumulative amount of the exchange differences which have been deferred and which relate to that investment is recognized as income or as expenses in the same period in which the gain or loss on disposal is recognized. 2. Exchange differences arising on other long-term foreign currency monetary items are accumulated in the âForeign Currency Monetary Item Translation Difference Accountâ and amortized over the remaining life of the concerned monetary item. 3. All other exchange differences are recognized as income or as expenses in the period in which they arise. (i) Taxation Tax expense comprises of current and deferred tax. Provision for current tax is made on the basis of estimated taxable income for the current accounting year in accordance with the Income Tax Act, 1961. Current tax assets and current tax liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle the asset and the liability on a net basis. The deferred tax for timing differences between the book and tax profits for the year is accounted for, using the tax rates and laws that have been substantively enacted as of the Balance Sheet date. Deferred tax assets arising from timing differences are recognised to the extent there is reasonable certainty that these would be realised in future. The carrying amount of deferred tax assets are reviewed at each Balance Sheet date. The Company writes down the carrying amount of a deferred tax asset to the extent that it is no longer reasonably certain, that sufficient future taxable income will be available against which deferred tax asset can be realised. Any such write-down is reversed to the extent that it becomes reasonably certain, that sufficient future taxable income will be available. In case of unabsorbed losses and unabsorbed depreciation, all deferred tax assets are recognised only if there is virtual certainty supported by convincing evidence that they can be realised against future taxable profit. At each Balance Sheet date the Company reassesses the unrecognised deferred tax assets. Minimum Alternative Tax (MAT) credit is recognised as an asset only when and to the extent there is convincing evidence that the Company will pay normal income tax during the specified period. In the year in which the MAT credit becomes eligible to be recognised as an asset in accordance with the recommendations contained in Guidance Note issued by the ICAI, the said asset is created by way of a credit to the Statement of Profit and Loss and shown as MAT Credit Entitlement. The Company reviews the same at each Balance Sheet date and writes down the carrying amount of MAT Credit Entitlement to the extent there is no longer convincing evidence to the effect that the Company will pay normal Income Tax during the specified period. (j) Retirement and Other Employee Benefits Defined Contribution Plan Retirement benefit in the form of Provident Fund, Employee Pension Fund, Employee Deposit Linked Insurance and Superannuation Schemes is a defined contribution scheme. The Company has no obligation, other than the contribution payable to the provident fund. The Company recognizes contribution payable to the provident fund scheme as an expenditure, when an employee renders the related service. If the contribution payable to the scheme for service received before the balance sheet date exceeds the contribution already paid, the deficit payable to the scheme is recognized as a liability after deducting the contribution already paid. If the contribution already paid exceeds the contribution due for services received before the balance sheet date, then excess is recognized as an asset to the extent that the pre-payment will lead to, for example, a reduction in future payment or a cash refund. Defined Benefit Plan The Company operates two defined benefit plans for its employees, viz., and gratuity and leave encashment. The costs of providing benefits under these plans are determined on the basis of actuarial valuation at each year-end. Separate actuarial valuation is carried out for each plan using the projected unit credit method. Actuarial gains and losses for both defined benefit plans are recognized in full in the period in which they occur in the statement of profit and loss. Accumulated leave, which is expected to be utilized within the next 12 months, is treated as short-term employee benefit. The Company measures the expected cost of such absences as the additional amount that it expects to pay as a result of the unused entitlement that has accumulated at the balance sheet date. The Company treats accumulated leave expected to be carried forward beyond twelve months, as long-term employee benefit for measurement purposes. Such long-term compensated absences are provided for based on the actuarial valuation using the projected unit credit method at the year-end. Actuarial gains/losses are immediately taken to the statement of profit and loss and are not deferred. The Company presents the entire leave as a current liability in the balance sheet, since it does not have an unconditional right to defer its settlement for 12 months after the balance sheet date. (k) Contingent Liabilities and Provisions Contingent liability is a possible obligation that arises from past events whose existence will be confirmed by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events beyond the control of the Company or a present obligation that is not recognized because it is not probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation. A contingent liability also arises in extremely rare cases where there is a liability that cannot be recognized because it cannot be measured reliably. The Company does not recognize a contingent liability but discloses its existence in the financial statements. Provision is recognized when the enterprise has a present obligation as a result of past event and it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, in respect of which a reliable estimate can be made. Provisions are not discounted to their present value and are determined based on management estimate required to settle the obligation at the balance sheet date. These are reviewed at each balance sheet date and adjusted to reflect the current management estimates. (l) Leases Leases in which the Company does not transfer substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the asset are classified as operating leases. Assets subject to operating leases are included in fixed assets. Lease income on an operating lease is recognized in the statement of profit and loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Costs, including depreciation, are recognized as an expense in the statement of profit and loss. Initial direct costs such as legal costs, brokerage costs, etc. are recognized immediately in the statement of profit and loss. (m) Cash and Cash Equivalent Cash and cash equivalents for the purposes of cash flow statement comprise cash at bank and in hand and short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less. (n) Borrowing Costs Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of an asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale are capitalised as part of the cost of the asset. All other borrowing costs are expensed in the period in which they occur. Borrowing costs consist of interest and other costs that an entity incurs in connection with the borrowing of funds. Borrowing cost also includes exchange differences to the extent regarded as an adjustment to the borrowing costs. (o) Cash Flow Statement Cash flows are reported using the indirect method, whereby net profit before tax is adjusted for the effects of transactions of a non-cash nature, any deferrals or accruals of past or future operating cash receipts or payments and item of income or expenses associated with investing or financing cash flows. The cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities of the Company are segregated. (p) Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing the net profit or loss for the period attributable to equity shareholders (after deducting preference dividends and attributable taxes) by the weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the period and for all periods presented is adjusted for events, such as bonus shares, other than the conversion of potential equity shares that have changed the number of equity shares outstanding, without a corresponding change in resources. For the purpose of calculating diluted earnings per share, the net profit or loss for the period attributable to equity shareholders and the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period is adjusted for the effects of all dilutive potential equity shares. Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article Aditya Birla Capital Ltd. ಹೆಚ್ಚಿನ ಮಾಹಿತಿ
Notifications
Settings
Clear Notifications
Notifications
Use the toggle to switch on notifications
Stay Informed.
Get news and videos anytime and anywhere.
By signing in, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy
Gender
Select your Gender
Age
Select your Age Range
|